比较威斯康星州非商业和商业枫糖浆生产商的动机、学习兴趣和扩张障碍

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Small-Scale Forestry Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s11842-023-09557-9
Scott Hershberger, Bret Shaw, Tricia A. Gorby, Jeremy Solin, Patrick Robinson, Kris Tiles, Chad Cook, Chen-Ting Chang
{"title":"比较威斯康星州非商业和商业枫糖浆生产商的动机、学习兴趣和扩张障碍","authors":"Scott Hershberger, Bret Shaw, Tricia A. Gorby, Jeremy Solin, Patrick Robinson, Kris Tiles, Chad Cook, Chen-Ting Chang","doi":"10.1007/s11842-023-09557-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maple syrup production can provide significant value to rural economies and contribute to the long-term sustainability of forest ecosystems. Producers’ experiences vary based on their type of sugaring operation, so foresters, Extension educators, and equipment suppliers can more effectively support the expansion of maple syrup production if they tailor their outreach to the needs of each type of producer. Drawing on a survey of Wisconsin maple syrup producers (<i>n</i> = 657), this study compares the motivations, confidence in forest management knowledge, interests in learning, interests in new behaviors, desire to expand, and barriers to expansion among three groups of maple syrup producers: non-commercial, small commercial, and large commercial producers. Most producers were motivated by spending time in nature, and as might be expected, commercial producers were more motivated by finances than non-commercial producers. All three groups expressed interest in forest health management. The producers most interested in expansion were those who already sell for income, who are motivated by finances, who have fewer seasons of experience, and are newer woodland owners. Key barriers to expansion included efficient sap collection and a lack of time for non-commercial and small commercial producers, while workforce availability and a lack of capital were key barriers to expansion for both groups of commercial producers. Based on these results, we provide recommendations for audience segmentation strategies to support maple syrup producers through education, marketing, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48983,"journal":{"name":"Small-Scale Forestry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Motivations, Learning Interests, and Barriers to Expansion Among Non-commercial and Commercial Maple Syrup Producers in Wisconsin\",\"authors\":\"Scott Hershberger, Bret Shaw, Tricia A. Gorby, Jeremy Solin, Patrick Robinson, Kris Tiles, Chad Cook, Chen-Ting Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11842-023-09557-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Maple syrup production can provide significant value to rural economies and contribute to the long-term sustainability of forest ecosystems. Producers’ experiences vary based on their type of sugaring operation, so foresters, Extension educators, and equipment suppliers can more effectively support the expansion of maple syrup production if they tailor their outreach to the needs of each type of producer. Drawing on a survey of Wisconsin maple syrup producers (<i>n</i> = 657), this study compares the motivations, confidence in forest management knowledge, interests in learning, interests in new behaviors, desire to expand, and barriers to expansion among three groups of maple syrup producers: non-commercial, small commercial, and large commercial producers. Most producers were motivated by spending time in nature, and as might be expected, commercial producers were more motivated by finances than non-commercial producers. All three groups expressed interest in forest health management. The producers most interested in expansion were those who already sell for income, who are motivated by finances, who have fewer seasons of experience, and are newer woodland owners. Key barriers to expansion included efficient sap collection and a lack of time for non-commercial and small commercial producers, while workforce availability and a lack of capital were key barriers to expansion for both groups of commercial producers. Based on these results, we provide recommendations for audience segmentation strategies to support maple syrup producers through education, marketing, and research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Small-Scale Forestry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Small-Scale Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-023-09557-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small-Scale Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-023-09557-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

枫糖浆生产可以为农村经济提供巨大价值,并有助于森林生态系统的长期可持续性。生产者的经验因其制糖作业类型而异,因此,如果林农、推广教育工作者和设备供应商根据每种生产者的需求量身定制推广活动,就可以更有效地支持枫糖浆生产的扩大。根据对威斯康星州枫糖浆生产商的调查(n = 657),本研究比较了三组枫糖浆生产商(非商业、小型商业和大型商业生产商)的动机、对森林管理知识的信心、对学习的兴趣、对新行为的兴趣、扩张的愿望和扩张的障碍。大多数生产者的动机是花时间在大自然中,正如所料,商业生产者比非商业生产者更受资金的激励。这三个团体都表示对森林健康管理感兴趣。对扩张最感兴趣的生产者是那些已经出售收入的人,他们受到资金的激励,他们的经验较少,并且是新的林地所有者。扩大的主要障碍包括有效的树液收集和非商业生产者和小型商业生产者缺乏时间,而劳动力供应和缺乏资本是这两类商业生产者扩大的主要障碍。基于这些结果,我们提出了受众细分策略的建议,以支持枫糖浆生产商通过教育,营销和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Motivations, Learning Interests, and Barriers to Expansion Among Non-commercial and Commercial Maple Syrup Producers in Wisconsin

Maple syrup production can provide significant value to rural economies and contribute to the long-term sustainability of forest ecosystems. Producers’ experiences vary based on their type of sugaring operation, so foresters, Extension educators, and equipment suppliers can more effectively support the expansion of maple syrup production if they tailor their outreach to the needs of each type of producer. Drawing on a survey of Wisconsin maple syrup producers (n = 657), this study compares the motivations, confidence in forest management knowledge, interests in learning, interests in new behaviors, desire to expand, and barriers to expansion among three groups of maple syrup producers: non-commercial, small commercial, and large commercial producers. Most producers were motivated by spending time in nature, and as might be expected, commercial producers were more motivated by finances than non-commercial producers. All three groups expressed interest in forest health management. The producers most interested in expansion were those who already sell for income, who are motivated by finances, who have fewer seasons of experience, and are newer woodland owners. Key barriers to expansion included efficient sap collection and a lack of time for non-commercial and small commercial producers, while workforce availability and a lack of capital were key barriers to expansion for both groups of commercial producers. Based on these results, we provide recommendations for audience segmentation strategies to support maple syrup producers through education, marketing, and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emerging from discussions within IUFRO’s Small-scale Forestry group, Small-scale Forestry was originally published as Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy in 2002, with a view to providing an international forum for publishing high quality, peer-reviewed papers on pure and applied research into small-scale forestry. Although of particular interest to the global research community, the journal is also relevant to both policy makers and forest managers. The scope of the journal is necessarily quite broad, given the range of issues relevant to small-scale forestry. These include the social, economic and technical dimensions of farm, family, non-industrial, agro- and community forestry. Papers are accepted on the basis that they relate specifically to forestry at this scale, and that they are based on high quality research using accepted quantitative and/or qualitative methodology. Empirical, theoretical, modeling, and methodological papers are all welcome. The following research areas are particularly relevant to the journal: -the role of small-scale forestry in rural development- financial modeling and decision support systems- enhancing return from non-wood products- social impacts of small-scale forestry- marketing, forest co-operatives and growers organizations- role and effectiveness of government support and subsidies- innovative research techniques- education and extension- certification- silvicultural, wood harvesting and processing techniques and technologies- impediments to small-scale forestry development- monitoring socio-economics- forest management behaviour and timber supply
期刊最新文献
Local Institutional Strength of Village and Community Forests in Indonesia Promoting Agroforestry in India: Policy Analysis for Felling and Transit of Woods Grown in Private Lands Forest Owner Attitudes and Preferences for Voluntary Temporary Forest Conservation Ecological Perspective, Perception, and Attitude of Local Communities Toward Managing and Utilizing the Mangrove Ecosystem in Lampung Province, Indonesia Understanding the Experiences of Small-Scale Commercial Afforestation Farmers and Governance Conflicts in Manguzi, South Africa: Political Ecology Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1