提高生产力的政策是否符合目的?

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Manchester School Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1111/manc.12464
Bart van Ark, Klaas de Vries, Dirk Pilat
{"title":"提高生产力的政策是否符合目的?","authors":"Bart van Ark,&nbsp;Klaas de Vries,&nbsp;Dirk Pilat","doi":"10.1111/manc.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper we examine productivity trends, drivers of productivity growth and pro-productivity policies across the G-20 economies since 1970. While we find distinctly different productivity growth dynamics between G-20 economies and over time, one common observation is a widely shared slowdown in labour productivity growth since the 2010s underpinned by lower (or even negative) total factor productivity growth. Moreover, the growth in capital per worker hour has also begun to level off. We develop a typology of pro-productivity policies and argue that policies for investment and technological change need strengthening to support a revival of productivity growth. Such policies should include a balanced approach to stronger technological progress and more rapid diffusion; a strengthening of investment, especially in intangibles and public services; and greater attention for human capital. We also argue for stronger institutions and capabilities that allow for dynamic learning about pro-productivity policies across countries and over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":47546,"journal":{"name":"Manchester School","volume":"92 2","pages":"191-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/manc.12464","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are pro-productivity policies fit for purpose?\",\"authors\":\"Bart van Ark,&nbsp;Klaas de Vries,&nbsp;Dirk Pilat\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/manc.12464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper we examine productivity trends, drivers of productivity growth and pro-productivity policies across the G-20 economies since 1970. While we find distinctly different productivity growth dynamics between G-20 economies and over time, one common observation is a widely shared slowdown in labour productivity growth since the 2010s underpinned by lower (or even negative) total factor productivity growth. Moreover, the growth in capital per worker hour has also begun to level off. We develop a typology of pro-productivity policies and argue that policies for investment and technological change need strengthening to support a revival of productivity growth. Such policies should include a balanced approach to stronger technological progress and more rapid diffusion; a strengthening of investment, especially in intangibles and public services; and greater attention for human capital. We also argue for stronger institutions and capabilities that allow for dynamic learning about pro-productivity policies across countries and over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manchester School\",\"volume\":\"92 2\",\"pages\":\"191-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/manc.12464\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manchester School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.12464\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manchester School","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/manc.12464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了1970年以来g20经济体的生产率趋势、生产率增长的驱动因素和促进生产率的政策。虽然我们发现20国集团经济体之间以及不同时期的生产率增长动态存在明显差异,但一个共同的观察结果是,自2010年代以来,全要素生产率增长放缓(甚至为负),这是普遍存在的。此外,每工人小时资本的增长也开始趋于平稳。我们制定了一种促进生产力的政策类型,并认为需要加强投资和技术变革政策,以支持生产率增长的复苏。这种政策应包括以平衡的方式促进技术进步和更迅速的扩散;加强投资,特别是无形资产和公共服务方面的投资;更多地关注人力资本。我们还主张加强制度和能力,以便在各国和不同时期动态学习促进生产力的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are pro-productivity policies fit for purpose?

In this paper we examine productivity trends, drivers of productivity growth and pro-productivity policies across the G-20 economies since 1970. While we find distinctly different productivity growth dynamics between G-20 economies and over time, one common observation is a widely shared slowdown in labour productivity growth since the 2010s underpinned by lower (or even negative) total factor productivity growth. Moreover, the growth in capital per worker hour has also begun to level off. We develop a typology of pro-productivity policies and argue that policies for investment and technological change need strengthening to support a revival of productivity growth. Such policies should include a balanced approach to stronger technological progress and more rapid diffusion; a strengthening of investment, especially in intangibles and public services; and greater attention for human capital. We also argue for stronger institutions and capabilities that allow for dynamic learning about pro-productivity policies across countries and over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manchester School
Manchester School ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Manchester School was first published more than seventy years ago and has become a distinguished, internationally recognised, general economics journal. The Manchester School publishes high-quality research covering all areas of the economics discipline, although the editors particularly encourage original contributions, or authoritative surveys, in the fields of microeconomics (including industrial organisation and game theory), macroeconomics, econometrics (both theory and applied) and labour economics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Robots at work: New evidence with recent data Issue Information Strategic advertising in the aftermath of a corporate scandal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1