基于能力的课程设置方法:中俄商业职业教育与培训课程比较分析

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Comparative and International Education Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1177/17454999231219840
Pujun Chen, A. Goncharova, Junmin Li, D. Frommberger
{"title":"基于能力的课程设置方法:中俄商业职业教育与培训课程比较分析","authors":"Pujun Chen, A. Goncharova, Junmin Li, D. Frommberger","doi":"10.1177/17454999231219840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, Competence-Based Education (CBE), which emerges to promote the competence development of learners, has been recognized as a pivotal framework, initiating paradigm shifts in Vocational Education and Training (VET) across the globe. Notwithstanding critiques regarding conceptual limitations and its association with neoliberal models of education, the concept of CBE is widely adopted in the VET systems of many countries. However, there is the dearth of empirical evidence about how this concept is implemented into educational practice within the national VET contexts, in which the CBE concept is introduced and regarded as initiative of VET modernization. Against this background, this study investigates the implementation of the approaches to competence orientation (also called competence-based approaches, abbr. CBA) in the curricula of commercial VET programmes in China and Russia, specifically focussing on Accounting and Logistics. Through qualitative content analysis, the study illuminates features of the CBA embedded in curricular documents at both national and institutional levels within these countries. The comparison of the results highlights potential similarities and distinctions regarding the realization of the CBE concept into educational practice of VET between both countries. The comparative findings reveal significant alignment with labour market needs, yet differences emerge in the principles regarding competence-based teaching and learning between both countries. While Chinese VET programmes showcase more individualized embedment of the CBA in different institutions, greater standardization of the CBA embedment evident in Russian VET curricula. These findings underscore the influence of national contexts in shaping the interpretation and application of global educational trends, offering nuanced insights for policymakers and educators looking to optimize the realisation of the CBA within VET curricula.","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"93 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competence-based approach in curriculum: A comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese commercial vocational education and training programmes\",\"authors\":\"Pujun Chen, A. Goncharova, Junmin Li, D. Frommberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17454999231219840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, Competence-Based Education (CBE), which emerges to promote the competence development of learners, has been recognized as a pivotal framework, initiating paradigm shifts in Vocational Education and Training (VET) across the globe. Notwithstanding critiques regarding conceptual limitations and its association with neoliberal models of education, the concept of CBE is widely adopted in the VET systems of many countries. However, there is the dearth of empirical evidence about how this concept is implemented into educational practice within the national VET contexts, in which the CBE concept is introduced and regarded as initiative of VET modernization. Against this background, this study investigates the implementation of the approaches to competence orientation (also called competence-based approaches, abbr. CBA) in the curricula of commercial VET programmes in China and Russia, specifically focussing on Accounting and Logistics. Through qualitative content analysis, the study illuminates features of the CBA embedded in curricular documents at both national and institutional levels within these countries. The comparison of the results highlights potential similarities and distinctions regarding the realization of the CBE concept into educational practice of VET between both countries. The comparative findings reveal significant alignment with labour market needs, yet differences emerge in the principles regarding competence-based teaching and learning between both countries. While Chinese VET programmes showcase more individualized embedment of the CBA in different institutions, greater standardization of the CBA embedment evident in Russian VET curricula. These findings underscore the influence of national contexts in shaping the interpretation and application of global educational trends, offering nuanced insights for policymakers and educators looking to optimize the realisation of the CBA within VET curricula.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"volume\":\"93 26\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231219840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231219840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,促进学习者能力发展的能力教育(CBE)已被认为是一个关键框架,引发了全球职业教育与培训(VET)的范式转变。尽管有关于概念局限性及其与新自由主义教育模式的联系的批评,CBE的概念在许多国家的职业教育教育体系中被广泛采用。然而,关于如何在国家职业教育背景下将这一概念实施到教育实践中,缺乏经验证据,在国家职业教育背景下,CBE概念被引入并被视为职业教育现代化的倡议。在此背景下,本研究调查了能力导向方法(也称为基于能力的方法,缩写为CBA)在中国和俄罗斯商业职业教育培训课程中的实施情况,特别关注会计和物流。通过定性的内容分析,本研究阐明了这些国家在国家和机构层面的课程文件中嵌入CBA的特点。结果的比较突出了两国在将CBE理念落实到职业教育实践中的潜在异同。比较结果显示,两国在劳动力市场需求方面存在显著一致性,但在基于能力的教学原则方面存在差异。虽然中国的职业教育培训项目在不同的机构中展示了更多个性化的CBA嵌入,但在俄罗斯的职业教育培训课程中,CBA嵌入的标准化程度更高。这些发现强调了国家背景对全球教育趋势的解释和应用的影响,为政策制定者和教育工作者提供了细致入微的见解,希望在职业教育培训课程中优化CBA的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competence-based approach in curriculum: A comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese commercial vocational education and training programmes
In recent decades, Competence-Based Education (CBE), which emerges to promote the competence development of learners, has been recognized as a pivotal framework, initiating paradigm shifts in Vocational Education and Training (VET) across the globe. Notwithstanding critiques regarding conceptual limitations and its association with neoliberal models of education, the concept of CBE is widely adopted in the VET systems of many countries. However, there is the dearth of empirical evidence about how this concept is implemented into educational practice within the national VET contexts, in which the CBE concept is introduced and regarded as initiative of VET modernization. Against this background, this study investigates the implementation of the approaches to competence orientation (also called competence-based approaches, abbr. CBA) in the curricula of commercial VET programmes in China and Russia, specifically focussing on Accounting and Logistics. Through qualitative content analysis, the study illuminates features of the CBA embedded in curricular documents at both national and institutional levels within these countries. The comparison of the results highlights potential similarities and distinctions regarding the realization of the CBE concept into educational practice of VET between both countries. The comparative findings reveal significant alignment with labour market needs, yet differences emerge in the principles regarding competence-based teaching and learning between both countries. While Chinese VET programmes showcase more individualized embedment of the CBA in different institutions, greater standardization of the CBA embedment evident in Russian VET curricula. These findings underscore the influence of national contexts in shaping the interpretation and application of global educational trends, offering nuanced insights for policymakers and educators looking to optimize the realisation of the CBA within VET curricula.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
期刊最新文献
The adoption of dual Vocational Education and Training in Spain: Analysis of descentralised decision-making in educational policy transfer International partnership of Japanese university: Reciprocity and stratification of study abroad Factors that play a role in international PhD candidates’ social experiences with inclusion and integration in an international learning environment: A narrative inquiry in a Dutch research university Lifelong education policies in Europe and Latin America Looking at Ukrainian technical and vocational education and training before the war: Consequences of a meritocratic orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1