开启写作成功之门:通过有效干预培养学生和教师的评估素养

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2023-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100804
Hanieh Shafiee Rad , Rasoul Alipour
{"title":"开启写作成功之门:通过有效干预培养学生和教师的评估素养","authors":"Hanieh Shafiee Rad ,&nbsp;Rasoul Alipour","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a prerequisite for effective teaching and learning outcomes, assessment literacy (AL) is imperative for both writing teachers and students. Although previous research has stressed the importance of AL in effective writing instruction, few studies have designed or explored interventions that can improve teachers' and students' AL. These interventions play a crucial role in equipping writing teachers with the necessary skills to effectively comprehend, apply, interpret, and critique assessments. Likewise, AL interventions are essential for writing students, as they enhance their knowledge, attitudes, actions, and critique of assessments, enabling them to understand assessment purposes, utilize feedback constructively, and critically evaluate assessment practices. In order to address this gap in the literature, the researchers employed a mixed-method approach, which included pre- and post-tests, as well as semistructured interviews, to design and investigate effective interventions for enhancing AL. For the purpose of this study, we incorporated a four-dimensional conceptual framework for teachers' intervention and a four-phase AL framework for students' intervention as the basis for our investigation. According to the study findings, there were significant disparities between students' writing skills and their writing abilities while also substantial improvements in teachers' writing abilities following intervention. A positive perception of the intervention was also reported by both students and teachers. Thus, these interventions were able to assist students in better understanding assessment criteria and help teachers provide feedback in an effective manner. By implementing effective interventions, students, as well as teachers, will be equipped with the necessary tools to support writing instruction and ultimately achieve higher levels of achievement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 100804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001125/pdfft?md5=af49e9a93aef41309bcf0e49d8949672&pid=1-s2.0-S1075293523001125-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking writing success: Building assessment literacy for students and teachers through effective interventions\",\"authors\":\"Hanieh Shafiee Rad ,&nbsp;Rasoul Alipour\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2023.100804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As a prerequisite for effective teaching and learning outcomes, assessment literacy (AL) is imperative for both writing teachers and students. Although previous research has stressed the importance of AL in effective writing instruction, few studies have designed or explored interventions that can improve teachers' and students' AL. These interventions play a crucial role in equipping writing teachers with the necessary skills to effectively comprehend, apply, interpret, and critique assessments. Likewise, AL interventions are essential for writing students, as they enhance their knowledge, attitudes, actions, and critique of assessments, enabling them to understand assessment purposes, utilize feedback constructively, and critically evaluate assessment practices. In order to address this gap in the literature, the researchers employed a mixed-method approach, which included pre- and post-tests, as well as semistructured interviews, to design and investigate effective interventions for enhancing AL. For the purpose of this study, we incorporated a four-dimensional conceptual framework for teachers' intervention and a four-phase AL framework for students' intervention as the basis for our investigation. According to the study findings, there were significant disparities between students' writing skills and their writing abilities while also substantial improvements in teachers' writing abilities following intervention. A positive perception of the intervention was also reported by both students and teachers. Thus, these interventions were able to assist students in better understanding assessment criteria and help teachers provide feedback in an effective manner. By implementing effective interventions, students, as well as teachers, will be equipped with the necessary tools to support writing instruction and ultimately achieve higher levels of achievement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"59 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001125/pdfft?md5=af49e9a93aef41309bcf0e49d8949672&pid=1-s2.0-S1075293523001125-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001125\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523001125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为有效教学和学习成果的先决条件,写作教师和学生都必须具备评估素养(AL)。尽管以往的研究已经强调了评估素养在有效写作教学中的重要性,但很少有研究设计或探索能够提高教师和学生评估素养的干预措施。这些干预措施在帮助写作教师掌握有效理解、应用、解释和批判评估所需的技能方面起着至关重要的作用。同样,AL 干预措施对于写作学生来说也是至关重要的,因为这些措施可以增强他们对评估的认识、态度、行动和批判,使他们能够理解评估的目的,建设性地利用反馈,并批判性地评价评估实践。为了解决文献中的这一空白,研究人员采用了一种混合方法,包括前测和后测,以及半结构式访谈,来设计和研究提高 AL 的有效干预措施。在本研究中,我们将教师干预的四维概念框架和学生干预的四阶段 AL 框架作为调查的基础。研究结果表明,学生的写作能力与教师的写作能力之间存在着明显的差距,而教师的写作能力在干预后也有了很大的提高。学生和教师对干预措施也有积极的看法。因此,这些干预措施能够帮助学生更好地理解评价标准,并帮助教师以有效的方式提供反馈。通过实施有效的干预措施,学生和教师将掌握必要的工具来支持写作教学,并最终取得更高的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unlocking writing success: Building assessment literacy for students and teachers through effective interventions

As a prerequisite for effective teaching and learning outcomes, assessment literacy (AL) is imperative for both writing teachers and students. Although previous research has stressed the importance of AL in effective writing instruction, few studies have designed or explored interventions that can improve teachers' and students' AL. These interventions play a crucial role in equipping writing teachers with the necessary skills to effectively comprehend, apply, interpret, and critique assessments. Likewise, AL interventions are essential for writing students, as they enhance their knowledge, attitudes, actions, and critique of assessments, enabling them to understand assessment purposes, utilize feedback constructively, and critically evaluate assessment practices. In order to address this gap in the literature, the researchers employed a mixed-method approach, which included pre- and post-tests, as well as semistructured interviews, to design and investigate effective interventions for enhancing AL. For the purpose of this study, we incorporated a four-dimensional conceptual framework for teachers' intervention and a four-phase AL framework for students' intervention as the basis for our investigation. According to the study findings, there were significant disparities between students' writing skills and their writing abilities while also substantial improvements in teachers' writing abilities following intervention. A positive perception of the intervention was also reported by both students and teachers. Thus, these interventions were able to assist students in better understanding assessment criteria and help teachers provide feedback in an effective manner. By implementing effective interventions, students, as well as teachers, will be equipped with the necessary tools to support writing instruction and ultimately achieve higher levels of achievement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers Effects of a genre and topic knowledge activation device on a standardized writing test performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1