亲子冲突在Shuar伴侣选择和婚姻实践中的作用

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.11.002
Elizabeth G. Pillsworth , Rebecka K. Hahnel-Peeters , H. Clark Barrett
{"title":"亲子冲突在Shuar伴侣选择和婚姻实践中的作用","authors":"Elizabeth G. Pillsworth ,&nbsp;Rebecka K. Hahnel-Peeters ,&nbsp;H. Clark Barrett","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research argues that female choice may not be as powerful an influence on the evolution of human mating preferences as once expected given the importance of parental choice in marital practices across cultures. Furthermore, much of the literature supporting this argument assumes that endorsed cultural norms reported in the ethnographic record accurately represent individuals' behaviors. Here, we argue that the roles of parent-offspring conflict and parental choice are more nuanced. We test predictions from parent-offspring conflict theory and illuminate three loci of conflict between parents and daughters over partner choice. Using data from over 10 years of fieldwork in Shuar communities, we demonstrate that endorsed norms do not reflect complete behavioral repertoires at the individual level. We conclude that analyzing individual behavior provides insight into (1) areas of parental-offspring conflict and (2) complementary aspects of female choice and parental choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"44 6","pages":"Pages 639-651"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513823000909/pdfft?md5=4980345c04af63d1c3078c040cb9b53e&pid=1-s2.0-S1090513823000909-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of parent-offspring conflict in Shuar partner choice and marital practices\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth G. Pillsworth ,&nbsp;Rebecka K. Hahnel-Peeters ,&nbsp;H. Clark Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous research argues that female choice may not be as powerful an influence on the evolution of human mating preferences as once expected given the importance of parental choice in marital practices across cultures. Furthermore, much of the literature supporting this argument assumes that endorsed cultural norms reported in the ethnographic record accurately represent individuals' behaviors. Here, we argue that the roles of parent-offspring conflict and parental choice are more nuanced. We test predictions from parent-offspring conflict theory and illuminate three loci of conflict between parents and daughters over partner choice. Using data from over 10 years of fieldwork in Shuar communities, we demonstrate that endorsed norms do not reflect complete behavioral repertoires at the individual level. We conclude that analyzing individual behavior provides insight into (1) areas of parental-offspring conflict and (2) complementary aspects of female choice and parental choice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"44 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 639-651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513823000909/pdfft?md5=4980345c04af63d1c3078c040cb9b53e&pid=1-s2.0-S1090513823000909-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513823000909\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513823000909","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

先前的研究认为,考虑到父母的选择在不同文化的婚姻实践中的重要性,女性的选择对人类择偶偏好的影响可能没有人们曾经预期的那么大。此外,许多支持这一论点的文献假设,民族志记录中报告的认可的文化规范准确地代表了个人的行为。在这里,我们认为亲子冲突和父母选择的作用更加微妙。我们检验了亲子冲突理论的预测,并阐明了父母与女儿在伴侣选择上的三个冲突位点。通过对Shuar社区超过10年的实地调查数据,我们证明了认可的规范并不能反映个人层面上的完整行为。我们的结论是,分析个体行为可以洞察(1)父母-后代冲突的领域和(2)女性选择和父母选择的互补方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of parent-offspring conflict in Shuar partner choice and marital practices

Previous research argues that female choice may not be as powerful an influence on the evolution of human mating preferences as once expected given the importance of parental choice in marital practices across cultures. Furthermore, much of the literature supporting this argument assumes that endorsed cultural norms reported in the ethnographic record accurately represent individuals' behaviors. Here, we argue that the roles of parent-offspring conflict and parental choice are more nuanced. We test predictions from parent-offspring conflict theory and illuminate three loci of conflict between parents and daughters over partner choice. Using data from over 10 years of fieldwork in Shuar communities, we demonstrate that endorsed norms do not reflect complete behavioral repertoires at the individual level. We conclude that analyzing individual behavior provides insight into (1) areas of parental-offspring conflict and (2) complementary aspects of female choice and parental choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
期刊最新文献
Effects of synchronous chanting and identity fusion on perceived ingroup formidability, outgroup threat, and parochial altruism among soccer fans Editorial Board Trustworthiness: an adaptationist account Emotional tears: What they are and how they work Men's but not women's risk proneness in early adulthood is associated with lifetime reproductive success: evidence for sexual selection in modern environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1