莫尔 1535 年写给邦维西的信中的书信箴言和友谊表达

IF 0.1 N/A MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES MOREANA Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.3366/more.2023.0152
Benjamin V. Beier
{"title":"莫尔 1535 年写给邦维西的信中的书信箴言和友谊表达","authors":"Benjamin V. Beier","doi":"10.3366/more.2023.0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay examines More’s 1535 letter to Antonio Bonvisi. It compares the epistle, as a whole and in its salutation and valediction, with the humanist epistolary conventions expressed by Erasmus and discovers that More often, but not always, ignores Erasmian precepts. The essay argues that More’s rhetorical choices deepen our understanding of his enactment of friendship in the letter and of More’s self-understanding near the end of his life.","PeriodicalId":41939,"journal":{"name":"MOREANA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epistolary precepts and the expressions of friendship in More’s 1535 letter to Bonvisi\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin V. Beier\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/more.2023.0152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay examines More’s 1535 letter to Antonio Bonvisi. It compares the epistle, as a whole and in its salutation and valediction, with the humanist epistolary conventions expressed by Erasmus and discovers that More often, but not always, ignores Erasmian precepts. The essay argues that More’s rhetorical choices deepen our understanding of his enactment of friendship in the letter and of More’s self-understanding near the end of his life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MOREANA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MOREANA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/more.2023.0152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOREANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/more.2023.0152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章考察了莫尔1535年写给安东尼奥·邦维斯的信。它将书信作为一个整体,在它的敬礼和告别中,与伊拉斯谟表达的人文主义书信惯例进行了比较,发现更多时候,但并非总是,忽略了伊拉斯谟的戒律。本文认为莫尔的修辞选择加深了我们对他在信中所塑造的友谊的理解,以及他在生命末期的自我理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epistolary precepts and the expressions of friendship in More’s 1535 letter to Bonvisi
The essay examines More’s 1535 letter to Antonio Bonvisi. It compares the epistle, as a whole and in its salutation and valediction, with the humanist epistolary conventions expressed by Erasmus and discovers that More often, but not always, ignores Erasmian precepts. The essay argues that More’s rhetorical choices deepen our understanding of his enactment of friendship in the letter and of More’s self-understanding near the end of his life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MOREANA
MOREANA MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
A brief discussion of the differences in the four inscriptions of More’s Utopia G. W. Bernard, Who Ruled Tudor England: An Essay in the Paradoxes of PowerLucy Wooding, Tudor England: A History The Milk Street mystery: Thomas More’s birthplace Lyric, lovers, and limitlessness: Shakespeare’s quarrel with time in Sonnet 55 The politics of Thomas More's A Dialogue of Comfort against Tribulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1