拔牙后使用磷酸亚铁和无菌纱布包的比较

Mansoor Ahmed Rahoojo, Muhammad Shahzad, Munawar Ali Baloch, Faiza Hasan, Zahid Hussain Siyal, P. Salman, Salman Shams
{"title":"拔牙后使用磷酸亚铁和无菌纱布包的比较","authors":"Mansoor Ahmed Rahoojo, Muhammad Shahzad, Munawar Ali Baloch, Faiza Hasan, Zahid Hussain Siyal, P. Salman, Salman Shams","doi":"10.52206/jsmc.2023.13.4.830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exodontia is the process of removing a tooth from its socket within the alveolar bone. Pain, bleeding, and non-healing are common complications associated with exodontias.Objectives: To compare bleeding time, pain, and healing after dental extraction using Ferrum Phosphoricum (FP) and a sterile gauze pack (SGP).Material and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 236 patients selected through consecutive sampling. Medically healthy individuals aged 15 to 60 were included while unwilling participants, those with medical complications, substance abuse history, fractures, or pregnancy were excluded. Patient data, including age, gender, and intervention details, were documented. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: FP tablets and pressure pack. Hemostasis achievement time, healing, and pain were recorded for both groups. Chi-square and Student t-tests were employed for comparisons.Results: The SGP group had a longer bleeding time (6.09±1.41 min) than the FP group (2.37±0.95 min) (p<0.001). Abnormal bleeding was observed in 55.9% of the SGP group but not in the FP group (p<0.001). Regarding pain scores, on Day 3 and Day 7 post-operation, the FP group reported significantly lower pain scores than the SGP group (p<0.001). However, by Day 14, both groups had no reported pain (0.0±0.0). Moderate and severe pain were more prevalent in the SGP group than in the FP group on Day 3 and Day 7, with statistically significant differences (p<0.001). The healing score was significantly lower in the FP compared to the Gauze pack group on Day 3, 7, and 14 (p<0.001).Conclusion: Ferrum Phosphoricum is superior in controlling post-extraction bleeding, pain management, and wound healing compared to a sterile gauze pack.Keywords: Bleeding, Dental Extraction, Hemorrhage, Socket, Sterile.","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Ferrum Phosphoricum and Sterile Gauze Pack after Dental Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Mansoor Ahmed Rahoojo, Muhammad Shahzad, Munawar Ali Baloch, Faiza Hasan, Zahid Hussain Siyal, P. Salman, Salman Shams\",\"doi\":\"10.52206/jsmc.2023.13.4.830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Exodontia is the process of removing a tooth from its socket within the alveolar bone. Pain, bleeding, and non-healing are common complications associated with exodontias.Objectives: To compare bleeding time, pain, and healing after dental extraction using Ferrum Phosphoricum (FP) and a sterile gauze pack (SGP).Material and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 236 patients selected through consecutive sampling. Medically healthy individuals aged 15 to 60 were included while unwilling participants, those with medical complications, substance abuse history, fractures, or pregnancy were excluded. Patient data, including age, gender, and intervention details, were documented. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: FP tablets and pressure pack. Hemostasis achievement time, healing, and pain were recorded for both groups. Chi-square and Student t-tests were employed for comparisons.Results: The SGP group had a longer bleeding time (6.09±1.41 min) than the FP group (2.37±0.95 min) (p<0.001). Abnormal bleeding was observed in 55.9% of the SGP group but not in the FP group (p<0.001). Regarding pain scores, on Day 3 and Day 7 post-operation, the FP group reported significantly lower pain scores than the SGP group (p<0.001). However, by Day 14, both groups had no reported pain (0.0±0.0). Moderate and severe pain were more prevalent in the SGP group than in the FP group on Day 3 and Day 7, with statistically significant differences (p<0.001). The healing score was significantly lower in the FP compared to the Gauze pack group on Day 3, 7, and 14 (p<0.001).Conclusion: Ferrum Phosphoricum is superior in controlling post-extraction bleeding, pain management, and wound healing compared to a sterile gauze pack.Keywords: Bleeding, Dental Extraction, Hemorrhage, Socket, Sterile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2023.13.4.830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2023.13.4.830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拔牙是将牙齿从牙槽骨内的牙槽窝中拔出的过程。疼痛、出血和不愈合是与拔牙相关的常见并发症:比较使用磷铁剂(FP)和无菌纱布包(SGP)拔牙后的出血时间、疼痛和愈合情况:这项随机对照试验通过连续抽样选出 236 名患者。研究对象包括年龄在 15 至 60 岁之间、身体健康的人,但不包括不愿意参加试验的人、有医疗并发症的人、有药物滥用史的人、骨折或怀孕的人。患者的数据,包括年龄、性别和干预细节,都被记录在案。参与者被随机分为两组:FP 药片组和压力包组。记录两组的止血时间、愈合情况和疼痛情况。采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验进行比较:结果:SGP 组出血时间(6.09±1.41 分钟)长于 FP 组(2.37±0.95 分钟)(P<0.001)。55.9% 的 SGP 组患者出现异常出血,而 FP 组患者没有出现异常出血(p<0.001)。关于疼痛评分,在术后第 3 天和第 7 天,FP 组的疼痛评分明显低于 SGP 组(p<0.001)。然而,到了第 14 天,两组均无疼痛报告(0.0±0.0)。在第 3 天和第 7 天,SGP 组的中度和重度疼痛比 FP 组更普遍,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。第 3 天、第 7 天和第 14 天,FP 组的愈合评分明显低于纱布包组(P<0.001):结论:与无菌纱布包相比,磷酸亚铁能更好地控制拔牙后出血、止痛和伤口愈合:出血 拔牙 出血 牙槽无菌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between Ferrum Phosphoricum and Sterile Gauze Pack after Dental Extraction
Background: Exodontia is the process of removing a tooth from its socket within the alveolar bone. Pain, bleeding, and non-healing are common complications associated with exodontias.Objectives: To compare bleeding time, pain, and healing after dental extraction using Ferrum Phosphoricum (FP) and a sterile gauze pack (SGP).Material and Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 236 patients selected through consecutive sampling. Medically healthy individuals aged 15 to 60 were included while unwilling participants, those with medical complications, substance abuse history, fractures, or pregnancy were excluded. Patient data, including age, gender, and intervention details, were documented. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: FP tablets and pressure pack. Hemostasis achievement time, healing, and pain were recorded for both groups. Chi-square and Student t-tests were employed for comparisons.Results: The SGP group had a longer bleeding time (6.09±1.41 min) than the FP group (2.37±0.95 min) (p<0.001). Abnormal bleeding was observed in 55.9% of the SGP group but not in the FP group (p<0.001). Regarding pain scores, on Day 3 and Day 7 post-operation, the FP group reported significantly lower pain scores than the SGP group (p<0.001). However, by Day 14, both groups had no reported pain (0.0±0.0). Moderate and severe pain were more prevalent in the SGP group than in the FP group on Day 3 and Day 7, with statistically significant differences (p<0.001). The healing score was significantly lower in the FP compared to the Gauze pack group on Day 3, 7, and 14 (p<0.001).Conclusion: Ferrum Phosphoricum is superior in controlling post-extraction bleeding, pain management, and wound healing compared to a sterile gauze pack.Keywords: Bleeding, Dental Extraction, Hemorrhage, Socket, Sterile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality Control in Regional Blood Center QC Laboratory Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario Comparison of Color Matching Ability of Dental Students and Dental Graduates using Vita Tooth Guide 3-D Master Serum Zinc and Copper Levels in Children with Thalassemia Major The Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy in Reducing Intraocular Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1