{"title":"将增强优化与有限元分析相结合,设计多重约束条件下的钢结构重量","authors":"Dinh‐Nhat Truong, Jui-Sheng Chou","doi":"10.3846/jcem.2023.20399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-world optimization problems are ubiquitous across scientific domains, and many engineering challenges can be reimagined as optimization problems with relative ease. Consequently, researchers have focused on developing optimizers to tackle these challenges. The Snake Optimizer (SO) is an effective tool for solving complex optimization problems, drawing inspiration from snake patterns. However, the original SO requires the specification of six specific parameters to operate efficiently. In response to this, enhanced snake optimizers, namely ESO1 and ESO2, were developed in this study. In contrast to the original SO, ESO1 and ESO2 rely on a single set of parameters determined through sensitivity analysis when solving mathematical functions. This streamlined approach simplifies the application of ESOs for users dealing with optimization problems. ESO1 employs a logistic map to initialize populations, while ESO2 further refines ESO1 by integrating a Lévy flight to simulate snake movements during food searches. These enhanced optimizers were compared against the standard SO and 12 other established optimization methods to assess their performance. ESO1 significantly outperforms other algorithms in 15, 16, 13, 15, 21, 16, 24, 16, 19, 18, 13, 15, and 22 out of 24 mathematical functions. Similarly, ESO2 outperforms them in 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 23, 24, 20, 19, 20, 17, 22, and 23 functions. Moreover, ESO1 and ESO2 were applied to solve complex structural optimization problems, where they outperformed existing methods. Notably, ESO2 generated solutions that were, on average, 1.16%, 0.70%, 2.34%, 3.68%, and 6.71% lighter than those produced by SO, and 0.79%, 0.54%, 1.28%, 1.70%, and 1.60% lighter than those of ESO1 for respective problems. This study pioneers the mathematical evaluation of ESOs and their integration with the finite element method for structural weight design optimization, establishing ESO2 as an effective tool for solving engineering problems.","PeriodicalId":15524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Management","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTEGRATING ENHANCED OPTIMIZATION WITH FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FOR DESIGNING STEEL STRUCTURE WEIGHT UNDER MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS\",\"authors\":\"Dinh‐Nhat Truong, Jui-Sheng Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/jcem.2023.20399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real-world optimization problems are ubiquitous across scientific domains, and many engineering challenges can be reimagined as optimization problems with relative ease. Consequently, researchers have focused on developing optimizers to tackle these challenges. The Snake Optimizer (SO) is an effective tool for solving complex optimization problems, drawing inspiration from snake patterns. However, the original SO requires the specification of six specific parameters to operate efficiently. In response to this, enhanced snake optimizers, namely ESO1 and ESO2, were developed in this study. In contrast to the original SO, ESO1 and ESO2 rely on a single set of parameters determined through sensitivity analysis when solving mathematical functions. This streamlined approach simplifies the application of ESOs for users dealing with optimization problems. ESO1 employs a logistic map to initialize populations, while ESO2 further refines ESO1 by integrating a Lévy flight to simulate snake movements during food searches. These enhanced optimizers were compared against the standard SO and 12 other established optimization methods to assess their performance. ESO1 significantly outperforms other algorithms in 15, 16, 13, 15, 21, 16, 24, 16, 19, 18, 13, 15, and 22 out of 24 mathematical functions. Similarly, ESO2 outperforms them in 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 23, 24, 20, 19, 20, 17, 22, and 23 functions. Moreover, ESO1 and ESO2 were applied to solve complex structural optimization problems, where they outperformed existing methods. Notably, ESO2 generated solutions that were, on average, 1.16%, 0.70%, 2.34%, 3.68%, and 6.71% lighter than those produced by SO, and 0.79%, 0.54%, 1.28%, 1.70%, and 1.60% lighter than those of ESO1 for respective problems. This study pioneers the mathematical evaluation of ESOs and their integration with the finite element method for structural weight design optimization, establishing ESO2 as an effective tool for solving engineering problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering and Management\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2023.20399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2023.20399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
INTEGRATING ENHANCED OPTIMIZATION WITH FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FOR DESIGNING STEEL STRUCTURE WEIGHT UNDER MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS
Real-world optimization problems are ubiquitous across scientific domains, and many engineering challenges can be reimagined as optimization problems with relative ease. Consequently, researchers have focused on developing optimizers to tackle these challenges. The Snake Optimizer (SO) is an effective tool for solving complex optimization problems, drawing inspiration from snake patterns. However, the original SO requires the specification of six specific parameters to operate efficiently. In response to this, enhanced snake optimizers, namely ESO1 and ESO2, were developed in this study. In contrast to the original SO, ESO1 and ESO2 rely on a single set of parameters determined through sensitivity analysis when solving mathematical functions. This streamlined approach simplifies the application of ESOs for users dealing with optimization problems. ESO1 employs a logistic map to initialize populations, while ESO2 further refines ESO1 by integrating a Lévy flight to simulate snake movements during food searches. These enhanced optimizers were compared against the standard SO and 12 other established optimization methods to assess their performance. ESO1 significantly outperforms other algorithms in 15, 16, 13, 15, 21, 16, 24, 16, 19, 18, 13, 15, and 22 out of 24 mathematical functions. Similarly, ESO2 outperforms them in 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 23, 24, 20, 19, 20, 17, 22, and 23 functions. Moreover, ESO1 and ESO2 were applied to solve complex structural optimization problems, where they outperformed existing methods. Notably, ESO2 generated solutions that were, on average, 1.16%, 0.70%, 2.34%, 3.68%, and 6.71% lighter than those produced by SO, and 0.79%, 0.54%, 1.28%, 1.70%, and 1.60% lighter than those of ESO1 for respective problems. This study pioneers the mathematical evaluation of ESOs and their integration with the finite element method for structural weight design optimization, establishing ESO2 as an effective tool for solving engineering problems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Civil Engineering and Management is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an international forum for the dissemination of the latest original research, achievements and developments. We publish for researchers, designers, users and manufacturers in the different fields of civil engineering and management.
The journal publishes original articles that present new information and reviews. Our objective is to provide essential information and new ideas to help improve civil engineering competency, efficiency and productivity in world markets.
The Journal of Civil Engineering and Management publishes articles in the following fields:
building materials and structures,
structural mechanics and physics,
geotechnical engineering,
road and bridge engineering,
urban engineering and economy,
constructions technology, economy and management,
information technologies in construction,
fire protection, thermoinsulation and renovation of buildings,
labour safety in construction.