倾向性同情心以系统的方式改变了社会偏好。

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12896
Joseph Ocampo, Dacher Keltner
{"title":"倾向性同情心以系统的方式改变了社会偏好。","authors":"Joseph Ocampo,&nbsp;Dacher Keltner","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Introduction</b>: How people attach value to the outcomes of self and other—social preferences—is central to social behavior. Recently, how dispositional and state emotion shape such social preferences has received researchers' attention.<b>Method</b>: The present investigation asked whether and to what extent dispositional and state compassion predict shifts in social preferences across 4 samples: two correlational samples (final <i>n</i>s 153 &amp; 368, study 1a and 1b) and two experimental samples (final <i>n</i>s: 430 &amp; 530, studies 2 and 3).<b>Results</b>: In keeping with recent accounts of compassion, dispositional compassion predicted general preference for equality, expressed as dispreference for both monetary advantage over another (interaction <i>β</i>s = −0.36, −0.33, −0.25, −0.22; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and monetary disadvantage relative to others (<i>β</i>s: 0.26, 0.27, 0.28, 0.17; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; positive coefficients imply dispreference). This dispositional effect persisted when controlling for prosociality, positivity, agreeableness, and respectfulness. Furthermore, these dispositional compassion effects were relatively unchanged by experimental emotion inductions in studies 3 and 4. The experimental inductions of state compassion and state pride showed little evidence of systematic effects on social preferences relative to each other or a neutral condition.<b>Discussion</b>: Discussion focused on individual differences in emotion and social preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"92 5","pages":"1394-1409"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12896","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispositional compassion shifts social preferences in systematic ways\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Ocampo,&nbsp;Dacher Keltner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopy.12896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Introduction</b>: How people attach value to the outcomes of self and other—social preferences—is central to social behavior. Recently, how dispositional and state emotion shape such social preferences has received researchers' attention.<b>Method</b>: The present investigation asked whether and to what extent dispositional and state compassion predict shifts in social preferences across 4 samples: two correlational samples (final <i>n</i>s 153 &amp; 368, study 1a and 1b) and two experimental samples (final <i>n</i>s: 430 &amp; 530, studies 2 and 3).<b>Results</b>: In keeping with recent accounts of compassion, dispositional compassion predicted general preference for equality, expressed as dispreference for both monetary advantage over another (interaction <i>β</i>s = −0.36, −0.33, −0.25, −0.22; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and monetary disadvantage relative to others (<i>β</i>s: 0.26, 0.27, 0.28, 0.17; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; positive coefficients imply dispreference). This dispositional effect persisted when controlling for prosociality, positivity, agreeableness, and respectfulness. Furthermore, these dispositional compassion effects were relatively unchanged by experimental emotion inductions in studies 3 and 4. The experimental inductions of state compassion and state pride showed little evidence of systematic effects on social preferences relative to each other or a neutral condition.<b>Discussion</b>: Discussion focused on individual differences in emotion and social preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":\"92 5\",\"pages\":\"1394-1409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jopy.12896\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言人们如何重视自己和他人的结果--社会偏好--是社会行为的核心。最近,性格和状态情感如何影响这种社会偏好受到了研究人员的关注:本研究调查了四个样本:两个相关样本(最终 ns 分别为 153 和 368,研究 1a 和 1b)和两个实验样本(最终 ns 分别为 430 和 530,研究 2 和 3)中的倾向性和状态情感是否以及在多大程度上预测了社会偏好的变化:结果:与最近关于同情心的论述一致,性格上的同情心预示着对平等的普遍偏好,表现为对两种货币优势的偏好都高于另一种货币优势(交互作用 βs = -0.36、-0.33、-0.25、-0.22;所有 p 讨论:讨论的重点是情感和社会偏好的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dispositional compassion shifts social preferences in systematic ways

Introduction: How people attach value to the outcomes of self and other—social preferences—is central to social behavior. Recently, how dispositional and state emotion shape such social preferences has received researchers' attention.Method: The present investigation asked whether and to what extent dispositional and state compassion predict shifts in social preferences across 4 samples: two correlational samples (final ns 153 & 368, study 1a and 1b) and two experimental samples (final ns: 430 & 530, studies 2 and 3).Results: In keeping with recent accounts of compassion, dispositional compassion predicted general preference for equality, expressed as dispreference for both monetary advantage over another (interaction βs = −0.36, −0.33, −0.25, −0.22; all p < 0.001) and monetary disadvantage relative to others (βs: 0.26, 0.27, 0.28, 0.17; all p < 0.01; positive coefficients imply dispreference). This dispositional effect persisted when controlling for prosociality, positivity, agreeableness, and respectfulness. Furthermore, these dispositional compassion effects were relatively unchanged by experimental emotion inductions in studies 3 and 4. The experimental inductions of state compassion and state pride showed little evidence of systematic effects on social preferences relative to each other or a neutral condition.Discussion: Discussion focused on individual differences in emotion and social preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
The (Un)Attractiveness of Dark Triad Personalities: Assessing Fictitious Characters for Short- and Long-Term Relationships. Understanding Parenting Stress in Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Parents' Self-Criticism, Child Negative Emotionality, and Child Age at Placement. Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life Development of Self‐Reported Reward Responsiveness and Inhibitory Control and the Role of Clinical and Neural Predictors Negative Emotion (dys)regulation Predicts Distorted Time Perception: Preliminary Experimental Evidence and Implications for Psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1