探索科学教师的注意:教师注意到什么,用视频捕捉教师知识

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Science and Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1111/ssm.12623
Julie A. Luft, Yuxi Huang, Harleen Singh, Hatice Ozen-Tasdemir, Joe DeLuca, Shelby Watson, Elizabeth Ayano, Brooke A. Whitworth
{"title":"探索科学教师的注意:教师注意到什么,用视频捕捉教师知识","authors":"Julie A. Luft, Yuxi Huang, Harleen Singh, Hatice Ozen-Tasdemir, Joe DeLuca, Shelby Watson, Elizabeth Ayano, Brooke A. Whitworth","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowing how science teachers develop their professional knowledge has been a challenge. One potential way to determine the professional knowledge of teachers is through videos. In the study described here, the authors recruited 60 elementary and secondary science teachers, showed them one of two 10-min videos, and recorded and analyzed their comments when watching the videos. The coding focused on their noticing of student learning, teacher's teaching, types of teaching practices, and the use of interpretative frames. The noticing data were collected and analyzed to determine the differences between groups of teachers. The findings from the analysis indicated that most science teachers noticed the instruction of teachers rather than the learning of students, and these noticing events were often focused on general instructional practices as opposed to the science practices emphasized in the <i>Next Generation Science Standards</i> (National Research Council, 2013). The only difference between the teachers was in the area of evaluating the videos. Secondary science teachers and experienced elementary teachers were more likely to evaluate the videos than were novice elementary teachers. This may be a result of the knowledge base of the teachers. These results suggest a need for explicit reform-based instruction and a revision of this research process.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the noticing of science teachers: What teachers' notice and using video to capture teacher knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Julie A. Luft, Yuxi Huang, Harleen Singh, Hatice Ozen-Tasdemir, Joe DeLuca, Shelby Watson, Elizabeth Ayano, Brooke A. Whitworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ssm.12623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowing how science teachers develop their professional knowledge has been a challenge. One potential way to determine the professional knowledge of teachers is through videos. In the study described here, the authors recruited 60 elementary and secondary science teachers, showed them one of two 10-min videos, and recorded and analyzed their comments when watching the videos. The coding focused on their noticing of student learning, teacher's teaching, types of teaching practices, and the use of interpretative frames. The noticing data were collected and analyzed to determine the differences between groups of teachers. The findings from the analysis indicated that most science teachers noticed the instruction of teachers rather than the learning of students, and these noticing events were often focused on general instructional practices as opposed to the science practices emphasized in the <i>Next Generation Science Standards</i> (National Research Council, 2013). The only difference between the teachers was in the area of evaluating the videos. Secondary science teachers and experienced elementary teachers were more likely to evaluate the videos than were novice elementary teachers. This may be a result of the knowledge base of the teachers. These results suggest a need for explicit reform-based instruction and a revision of this research process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Science and Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"191 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Science and Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解科学教师如何发展他们的专业知识一直是一个挑战。确定教师专业知识的一个潜在方法是通过视频。在这里描述的研究中,作者招募了60名中小学科学教师,向他们展示了两个10分钟视频中的一个,并记录和分析了他们在观看视频时的评论。编码集中在他们对学生学习的注意、教师的教学、教学实践的类型和解释框架的使用。收集并分析注意数据,以确定教师群体之间的差异。分析的结果表明,大多数科学教师注意到的是教师的指导,而不是学生的学习,这些注意事件往往集中在一般的教学实践上,而不是下一代科学标准中强调的科学实践(国家研究委员会,2013)。老师之间唯一的区别是在评估视频方面。中学科学教师和有经验的小学教师比初级小学教师更倾向于评价视频。这可能与教师的知识基础有关。这些结果表明,需要明确的改革为基础的指导和修订这一研究过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the noticing of science teachers: What teachers' notice and using video to capture teacher knowledge
Knowing how science teachers develop their professional knowledge has been a challenge. One potential way to determine the professional knowledge of teachers is through videos. In the study described here, the authors recruited 60 elementary and secondary science teachers, showed them one of two 10-min videos, and recorded and analyzed their comments when watching the videos. The coding focused on their noticing of student learning, teacher's teaching, types of teaching practices, and the use of interpretative frames. The noticing data were collected and analyzed to determine the differences between groups of teachers. The findings from the analysis indicated that most science teachers noticed the instruction of teachers rather than the learning of students, and these noticing events were often focused on general instructional practices as opposed to the science practices emphasized in the Next Generation Science Standards (National Research Council, 2013). The only difference between the teachers was in the area of evaluating the videos. Secondary science teachers and experienced elementary teachers were more likely to evaluate the videos than were novice elementary teachers. This may be a result of the knowledge base of the teachers. These results suggest a need for explicit reform-based instruction and a revision of this research process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Impacting elementary STEM teacher leadership identities Fostering students' inquiry aptitudes and collaborative reasoning in higher education science courses with social annotation tools and collaborative platforms Re‐imagining professional learning communities in education: Placing teacher leadership in STEM context Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice What does a scientist look like? Children's perceptions of scientist gender and skin tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1