评估基于神经网络的拓扑优化衍生物

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Mechanical Design Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1115/1.4064243
Joel C. Najmon, Andres Tovar
{"title":"评估基于神经网络的拓扑优化衍生物","authors":"Joel C. Najmon, Andres Tovar","doi":"10.1115/1.4064243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Neural networks have gained popularity for modeling complex non-linear relationships. Their computational efficiency has led to their growing adoption in optimization methods, including topology optimization. Recently, there have been several contributions towards improving derivatives of neural network outputs, which can improve their use in gradient-based optimization. However, a comparative study has yet to be conducted on the different derivative methods for the sensitivity of the input features on the neural network outputs. This paper aims to evaluate four derivative methods: analytical neural network's Jacobian, central finite difference method, complex step method, and automatic differentiation. These methods are implemented into density-based and homogenization-based topology optimization using multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). For density-based topology optimization, the MLP approximates Young's modulus for the solid-isotropic-material-with-penalization (SIMP) model. For homogenization-based topology optimization, the MLP approximates the homogenized stiffness tensor of a representative volume element, e.g., square cell microstructure with a rectangular hole. The comparative study is performed by solving two-dimensional topology optimization problems using the sensitivity coefficients from each derivative method. Evaluation includes initial sensitivity coefficients, convergence plots, and the final topologies, compliance, and design variables. The findings demonstrate that neural network-based sensitivity coefficients are sufficient for density-based and homogenization-based topology optimization. The neural network's Jacobian, complex step method, and automatic differentiation produced identical sensitivity coefficients to working precision. The study's open-source code is provided through an included Python repository.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Neural Network-based Derivatives for Topology Optimization\",\"authors\":\"Joel C. Najmon, Andres Tovar\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Neural networks have gained popularity for modeling complex non-linear relationships. Their computational efficiency has led to their growing adoption in optimization methods, including topology optimization. Recently, there have been several contributions towards improving derivatives of neural network outputs, which can improve their use in gradient-based optimization. However, a comparative study has yet to be conducted on the different derivative methods for the sensitivity of the input features on the neural network outputs. This paper aims to evaluate four derivative methods: analytical neural network's Jacobian, central finite difference method, complex step method, and automatic differentiation. These methods are implemented into density-based and homogenization-based topology optimization using multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). For density-based topology optimization, the MLP approximates Young's modulus for the solid-isotropic-material-with-penalization (SIMP) model. For homogenization-based topology optimization, the MLP approximates the homogenized stiffness tensor of a representative volume element, e.g., square cell microstructure with a rectangular hole. The comparative study is performed by solving two-dimensional topology optimization problems using the sensitivity coefficients from each derivative method. Evaluation includes initial sensitivity coefficients, convergence plots, and the final topologies, compliance, and design variables. The findings demonstrate that neural network-based sensitivity coefficients are sufficient for density-based and homogenization-based topology optimization. The neural network's Jacobian, complex step method, and automatic differentiation produced identical sensitivity coefficients to working precision. The study's open-source code is provided through an included Python repository.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经网络在建模复杂的非线性关系方面得到了广泛的应用。它们的计算效率使得它们越来越多地应用于优化方法,包括拓扑优化。最近,在改进神经网络输出的导数方面有了一些贡献,这可以提高它们在基于梯度的优化中的应用。然而,对于输入特征对神经网络输出的敏感性,不同的导数方法尚未进行比较研究。本文旨在评价四种导数方法:解析神经网络的雅可比矩阵、中心有限差分法、复阶法和自动微分法。利用多层感知器(mlp)将这些方法实现为基于密度的拓扑优化和基于均质化的拓扑优化。对于基于密度的拓扑优化,MLP近似于带有惩罚的固体各向同性材料(SIMP)模型的杨氏模量。对于基于均匀化的拓扑优化,MLP近似于具有代表性的体积单元的均匀化刚度张量,例如具有矩形孔的方形细胞微观结构。利用各导数方法的灵敏度系数求解二维拓扑优化问题,进行了对比研究。评估包括初始灵敏度系数、收敛图、最终拓扑、顺应性和设计变量。研究结果表明,基于神经网络的灵敏度系数足以用于基于密度和均质化的拓扑优化。神经网络的雅可比矩阵法、复阶法和自动微分法对工作精度产生相同的敏感系数。该研究的开源代码是通过包含的Python存储库提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Neural Network-based Derivatives for Topology Optimization
Neural networks have gained popularity for modeling complex non-linear relationships. Their computational efficiency has led to their growing adoption in optimization methods, including topology optimization. Recently, there have been several contributions towards improving derivatives of neural network outputs, which can improve their use in gradient-based optimization. However, a comparative study has yet to be conducted on the different derivative methods for the sensitivity of the input features on the neural network outputs. This paper aims to evaluate four derivative methods: analytical neural network's Jacobian, central finite difference method, complex step method, and automatic differentiation. These methods are implemented into density-based and homogenization-based topology optimization using multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). For density-based topology optimization, the MLP approximates Young's modulus for the solid-isotropic-material-with-penalization (SIMP) model. For homogenization-based topology optimization, the MLP approximates the homogenized stiffness tensor of a representative volume element, e.g., square cell microstructure with a rectangular hole. The comparative study is performed by solving two-dimensional topology optimization problems using the sensitivity coefficients from each derivative method. Evaluation includes initial sensitivity coefficients, convergence plots, and the final topologies, compliance, and design variables. The findings demonstrate that neural network-based sensitivity coefficients are sufficient for density-based and homogenization-based topology optimization. The neural network's Jacobian, complex step method, and automatic differentiation produced identical sensitivity coefficients to working precision. The study's open-source code is provided through an included Python repository.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanical Design
Journal of Mechanical Design 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials. Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Joint Special Issue on Advances in Design and Manufacturing for Sustainability Optimization of Tooth Profile Modification Amount and Manufacturing Tolerance Allocation for RV Reducer under Reliability Constraint Critical thinking assessment in engineering education: A Scopus-based literature review Accounting for Machine Learning Prediction Errors in Design Thinking Beyond the Default User: The Impact of Gender, Stereotypes, and Modality on Interpretation of User Needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1