Laurie Lachance, Barbara L Brush, Graciela Mentz, Shoou-Yih D Lee, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Chris M Coombe, Ricardo DeMajo, Adena Gabrysiak, Megan Jensen, Angela G Reyes, Zachary Rowe, Amy J Schulz, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Barbara A Israel
{"title":"验证伙伴关系成功衡量方法(MAPS)问卷。","authors":"Laurie Lachance, Barbara L Brush, Graciela Mentz, Shoou-Yih D Lee, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Chris M Coombe, Ricardo DeMajo, Adena Gabrysiak, Megan Jensen, Angela G Reyes, Zachary Rowe, Amy J Schulz, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Barbara A Israel","doi":"10.1177/10901981231213352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conceptualizing and testing factors that contribute to the success of community-academic partnerships are critical to understanding their contributions to the health and well-being of communities. Most measures to date focus on factors that contribute to the development of <i>new</i> partnerships, and only a few have been adequately tested and validated. <i>Methods.</i> The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and a multiphase process that included the construction and pilot testing of a questionnaire, and a national survey to validate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in long-standing CBPR partnerships (existing ≥ six years). All members within partnerships were recruited to complete the survey (55 partnerships with 563 partners). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha statistics, and a pairwise correlations approach to assess discriminant and convergent validity, and assessed internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. <i>Results.</i> All MAPS Questionnaire dimensions demonstrated strong validity and reliability and demonstrated agreement over time. <i>Conclusion.</i> The MAPS Questionnaire includes seven dimensions and 81 items related to the MAPS conceptual model and provides a scientific, in-depth measurement tool that allows long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"218-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Lachance, Barbara L Brush, Graciela Mentz, Shoou-Yih D Lee, P Paul Chandanabhumma, Chris M Coombe, Ricardo DeMajo, Adena Gabrysiak, Megan Jensen, Angela G Reyes, Zachary Rowe, Amy J Schulz, Eliza Wilson-Powers, Barbara A Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10901981231213352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Conceptualizing and testing factors that contribute to the success of community-academic partnerships are critical to understanding their contributions to the health and well-being of communities. Most measures to date focus on factors that contribute to the development of <i>new</i> partnerships, and only a few have been adequately tested and validated. <i>Methods.</i> The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and a multiphase process that included the construction and pilot testing of a questionnaire, and a national survey to validate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in long-standing CBPR partnerships (existing ≥ six years). All members within partnerships were recruited to complete the survey (55 partnerships with 563 partners). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha statistics, and a pairwise correlations approach to assess discriminant and convergent validity, and assessed internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. <i>Results.</i> All MAPS Questionnaire dimensions demonstrated strong validity and reliability and demonstrated agreement over time. <i>Conclusion.</i> The MAPS Questionnaire includes seven dimensions and 81 items related to the MAPS conceptual model and provides a scientific, in-depth measurement tool that allows long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education & Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981231213352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981231213352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire.
Conceptualizing and testing factors that contribute to the success of community-academic partnerships are critical to understanding their contributions to the health and well-being of communities. Most measures to date focus on factors that contribute to the development of new partnerships, and only a few have been adequately tested and validated. Methods. The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and a multiphase process that included the construction and pilot testing of a questionnaire, and a national survey to validate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in long-standing CBPR partnerships (existing ≥ six years). All members within partnerships were recruited to complete the survey (55 partnerships with 563 partners). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha statistics, and a pairwise correlations approach to assess discriminant and convergent validity, and assessed internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Results. All MAPS Questionnaire dimensions demonstrated strong validity and reliability and demonstrated agreement over time. Conclusion. The MAPS Questionnaire includes seven dimensions and 81 items related to the MAPS conceptual model and provides a scientific, in-depth measurement tool that allows long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity.
期刊介绍:
Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.