年轻、移民脆弱性和时间性。欧洲四国因年龄和法律地位而加剧的不平等现象

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY European Journal of Migration and Law Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1163/15718166-12340161
Hilde Lidén
{"title":"年轻、移民脆弱性和时间性。欧洲四国因年龄和法律地位而加剧的不平等现象","authors":"Hilde Lidén","doi":"10.1163/15718166-12340161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article adopts an intersectional approach to examine migratory vulnerabilities. It draws from qualitative data gathered by the <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">VULNER</span> research teams in four countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Norway, exploring how age and legal status intersect and how this intersection influences other vulnerability factors. When examining the rationale and consequences of practices that employ young age as a criterion for additional protection and welfare provision in the four countries, a paradox becomes apparent: designating <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">UAM</span>s as minors provide them with safer recipient conditions, yet, it may not guarantee a comprehensive child-sensitive approach in the long run. Treating them as asylum seekers, however, could lead to a more thorough evaluation of their vulnerabilities and long-term protection needs. Managing this paradox creates ambivalence in both systems. Moreover, the timing of these procedures greatly influences outcomes. The analysis is a part of the EU <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">VULNER</span> project, investigating vulnerability within global protection regimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Migration and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young Age, Migratory Vulnerabilities and Temporality. Compounding Inequalities Raised by Age and Legal Status – in Four European Countries\",\"authors\":\"Hilde Lidén\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718166-12340161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article adopts an intersectional approach to examine migratory vulnerabilities. It draws from qualitative data gathered by the <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">VULNER</span> research teams in four countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Norway, exploring how age and legal status intersect and how this intersection influences other vulnerability factors. When examining the rationale and consequences of practices that employ young age as a criterion for additional protection and welfare provision in the four countries, a paradox becomes apparent: designating <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">UAM</span>s as minors provide them with safer recipient conditions, yet, it may not guarantee a comprehensive child-sensitive approach in the long run. Treating them as asylum seekers, however, could lead to a more thorough evaluation of their vulnerabilities and long-term protection needs. Managing this paradox creates ambivalence in both systems. Moreover, the timing of these procedures greatly influences outcomes. The analysis is a part of the EU <span style=\\\"font-variant: small-caps;\\\">VULNER</span> project, investigating vulnerability within global protection regimes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Migration and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Migration and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Migration and Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用交叉方法研究移民的脆弱性。文章借鉴了 VULNER 研究小组在四个国家收集的定性数据:比利时、德国、意大利和挪威的定性数据,探讨了年龄与合法身份之间的交集,以及这种交集如何影响其他脆弱性因素。在研究这四个国家将年龄作为提供额外保护和福利的标准的做法的理由和后果时,一个悖论变得显而易见:将未成人和未成年者指定为未成年人为他们提供了更安全的接收条件,但从长远来看,这可能并不能保证采取全面的儿童敏感方法。然而,将他们视为寻求庇护者,则可以更全面地评估他们的脆弱性和长期保护需求。处理这一矛盾在两个系统中都造成了矛盾。此外,这些程序的时间安排也会对结果产生很大影响。该分析是欧盟 VULNER 项目的一部分,旨在调查全球保护制度中的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Young Age, Migratory Vulnerabilities and Temporality. Compounding Inequalities Raised by Age and Legal Status – in Four European Countries

This article adopts an intersectional approach to examine migratory vulnerabilities. It draws from qualitative data gathered by the VULNER research teams in four countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Norway, exploring how age and legal status intersect and how this intersection influences other vulnerability factors. When examining the rationale and consequences of practices that employ young age as a criterion for additional protection and welfare provision in the four countries, a paradox becomes apparent: designating UAMs as minors provide them with safer recipient conditions, yet, it may not guarantee a comprehensive child-sensitive approach in the long run. Treating them as asylum seekers, however, could lead to a more thorough evaluation of their vulnerabilities and long-term protection needs. Managing this paradox creates ambivalence in both systems. Moreover, the timing of these procedures greatly influences outcomes. The analysis is a part of the EU VULNER project, investigating vulnerability within global protection regimes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Migration and Law is a quarterly journal on migration law and policy with specific emphasis on the European Union, the Council of Europe and migration activities within the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This journal differs from other migration journals by focusing on both the law and policy within the field of migration, as opposed to examining immigration and migration policies from a wholly sociological perspective. The Journal is the initiative of the Centre for Migration Law of the University of Nijmegen, in co-operation with the Brussels-based Migration Policy Group.
期刊最新文献
The ‘Border Security’ Concept in EU Law EU Boots on the Ground and Effective Judicial Protection against Frontex’s Operational Powers in Return: Lessons from Case T‑600/21 When Do Union Citizens and Their Families Have the Right to Equal Treatment on Grounds of Nationality in EU Law? The Fiction of Non-entry in European Migration Law: Its Implications on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Irregular Migrants at European Borders Derogations in Exchange of Increased Responsibility: How Can This Fix the Broken Promise for More Solidarity in the EU?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1