共同夺回控制权的可行性研究--一项为癌症患儿父母提供支持的干预措施。

IF 1.6 3区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s10880-023-09998-6

Ariane Levesque, David Ogez, Vivianne Gravel, Valérie Marcil, Daniel Curnier, Émélie Rondeau, Daniel Sinnett, Katherine Péloquin, Serge Sultan

{"title":"共同夺回控制权的可行性研究--一项为癌症患儿父母提供支持的干预措施。","authors":"Ariane Levesque, David Ogez, Vivianne Gravel, Valérie Marcil, Daniel Curnier, Émélie Rondeau, Daniel Sinnett, Katherine Péloquin, Serge Sultan","doi":"10.1007/s10880-023-09998-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Parents of children with cancer can experience increased emotional distress. This study aimed to assess the feasibility (i.e., reach, treatment fidelity, and social validity) of Taking Back Control Together (TBCT).Methods: We assessed reach with the enrollment and dropout ratios. We assessed treatment fidelity using items from existing programs, controlling for the reliability of the items. For social validity, we used an adapted version of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory and compared means with theoretical cut-points.Results: 42 participants enrolled in the intervention. The enrollment and dropout ratios were 39% and 38%, respectively. Treatment fidelity was 77.3-84.3% (95%CI 75.3-86%). Acceptability (M = 90%), satisfaction (M = 87%), and relevance (M = 82%) were significantly positive.Conclusion: This study suggests that certain elements of TBCT need to be reassessed before the intervention is pilot tested. Although reach was likely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, it could be improved with some modifications to the intervention.","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":"444-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility Study of Taking Back Control Together, an Intervention to Support Parents of Children with Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ariane Levesque, David Ogez, Vivianne Gravel, Valérie Marcil, Daniel Curnier, Émélie Rondeau, Daniel Sinnett, Katherine Péloquin, Serge Sultan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10880-023-09998-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Parents of children with cancer can experience increased emotional distress. This study aimed to assess the feasibility (i.e., reach, treatment fidelity, and social validity) of Taking Back Control Together (TBCT).Methods: We assessed reach with the enrollment and dropout ratios. We assessed treatment fidelity using items from existing programs, controlling for the reliability of the items. For social validity, we used an adapted version of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory and compared means with theoretical cut-points.Results: 42 participants enrolled in the intervention. The enrollment and dropout ratios were 39% and 38%, respectively. Treatment fidelity was 77.3-84.3% (95%CI 75.3-86%). Acceptability (M = 90%), satisfaction (M = 87%), and relevance (M = 82%) were significantly positive.Conclusion: This study suggests that certain elements of TBCT need to be reassessed before the intervention is pilot tested. Although reach was likely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, it could be improved with some modifications to the intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"444-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-023-09998-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-023-09998-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

简介癌症患儿的父母可能会经历更多的情绪困扰。本研究旨在评估 "共同夺回控制权"（TBCT）的可行性（即覆盖范围、治疗忠实性和社会有效性）：方法：我们通过入学率和辍学率来评估覆盖率。我们使用现有项目中的项目来评估治疗的忠实性，并控制项目的可靠性。在社会有效性方面，我们使用了改编版的治疗评估量表，并将平均值与理论切点进行了比较：42名参与者参加了干预。入学率和辍学率分别为 39% 和 38%。治疗忠实度为 77.3-84.3%（95%CI 75.3-86%）。可接受性（M = 90%）、满意度（M = 87%）和相关性（M = 82%）均显著提高：这项研究表明，在对干预措施进行试点测试之前，需要对 TBCT 的某些要素进行重新评估。虽然覆盖率可能会受到 COVID-19 大流行的影响，但如果对干预措施进行一些修改，覆盖率还是可以提高的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Feasibility Study of Taking Back Control Together, an Intervention to Support Parents of Children with Cancer.

Introduction: Parents of children with cancer can experience increased emotional distress. This study aimed to assess the feasibility (i.e., reach, treatment fidelity, and social validity) of Taking Back Control Together (TBCT).

Methods: We assessed reach with the enrollment and dropout ratios. We assessed treatment fidelity using items from existing programs, controlling for the reliability of the items. For social validity, we used an adapted version of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory and compared means with theoretical cut-points.

Results: 42 participants enrolled in the intervention. The enrollment and dropout ratios were 39% and 38%, respectively. Treatment fidelity was 77.3-84.3% (95%CI 75.3-86%). Acceptability (M = 90%), satisfaction (M = 87%), and relevance (M = 82%) were significantly positive.

Conclusion: This study suggests that certain elements of TBCT need to be reassessed before the intervention is pilot tested. Although reach was likely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, it could be improved with some modifications to the intervention.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.