Daniel J Stinner, Cory B McEvoy, Michael A Broussard, Aaron D Nikolaus, Charles H Parker, Hector Santana, Jason M Karnopp, Jigar A Patel
{"title":"蓝牙战术耳麦提高了准确移交病人的速度。","authors":"Daniel J Stinner, Cory B McEvoy, Michael A Broussard, Aaron D Nikolaus, Charles H Parker, Hector Santana, Jason M Karnopp, Jigar A Patel","doi":"10.55460/MAPM-TLNO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Committee on En Route Combat Casualty Care recently ranked the patient handoff as their fourth research priority. Bluetooth technology has been introduced to the battlefield and has the potential to improve the tactical patient handoff. The purpose of this study is to compare the traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation by Special Operations medical personnel (radio push-to-talk [PTT] and Tactical Medic Intercom System [TM-ICS]) to Bluetooth communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four simulated tactical patient handoffs were performed to compare Bluetooth and traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation. Patient scenario order and method of communication were randomized. Accuracy and time required to complete the patient handoff were determined. The study took place using a rotary-wing aircraft kept at level 2 to simulate real-world background noise. Preferred method of communication for each study participant was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in accuracy of the received patient handoffs between groups or patient handoff transmission times at the ramp of the aircraft. However, when comparing patient handoff times to the medical team within the aircraft, Bluetooth communication was significantly faster than both TM-ICS and radio PTT, while Bluetooth PTT and radio PTT were also significantly faster than TM-ICS. Bluetooth communication was ranked as the preferred method of handoff by all study participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that utilization of Bluetooth technology for patient handover results in faster handoffs compared with traditional methods without sacrificing any accuracy in a scenario with high levels of noise.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bluetooth Tactical Headsets Improve The Speed of Accurate Patient Handoffs.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Stinner, Cory B McEvoy, Michael A Broussard, Aaron D Nikolaus, Charles H Parker, Hector Santana, Jason M Karnopp, Jigar A Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/MAPM-TLNO\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Committee on En Route Combat Casualty Care recently ranked the patient handoff as their fourth research priority. Bluetooth technology has been introduced to the battlefield and has the potential to improve the tactical patient handoff. The purpose of this study is to compare the traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation by Special Operations medical personnel (radio push-to-talk [PTT] and Tactical Medic Intercom System [TM-ICS]) to Bluetooth communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four simulated tactical patient handoffs were performed to compare Bluetooth and traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation. Patient scenario order and method of communication were randomized. Accuracy and time required to complete the patient handoff were determined. The study took place using a rotary-wing aircraft kept at level 2 to simulate real-world background noise. Preferred method of communication for each study participant was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in accuracy of the received patient handoffs between groups or patient handoff transmission times at the ramp of the aircraft. However, when comparing patient handoff times to the medical team within the aircraft, Bluetooth communication was significantly faster than both TM-ICS and radio PTT, while Bluetooth PTT and radio PTT were also significantly faster than TM-ICS. Bluetooth communication was ranked as the preferred method of handoff by all study participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that utilization of Bluetooth technology for patient handover results in faster handoffs compared with traditional methods without sacrificing any accuracy in a scenario with high levels of noise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"75-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/MAPM-TLNO\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/MAPM-TLNO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:途中战斗伤员救护委员会最近将病人交接列为第四个研究重点。蓝牙技术已被引入战场,并有可能改善战术病人交接。本研究的目的是将特种作战医疗人员在战术医疗后送中使用的传统通信方法(无线电一键通 [PTT] 和战术医疗对讲系统 [TM-ICS])与蓝牙通信进行比较:方法:进行了 24 次模拟战术病人交接,以比较战术医疗后送中使用的蓝牙通信方法和传统通信方法。病人的情景顺序和通信方法是随机的。确定了完成病人交接的准确性和所需时间。研究使用了保持在 2 级的旋转翼飞机来模拟真实世界的背景噪声。确定了每位研究参与者的首选交流方式:结果:在飞机停机坪上,各组之间接收病人递送信息的准确性和病人递送信息的传输时间没有差异。然而,在飞机内与医疗小组进行病人交接时间比较时,蓝牙通信明显快于 TM-ICS 和无线电 PTT,而蓝牙 PTT 和无线电 PTT 也明显快于 TM-ICS。蓝牙通信被所有研究参与者列为首选的交接方法:研究结果表明,与传统方法相比,利用蓝牙技术进行病人交接速度更快,而且在高噪音环境下不会降低任何准确性。
Bluetooth Tactical Headsets Improve The Speed of Accurate Patient Handoffs.
Background: The Committee on En Route Combat Casualty Care recently ranked the patient handoff as their fourth research priority. Bluetooth technology has been introduced to the battlefield and has the potential to improve the tactical patient handoff. The purpose of this study is to compare the traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation by Special Operations medical personnel (radio push-to-talk [PTT] and Tactical Medic Intercom System [TM-ICS]) to Bluetooth communication.
Methods: Twenty-four simulated tactical patient handoffs were performed to compare Bluetooth and traditional methods of communication used in tactical medical evacuation. Patient scenario order and method of communication were randomized. Accuracy and time required to complete the patient handoff were determined. The study took place using a rotary-wing aircraft kept at level 2 to simulate real-world background noise. Preferred method of communication for each study participant was determined.
Results: There were no differences in accuracy of the received patient handoffs between groups or patient handoff transmission times at the ramp of the aircraft. However, when comparing patient handoff times to the medical team within the aircraft, Bluetooth communication was significantly faster than both TM-ICS and radio PTT, while Bluetooth PTT and radio PTT were also significantly faster than TM-ICS. Bluetooth communication was ranked as the preferred method of handoff by all study participants.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated that utilization of Bluetooth technology for patient handover results in faster handoffs compared with traditional methods without sacrificing any accuracy in a scenario with high levels of noise.