{"title":"中国稻田甲烷排放减缓措施荟萃分析","authors":"Ning Ma , Xiaojie Liu , Li Wang , Gang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mitigating methane emissions from the rice paddy in China proves to be one of the most vital approaches to achieving the global methane reduction target, but the heterogeneity and effectiveness of existing methane reduction strategies and the influencing factors of their mitigation effects remain not systematically explored for China. We employed a meta-analysis to evaluate ten identified methane mitigation technologies in China, based on field experiments data. We show the methane mitigation effects vary in descending order, as water-fertilizer coupling management > water management > tillage management > fertilizer management. In particular, the water-fertilizer coupling management could reach a reduction of 67.27 %, which is markedly higher than employing singular practices and eliminates the “trade-off” among individual reduction measures. Overall, the mitigation effects are subject to various factors, such as experimental year, soil pH, and precipitation, leading to varying effectiveness across regions. Intermittent irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation have high abatement potential in southern China, while urea and variety yield better results in northern China. Although China's methane reduction efforts are at the forefront among Asian countries, the potentially exacerbating methane leakage issues due to its increasing import of rice from Southeast Asia deserve a special focus as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107379"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis on the mitigation measures of methane emissions in Chinese rice paddy\",\"authors\":\"Ning Ma , Xiaojie Liu , Li Wang , Gang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Mitigating methane emissions from the rice paddy in China proves to be one of the most vital approaches to achieving the global methane reduction target, but the heterogeneity and effectiveness of existing methane reduction strategies and the influencing factors of their mitigation effects remain not systematically explored for China. We employed a meta-analysis to evaluate ten identified methane mitigation technologies in China, based on field experiments data. We show the methane mitigation effects vary in descending order, as water-fertilizer coupling management > water management > tillage management > fertilizer management. In particular, the water-fertilizer coupling management could reach a reduction of 67.27 %, which is markedly higher than employing singular practices and eliminates the “trade-off” among individual reduction measures. Overall, the mitigation effects are subject to various factors, such as experimental year, soil pH, and precipitation, leading to varying effectiveness across regions. Intermittent irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation have high abatement potential in southern China, while urea and variety yield better results in northern China. Although China's methane reduction efforts are at the forefront among Asian countries, the potentially exacerbating methane leakage issues due to its increasing import of rice from Southeast Asia deserve a special focus as well.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492300513X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492300513X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A meta-analysis on the mitigation measures of methane emissions in Chinese rice paddy
Mitigating methane emissions from the rice paddy in China proves to be one of the most vital approaches to achieving the global methane reduction target, but the heterogeneity and effectiveness of existing methane reduction strategies and the influencing factors of their mitigation effects remain not systematically explored for China. We employed a meta-analysis to evaluate ten identified methane mitigation technologies in China, based on field experiments data. We show the methane mitigation effects vary in descending order, as water-fertilizer coupling management > water management > tillage management > fertilizer management. In particular, the water-fertilizer coupling management could reach a reduction of 67.27 %, which is markedly higher than employing singular practices and eliminates the “trade-off” among individual reduction measures. Overall, the mitigation effects are subject to various factors, such as experimental year, soil pH, and precipitation, leading to varying effectiveness across regions. Intermittent irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation have high abatement potential in southern China, while urea and variety yield better results in northern China. Although China's methane reduction efforts are at the forefront among Asian countries, the potentially exacerbating methane leakage issues due to its increasing import of rice from Southeast Asia deserve a special focus as well.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.