IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Studies in East European Thought Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1007/s11212-023-09597-z
Frédéric Tremblay
{"title":"Nikolai Lossky, Dimitar Mihalchev, and Rehmkeanism","authors":"Frédéric Tremblay","doi":"10.1007/s11212-023-09597-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The philosophy of Johannes Rehmke (1848–1930), also called “Rehmkeanism,” and the intuitivism of Nikolai Lossky (1870–1965) converge on essential doctrinal points. The Bulgarian philosopher Dimitar Mihalchev (1880–1967), who studied under Rehmke in Greifswald, became a promoter of the Rehmkean philosophy in Bulgaria. The points of convergence between Rehmkeanism and Losskyan intuitivism led Mihalchev to develop an interest in Lossky. He visited Lossky in Saint Petersburg in 1911 and mentioned the similarities between Rehmke and Lossky in 1914 in <i>Forma i otnoshenie</i> (<i>Form and Relation</i>). They also moved in the same circles in Prague, where Lossky, whom Lenin had expelled from Russia in 1922, had found refuge, and where Mihalchev had been appointed ambassador between 1923 and 1927. After his return to Sofia, Mihalchev invited Lossky to publish an article in his newly created philosophy journal, <i>Filosofski pregled</i>. Mihalchev would likely have seen in Lossky an ally in his endeavor of promoting Rehmkeanism in Bulgaria. Moreover, given the similarities between Rehmke and Lossky, Mihalchev had come to believe that Lossky had, just like himself, been influenced by Rehmke and that he developed his intuitivism under this influence. However, Lossky, who translated one of Rehmke’s books as a student and who admitted similarities between Rehmke’s philosophy and his own intuitivism, nevertheless denied having been influenced by him. The present article proposes a comparison of Lossky and Rehmke, and chronicles the interactions between Lossky and Mihalchev in their historical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":43055,"journal":{"name":"Studies in East European Thought","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in East European Thought","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-023-09597-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约翰内斯·雷姆克(1848-1930)的哲学,也被称为“雷姆克主义”,与尼古拉·洛斯基(1870-1965)的直觉主义在基本的教义点上是一致的。保加利亚哲学家Dimitar Mihalchev(1880-1967)曾在Greifswald师从雷姆克,成为保加利亚雷姆克哲学的推动者。雷姆克主义和罗斯基的直觉主义之间的交汇点使米哈尔切夫对罗斯基产生了兴趣。他于1911年在圣彼得堡拜访了罗斯基,并在《形式与关系》中提到了雷姆克与1914年的罗斯基之间的相似之处。他们还在布拉格的同一个圈子里活动,1922年被列宁驱逐出俄国的罗斯基在那里找到了避难所,米哈尔切夫在1923年至1927年被任命为大使。回到索非亚后,米哈尔切夫邀请罗斯基在他新创办的哲学杂志《菲洛索夫斯基pre格勒》上发表一篇文章。米哈尔切夫很可能把罗斯基看作是他在保加利亚推动雷姆克主义的盟友。此外,考虑到雷姆克和罗斯基之间的相似之处,米哈尔切夫开始相信,罗斯基和他自己一样,受到雷姆克的影响,并在这种影响下发展了他的直觉主义。然而,罗斯基作为学生翻译了雷姆克的一本书,并承认雷姆克的哲学与他自己的直觉主义有相似之处,但他否认受到雷姆克的影响。本文对罗斯基和雷姆克进行了比较,并记录了罗斯基和米哈尔切夫在历史背景下的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nikolai Lossky, Dimitar Mihalchev, and Rehmkeanism

The philosophy of Johannes Rehmke (1848–1930), also called “Rehmkeanism,” and the intuitivism of Nikolai Lossky (1870–1965) converge on essential doctrinal points. The Bulgarian philosopher Dimitar Mihalchev (1880–1967), who studied under Rehmke in Greifswald, became a promoter of the Rehmkean philosophy in Bulgaria. The points of convergence between Rehmkeanism and Losskyan intuitivism led Mihalchev to develop an interest in Lossky. He visited Lossky in Saint Petersburg in 1911 and mentioned the similarities between Rehmke and Lossky in 1914 in Forma i otnoshenie (Form and Relation). They also moved in the same circles in Prague, where Lossky, whom Lenin had expelled from Russia in 1922, had found refuge, and where Mihalchev had been appointed ambassador between 1923 and 1927. After his return to Sofia, Mihalchev invited Lossky to publish an article in his newly created philosophy journal, Filosofski pregled. Mihalchev would likely have seen in Lossky an ally in his endeavor of promoting Rehmkeanism in Bulgaria. Moreover, given the similarities between Rehmke and Lossky, Mihalchev had come to believe that Lossky had, just like himself, been influenced by Rehmke and that he developed his intuitivism under this influence. However, Lossky, who translated one of Rehmke’s books as a student and who admitted similarities between Rehmke’s philosophy and his own intuitivism, nevertheless denied having been influenced by him. The present article proposes a comparison of Lossky and Rehmke, and chronicles the interactions between Lossky and Mihalchev in their historical context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Studies in East European Thought (SEET) provides a forum for impartial scholarly discussion of philosophical thought and intellectual history of East and Central Europe, Russia, as well as post-Soviet states. SEET offers a venue for philosophical dialogue in a variety of relevant fields of study. Predominantly a philosophical journal, SEET welcomes work that crosses established boundaries among disciplines whether by bringing other disciplines to respond to traditional philosophical questions or by using philosophical reflection to address specific disciplinary issues. The journal publishes original papers by scholars working in the field without discriminating them based on their geographical origin and nationality. The editorial team considers quality of work to be the sole criterion of publication. In addition to original scholarly essays, SEET publishes translations of philosophical texts not previously available in the West, as well as book reviews. * A forum for scholarly discussion on philosophical thought and intellectual history of East and Central Europe, Russia, and post-Soviet states * Includes analytic, comparative, and historical studies of thinkers, philosophical and intellectual schools and traditions * In addition to original papers, publishes translations and book reviews * Although formatting is not crucial at the review stage, authors are strongly advised to refer to the Submission Guidelines of SEET to which articles accepted for publication must conform
期刊最新文献
“Well, go, love Ivan!”: Ivan Karamazov unveiled and the “Pro and Contra” debate revisited The phenomenology of human existence movement: worldliness, transcendence, and responsibility Roman Witold Ingarden’s discussions on artistic style: A contribution Revolt against modernity? The finite subject and reflection in Jan Patočka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1