区块链和数字治理:决策政策的分散化

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Review of Policy Research Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1111/ropr.12585
Maxat Kassen
{"title":"区块链和数字治理:决策政策的分散化","authors":"Maxat Kassen","doi":"10.1111/ropr.12585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain is gaining popularity as a potential solution for the decentralized management of public information. A number of interesting solutions have been proposed by independent developers around the world to promote blockchain as a promising platform to potentially accelerate democratic processes and achieve certain public values in reforming digital governance. This could be reflected in facilitating direct citizen participation in digital politics, promoting greater civic cooperation and engagement in political discussions, boosting the role of civic commentary and even collaborative decision-making in e-government. In this regard, the article critically elaborates on the potential of this technology to promote political dimensions of public sector reforms in a post-positivist manner, resorting to the analysis of concrete e-participation cases in a number of public areas where the potential has already been realized and the opinions of professional software developers who are currently engaged in building various blockchain-driven data management solutions in the e-government area. This paper identifies, debates, and draws on what benefits and risks public policy can yield from the implementation of blockchain governance.","PeriodicalId":47408,"journal":{"name":"Review of Policy Research","volume":"103 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain and digital governance: Decentralization of decision making policy\",\"authors\":\"Maxat Kassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ropr.12585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blockchain is gaining popularity as a potential solution for the decentralized management of public information. A number of interesting solutions have been proposed by independent developers around the world to promote blockchain as a promising platform to potentially accelerate democratic processes and achieve certain public values in reforming digital governance. This could be reflected in facilitating direct citizen participation in digital politics, promoting greater civic cooperation and engagement in political discussions, boosting the role of civic commentary and even collaborative decision-making in e-government. In this regard, the article critically elaborates on the potential of this technology to promote political dimensions of public sector reforms in a post-positivist manner, resorting to the analysis of concrete e-participation cases in a number of public areas where the potential has already been realized and the opinions of professional software developers who are currently engaged in building various blockchain-driven data management solutions in the e-government area. This paper identifies, debates, and draws on what benefits and risks public policy can yield from the implementation of blockchain governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Policy Research\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Policy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12585\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

区块链作为公共信息分散管理的潜在解决方案正越来越受欢迎。世界各地的独立开发者提出了许多有趣的解决方案,以促进区块链作为一个有前途的平台,有可能加速民主进程,并在改革数字治理方面实现某些公共价值。这可以体现在促进公民直接参与数字政治,促进更多的公民合作和参与政治讨论,提高公民评论的作用,甚至在电子政务中的协作决策。在这方面,本文通过对一些已经实现潜力的公共领域的具体电子参与案例的分析,以及目前从事电子政务领域构建各种区块链驱动数据管理解决方案的专业软件开发人员的意见,批判性地阐述了该技术以后实证主义方式促进公共部门改革的政治层面的潜力。本文确定、讨论并借鉴了公共政策从实施区块链治理中可能产生的利益和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blockchain and digital governance: Decentralization of decision making policy
Blockchain is gaining popularity as a potential solution for the decentralized management of public information. A number of interesting solutions have been proposed by independent developers around the world to promote blockchain as a promising platform to potentially accelerate democratic processes and achieve certain public values in reforming digital governance. This could be reflected in facilitating direct citizen participation in digital politics, promoting greater civic cooperation and engagement in political discussions, boosting the role of civic commentary and even collaborative decision-making in e-government. In this regard, the article critically elaborates on the potential of this technology to promote political dimensions of public sector reforms in a post-positivist manner, resorting to the analysis of concrete e-participation cases in a number of public areas where the potential has already been realized and the opinions of professional software developers who are currently engaged in building various blockchain-driven data management solutions in the e-government area. This paper identifies, debates, and draws on what benefits and risks public policy can yield from the implementation of blockchain governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
23.80%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Review of Policy Research (RPR) is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of research and analysis examining the politics and policy of science and technology. These may include issues of science policy, environment, resource management, information networks, cultural industries, biotechnology, security and surveillance, privacy, globalization, education, research and innovation, development, intellectual property, health and demographics. The journal encompasses research and analysis on politics and the outcomes and consequences of policy change in domestic and comparative contexts.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the dynamics of information exchange in governance networks: Opportunity structures in anti‐corruption multi‐stakeholder partnerships Information and expertise in public policy Embracing the politics of transformation: Policy action as “battle‐settlement events” Reputation management in turmoil—An analysis of the clashing narratives in the introduction of a “salmon tax” in Norway The narrative policy framework and institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1