综合医疗保健系统内骨密度测量评估流程全国调查

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101459
Melissa J.A. Steffen , Kimberly D. McCoy , Michelle A. Mengeling , Karla L. Miller , Heather Davila , Shylo E. Wardyn , Amal Shibli-Rahhal , Irfan Farukhi Bone Densitometry Survey Work Group , Samantha L. Solimeo
{"title":"综合医疗保健系统内骨密度测量评估流程全国调查","authors":"Melissa J.A. Steffen ,&nbsp;Kimberly D. McCoy ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Mengeling ,&nbsp;Karla L. Miller ,&nbsp;Heather Davila ,&nbsp;Shylo E. Wardyn ,&nbsp;Amal Shibli-Rahhal ,&nbsp;Irfan Farukhi Bone Densitometry Survey Work Group ,&nbsp;Samantha L. Solimeo","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background</em><span>: To assess the current state of bone mineral density evaluation services via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided to Veterans with fracture risk through the development and administration of a nationwide survey of facilities in the Veterans Health Administration.</span></p><p><em>Methodology</em><span>: The Bone Densitometry Survey was developed by convening a Work Group of individuals with expertise in bone densitometry and engaging the Work Group in an iterative drafting and revision process. Once completed, the survey was beta tested, administered through REDCap, and sent via e-mail to points of contact at 178 VHA facilities.</span></p><p><em>Results</em>: Facility response rate was 31 % (56/178). Most DXA centers reported positively to markers of readiness for their bone densitometers: less than 10 years old (n=35; 63 %); in “excellent” or “good” condition (n=44; 78 %, 32 % and 46 %, respectively); and perform phantom calibration (n=43; 77 %). Forty-one DXA centers (73 %) use intake processes that have been shown to reduce errors. Thirty-seven DXA centers (66 %) reported their technologists receive specialized training in DXA, while 14 (25 %) indicated they receive accredited training. Seventeen DXA centers (30 %) reported performing routine precision assessment.</p><p><em>Conclusions</em>: Many DXA centers reported using practices that meet minimal standards for DXA reporting and preparation; however, the lack of standardization, even within an integrated healthcare system, indicates an opportunity for quality improvement to ensure consistent high quality bone mineral density evaluation of Veterans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"27 1","pages":"Article 101459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Survey of the Bone Densitometry Evaluation Process Within an Integrated Healthcare System\",\"authors\":\"Melissa J.A. Steffen ,&nbsp;Kimberly D. McCoy ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Mengeling ,&nbsp;Karla L. Miller ,&nbsp;Heather Davila ,&nbsp;Shylo E. Wardyn ,&nbsp;Amal Shibli-Rahhal ,&nbsp;Irfan Farukhi Bone Densitometry Survey Work Group ,&nbsp;Samantha L. Solimeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Background</em><span>: To assess the current state of bone mineral density evaluation services via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided to Veterans with fracture risk through the development and administration of a nationwide survey of facilities in the Veterans Health Administration.</span></p><p><em>Methodology</em><span>: The Bone Densitometry Survey was developed by convening a Work Group of individuals with expertise in bone densitometry and engaging the Work Group in an iterative drafting and revision process. Once completed, the survey was beta tested, administered through REDCap, and sent via e-mail to points of contact at 178 VHA facilities.</span></p><p><em>Results</em>: Facility response rate was 31 % (56/178). Most DXA centers reported positively to markers of readiness for their bone densitometers: less than 10 years old (n=35; 63 %); in “excellent” or “good” condition (n=44; 78 %, 32 % and 46 %, respectively); and perform phantom calibration (n=43; 77 %). Forty-one DXA centers (73 %) use intake processes that have been shown to reduce errors. Thirty-seven DXA centers (66 %) reported their technologists receive specialized training in DXA, while 14 (25 %) indicated they receive accredited training. Seventeen DXA centers (30 %) reported performing routine precision assessment.</p><p><em>Conclusions</em>: Many DXA centers reported using practices that meet minimal standards for DXA reporting and preparation; however, the lack of standardization, even within an integrated healthcare system, indicates an opportunity for quality improvement to ensure consistent high quality bone mineral density evaluation of Veterans.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Densitometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023001099\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023001099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景通过对退伍军人健康管理局的机构进行全国范围的调查,评估通过双能 X 射线吸收法 (DXA) 为有骨折风险的退伍军人提供骨密度评估服务的现状。方法通过召集骨密度测量方面的专家组成工作组,并让工作组参与反复起草和修订过程,制定了骨密度测量调查表。调查完成后,通过 REDCap 进行了测试,并通过电子邮件发送给 178 家退伍军人管理局机构的联系人。大多数 DXA 中心对其骨密度测量仪的就绪标记给予了肯定:使用不到 10 年(35 个;63%);状况 "极好 "或 "良好"(44 个;78% - 分别为 32% 和 46%);并进行了模型校准(43 个;77%)。41 家 DXA 中心(73%)采用了已被证明可减少误差的接收流程。37家DXA中心(66%)称其技术人员接受过DXA专业培训,14家(25%)表示接受过认证培训。结论:许多 DXA 中心报告说,他们的做法符合 DXA 报告和准备的最低标准;然而,即使在一个综合医疗系统中,也缺乏标准化,这表明有机会提高质量,以确保退伍军人的骨矿密度评估质量始终如一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National Survey of the Bone Densitometry Evaluation Process Within an Integrated Healthcare System

Background: To assess the current state of bone mineral density evaluation services via dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) provided to Veterans with fracture risk through the development and administration of a nationwide survey of facilities in the Veterans Health Administration.

Methodology: The Bone Densitometry Survey was developed by convening a Work Group of individuals with expertise in bone densitometry and engaging the Work Group in an iterative drafting and revision process. Once completed, the survey was beta tested, administered through REDCap, and sent via e-mail to points of contact at 178 VHA facilities.

Results: Facility response rate was 31 % (56/178). Most DXA centers reported positively to markers of readiness for their bone densitometers: less than 10 years old (n=35; 63 %); in “excellent” or “good” condition (n=44; 78 %, 32 % and 46 %, respectively); and perform phantom calibration (n=43; 77 %). Forty-one DXA centers (73 %) use intake processes that have been shown to reduce errors. Thirty-seven DXA centers (66 %) reported their technologists receive specialized training in DXA, while 14 (25 %) indicated they receive accredited training. Seventeen DXA centers (30 %) reported performing routine precision assessment.

Conclusions: Many DXA centers reported using practices that meet minimal standards for DXA reporting and preparation; however, the lack of standardization, even within an integrated healthcare system, indicates an opportunity for quality improvement to ensure consistent high quality bone mineral density evaluation of Veterans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
期刊最新文献
Predicting bone mineral content from smartphone digital anthropometrics: evaluation of an existing application and the development of new prediction models Moving towards an equitable future: Rethinking the use of race in pediatric densitometry Comparison of the Effect of Selective Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors on Bone Mineral Density with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Healthy Controls Opportunistic Screening for Low Bone Mineral Density in Routine Computed Tomography Scans: A Brazilian Validation Study Canadian adult reference data for body composition, trabecular bone score and advanced hip analysis using DXA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1