社会教育学学生的复原力、技术压力和反思能力之间的关联:结构方程建模方法

Aigerim Baisarinova, Rymshash Toleubekova
{"title":"社会教育学学生的复原力、技术压力和反思能力之间的关联:结构方程建模方法","authors":"Aigerim Baisarinova, Rymshash Toleubekova","doi":"10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding factors affecting student academic and life outcomes may be critical for social work programs and educational institutions. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationships   between resilience, technostress   and reflective capacity among social work students. A cross-sectional non-experimental research design was used. One hundred and sixty-three social work students completed an online survey measuring technostress level, reflective capacity and psychological resilience. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s to estimate linear correlations, confirmatory factor analysis to ensure model fit and structural equation modeling with covariates to reveal the relationships between the measured constructs. The results indicated that resilience had a direct and negative effect on technostress, a positive and direct effect on reflective capacity and a negative indirect effect on technostress through reflective capacity. This means that social work students with higher levels of resilience had lower levels of technostress related to technology use were more likely to engage in reflective practices and had lower levels of technostress due to improved reflective capacity. These findings emphasize the significance of resilience and reflective practices in mitigating the negative effects of technology use among social work students. However, researchers should be cautious about generalizing findings due to the sample’s limitations and future investigations should consider longitudinal data from diverse populations.","PeriodicalId":36689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research","volume":"128 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between resilience, technostress and reflective capacity in social pedagogy students: A structural equation modeling methodology\",\"authors\":\"Aigerim Baisarinova, Rymshash Toleubekova\",\"doi\":\"10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding factors affecting student academic and life outcomes may be critical for social work programs and educational institutions. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationships   between resilience, technostress   and reflective capacity among social work students. A cross-sectional non-experimental research design was used. One hundred and sixty-three social work students completed an online survey measuring technostress level, reflective capacity and psychological resilience. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s to estimate linear correlations, confirmatory factor analysis to ensure model fit and structural equation modeling with covariates to reveal the relationships between the measured constructs. The results indicated that resilience had a direct and negative effect on technostress, a positive and direct effect on reflective capacity and a negative indirect effect on technostress through reflective capacity. This means that social work students with higher levels of resilience had lower levels of technostress related to technology use were more likely to engage in reflective practices and had lower levels of technostress due to improved reflective capacity. These findings emphasize the significance of resilience and reflective practices in mitigating the negative effects of technology use among social work students. However, researchers should be cautious about generalizing findings due to the sample’s limitations and future investigations should consider longitudinal data from diverse populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research\",\"volume\":\"128 26\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解影响学生学业和生活结果的因素可能对社会工作项目和教育机构至关重要。因此,本研究旨在探讨社会工作学生心理弹性、技术压力与反思能力之间的关系。采用横断面非实验研究设计。163名社会工作专业的学生完成了一项在线调查,测量技术压力水平、反思能力和心理弹性。数据分析使用Pearson’s来估计线性相关性,验证性因子分析来确保模型拟合,并使用协变量进行结构方程建模来揭示测量结构之间的关系。结果表明,弹性对技术应激有直接和负向的影响,对反思能力有积极和直接的影响,并通过反思能力对技术应激有负向的间接影响。这意味着具有较高弹性水平的社会工作学生与技术使用相关的技术压力水平较低,更有可能参与反思实践,并且由于提高了反思能力而具有较低的技术压力水平。这些发现强调了弹性和反思实践在减轻社会工作学生使用技术的负面影响方面的重要性。然而,由于样本的局限性,研究人员在推广研究结果时应谨慎,未来的调查应考虑来自不同人群的纵向数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between resilience, technostress and reflective capacity in social pedagogy students: A structural equation modeling methodology
Understanding factors affecting student academic and life outcomes may be critical for social work programs and educational institutions. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationships   between resilience, technostress   and reflective capacity among social work students. A cross-sectional non-experimental research design was used. One hundred and sixty-three social work students completed an online survey measuring technostress level, reflective capacity and psychological resilience. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s to estimate linear correlations, confirmatory factor analysis to ensure model fit and structural equation modeling with covariates to reveal the relationships between the measured constructs. The results indicated that resilience had a direct and negative effect on technostress, a positive and direct effect on reflective capacity and a negative indirect effect on technostress through reflective capacity. This means that social work students with higher levels of resilience had lower levels of technostress related to technology use were more likely to engage in reflective practices and had lower levels of technostress due to improved reflective capacity. These findings emphasize the significance of resilience and reflective practices in mitigating the negative effects of technology use among social work students. However, researchers should be cautious about generalizing findings due to the sample’s limitations and future investigations should consider longitudinal data from diverse populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Developing a model for life skills training through the enhancement of academic, personal, social, and career competencies for middle school students Psychosocial barriers to promoting self-directed and autonomous learning: The perception of students and lecturers in Malaysia Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and knowledge of online learning for students with disabilities in Saudi Arabia Moving beyond the challenges of learning through technologies: The current status of ICT integration in South African schools Biology teaching that develops the metacognitive aspect of learning: How to learn competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1