利用信息准则寻找隐马尔可夫模型中潜在状态的数量

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Ecological Statistics Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s10651-023-00584-5
Jodie Buckby, Ting Wang, David Fletcher, Jiancang Zhuang, Akiko Takeo, Kazushige Obara
{"title":"利用信息准则寻找隐马尔可夫模型中潜在状态的数量","authors":"Jodie Buckby, Ting Wang, David Fletcher, Jiancang Zhuang, Akiko Takeo, Kazushige Obara","doi":"10.1007/s10651-023-00584-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are often used to model time series data and are applied in many fields of research. However, estimating the unknown number of hidden states in the Markov chain is a non-trivial component of HMM model selection and an area of active research. Currently, AIC and BIC are commonly used for this purpose, despite theoretical issues and some evidence of poor performance in the literature. Here, motivated by the HMMs developed to model seismic tremor data, we use simulation studies to compare the performance of a number of model selection information criteria when used to select the number of hidden states in HMMs, including an adjusted BIC not previously used with HMMs. We find that AIC and BIC are not always reliable tools for selecting the number of hidden states in HMMs and that other information criteria such as adjusted BIC can actually perform better, depending on factors such as sample size and sojourn times in each state. We apply the information criteria to a set of HMMs fitted to seismic tremor data and compare the models selected by the different criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"101 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding the number of latent states in hidden Markov models using information criteria\",\"authors\":\"Jodie Buckby, Ting Wang, David Fletcher, Jiancang Zhuang, Akiko Takeo, Kazushige Obara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10651-023-00584-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are often used to model time series data and are applied in many fields of research. However, estimating the unknown number of hidden states in the Markov chain is a non-trivial component of HMM model selection and an area of active research. Currently, AIC and BIC are commonly used for this purpose, despite theoretical issues and some evidence of poor performance in the literature. Here, motivated by the HMMs developed to model seismic tremor data, we use simulation studies to compare the performance of a number of model selection information criteria when used to select the number of hidden states in HMMs, including an adjusted BIC not previously used with HMMs. We find that AIC and BIC are not always reliable tools for selecting the number of hidden states in HMMs and that other information criteria such as adjusted BIC can actually perform better, depending on factors such as sample size and sojourn times in each state. We apply the information criteria to a set of HMMs fitted to seismic tremor data and compare the models selected by the different criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"volume\":\"101 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-023-00584-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-023-00584-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隐马尔可夫模型(hmm)通常用于时间序列数据的建模,并在许多研究领域得到应用。然而,估计马尔可夫链中未知隐藏状态的数量是HMM模型选择的一个重要组成部分,也是一个活跃的研究领域。目前,AIC和BIC通常用于此目的,尽管存在理论问题和一些文献中表现不佳的证据。在此,受用于模拟地震数据的hmm的激励,我们使用仿真研究来比较用于选择hmm中隐藏状态数量的许多模型选择信息标准的性能,包括先前未用于hmm的调整BIC。我们发现AIC和BIC并不总是选择hmm中隐藏状态数量的可靠工具,而其他信息标准(如调整后的BIC)实际上可以表现得更好,这取决于每个状态的样本量和逗留时间等因素。我们将信息准则应用于一组地震地震资料拟合的hmm模型,并比较了不同准则所选择的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding the number of latent states in hidden Markov models using information criteria

Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are often used to model time series data and are applied in many fields of research. However, estimating the unknown number of hidden states in the Markov chain is a non-trivial component of HMM model selection and an area of active research. Currently, AIC and BIC are commonly used for this purpose, despite theoretical issues and some evidence of poor performance in the literature. Here, motivated by the HMMs developed to model seismic tremor data, we use simulation studies to compare the performance of a number of model selection information criteria when used to select the number of hidden states in HMMs, including an adjusted BIC not previously used with HMMs. We find that AIC and BIC are not always reliable tools for selecting the number of hidden states in HMMs and that other information criteria such as adjusted BIC can actually perform better, depending on factors such as sample size and sojourn times in each state. We apply the information criteria to a set of HMMs fitted to seismic tremor data and compare the models selected by the different criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Environmental and Ecological Statistics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues. Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics. Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.
期刊最新文献
Identifying key drivers of extinction for Chitala populations: data-driven insights from an intraguild predation model using a Bayesian framework Health effects of noise and application of machine learning techniques as prediction tools in noise induced health issues: a systematic review Multivariate Bayesian models with flexible shared interactions for analyzing spatio-temporal patterns of rare cancers A novel hybrid approach based on outlier and error correction methods to predict river discharge using meteorological variables Bayesian design methods for improving the effectiveness of ecosystem monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1