制度逻辑:激励行动,克服变革阻力

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1017/mor.2023.22
Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, Danyang Li
{"title":"制度逻辑:激励行动,克服变革阻力","authors":"Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, Danyang Li","doi":"10.1017/mor.2023.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Institutional logics are interrelated sets of cultural elements (norms, values, beliefs, and symbols) that help people and organizations make sense of their everyday activities and order those activities in time and space. In this paper, we describe the rise of a robust literature on institutional logics, which mostly focuses on Western societies. We then describe changes in Chinese society and economy over the past four decades, as it shifted from state-controlled planning and redistribution to market-mediated exchange. We detail how the institutional logics that guide Chinese firms have been transformed in the wake of the economic transition. The state logic, which developed in the Maoist era, valorizes equality, national community, and political stability. Although it is still in evidence, it has been partly supplanted by a market logic that encourages efficiency, competition, and property rights. But this market logic differs from the one that prevails in Western capitalist economies. The Chinese version of the market logic valorizes the central role that the state and the Communist Party continue to play in economic life. Therefore, in the Chinese version of the market logic, efficiency, competition, and property rights are tempered by a continued concern for political stability. We review and summarize the existing literature on institutional logics and Chinese firms, and then identify fruitful lines that future research could take.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change\",\"authors\":\"Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, Danyang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/mor.2023.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Institutional logics are interrelated sets of cultural elements (norms, values, beliefs, and symbols) that help people and organizations make sense of their everyday activities and order those activities in time and space. In this paper, we describe the rise of a robust literature on institutional logics, which mostly focuses on Western societies. We then describe changes in Chinese society and economy over the past four decades, as it shifted from state-controlled planning and redistribution to market-mediated exchange. We detail how the institutional logics that guide Chinese firms have been transformed in the wake of the economic transition. The state logic, which developed in the Maoist era, valorizes equality, national community, and political stability. Although it is still in evidence, it has been partly supplanted by a market logic that encourages efficiency, competition, and property rights. But this market logic differs from the one that prevails in Western capitalist economies. The Chinese version of the market logic valorizes the central role that the state and the Communist Party continue to play in economic life. Therefore, in the Chinese version of the market logic, efficiency, competition, and property rights are tempered by a continued concern for political stability. We review and summarize the existing literature on institutional logics and Chinese firms, and then identify fruitful lines that future research could take.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management and Organization Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management and Organization Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制度逻辑是一组相互关联的文化元素(规范、价值观、信仰和符号),它们帮助人们和组织理解他们的日常活动,并在时间和空间上安排这些活动。在本文中,我们描述了关于制度逻辑的大量文献的兴起,这些文献主要集中在西方社会。然后,我们描述了中国社会和经济在过去四十年中的变化,因为它从国家控制的计划和再分配转变为市场调节的交换。我们详细介绍了引导中国企业的制度逻辑是如何随着经济转型而转变的。毛时代发展起来的国家逻辑强调平等、民族共同体和政治稳定。尽管它仍然存在,但它已部分被鼓励效率、竞争和产权的市场逻辑所取代。但这种市场逻辑不同于西方资本主义经济中盛行的逻辑。中国版的市场逻辑强调了国家和共产党在经济生活中继续发挥的核心作用。因此,在中国版本的市场逻辑中,效率、竞争和产权受到对政治稳定的持续关注的制约。我们回顾和总结了制度逻辑和中国企业的现有文献,然后确定了未来研究可以采取的富有成效的路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change
Institutional logics are interrelated sets of cultural elements (norms, values, beliefs, and symbols) that help people and organizations make sense of their everyday activities and order those activities in time and space. In this paper, we describe the rise of a robust literature on institutional logics, which mostly focuses on Western societies. We then describe changes in Chinese society and economy over the past four decades, as it shifted from state-controlled planning and redistribution to market-mediated exchange. We detail how the institutional logics that guide Chinese firms have been transformed in the wake of the economic transition. The state logic, which developed in the Maoist era, valorizes equality, national community, and political stability. Although it is still in evidence, it has been partly supplanted by a market logic that encourages efficiency, competition, and property rights. But this market logic differs from the one that prevails in Western capitalist economies. The Chinese version of the market logic valorizes the central role that the state and the Communist Party continue to play in economic life. Therefore, in the Chinese version of the market logic, efficiency, competition, and property rights are tempered by a continued concern for political stability. We review and summarize the existing literature on institutional logics and Chinese firms, and then identify fruitful lines that future research could take.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Follow the Giver: Is Chinese MNEs’ Investment in Africa Linked to Official Aid? Local Gambling Culture and Enterprise Bribery: A Social Norms Theory Perspective Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Multiple Large Shareholders, Identity, and Corporate Tax Avoidance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1