烧伤登记临床试验中性别、种族和民族代表性的横断面研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s40615-023-01897-8
Sara Sheikh-Oleslami, Brendan Tao, Bettina Papp, Shreya Luthra, Anthony Papp
{"title":"烧伤登记临床试验中性别、种族和民族代表性的横断面研究。","authors":"Sara Sheikh-Oleslami, Brendan Tao, Bettina Papp, Shreya Luthra, Anthony Papp","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01897-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The demographic proportions of plastic surgery trials approximating real-world disease have not well been studied. Judicious trial representation is essential in evaluation of treatments across diverse patient populations. Herein, we investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across burn trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in high-quality, with reduced risk of bias, randomized controlled trials (RCT) on burns registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the query \"burn.\" Completed RCTs reporting at least two demographic groups, employing double masking or greater, and with results accessible through the registry or publications were included. Trial characteristics (sponsor country, site location, initiation year, study phase, masking) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity per US reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based burn disease burdens. The primary outcome was the population-to-prevalence ratio of enrolled female participants. Secondary outcomes included representation of racial and ethnic populations as related to study blinding, phase, and study/sponsor locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 546 records, 39 trials met the inclusion criteria (2919 participants). All trials reported sex demographics, with females comprising 37.02% of all participants (PPR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.59, 0.82], likely indicating underrepresentation against their empiric disease burden). Only 7 and 9 trials reported ethnicity and race, respectively, although not comprehensively. Among trials reporting race or ethnicity, Caucasians and Black persons comprised 57.52% and 21.80% of participants, respectively, while only 9.80% had Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Severe underreporting of race and ethnicity precluded much of secondary significance testing across study variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females are likely underrepresented in high-quality, US-registered burn trials, unreflective of their real-world disease burden. Further, severe underreporting of race and ethnicity was noted. Future trials should enroll diverse demographics and equitable populations for promotion of study generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":"576-582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Sectional Study of Sex, Race, and Ethnic Representation in Burn Registered Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Sheikh-Oleslami, Brendan Tao, Bettina Papp, Shreya Luthra, Anthony Papp\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-023-01897-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The demographic proportions of plastic surgery trials approximating real-world disease have not well been studied. Judicious trial representation is essential in evaluation of treatments across diverse patient populations. Herein, we investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across burn trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in high-quality, with reduced risk of bias, randomized controlled trials (RCT) on burns registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the query \\\"burn.\\\" Completed RCTs reporting at least two demographic groups, employing double masking or greater, and with results accessible through the registry or publications were included. Trial characteristics (sponsor country, site location, initiation year, study phase, masking) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity per US reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based burn disease burdens. The primary outcome was the population-to-prevalence ratio of enrolled female participants. Secondary outcomes included representation of racial and ethnic populations as related to study blinding, phase, and study/sponsor locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 546 records, 39 trials met the inclusion criteria (2919 participants). All trials reported sex demographics, with females comprising 37.02% of all participants (PPR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.59, 0.82], likely indicating underrepresentation against their empiric disease burden). Only 7 and 9 trials reported ethnicity and race, respectively, although not comprehensively. Among trials reporting race or ethnicity, Caucasians and Black persons comprised 57.52% and 21.80% of participants, respectively, while only 9.80% had Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Severe underreporting of race and ethnicity precluded much of secondary significance testing across study variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Females are likely underrepresented in high-quality, US-registered burn trials, unreflective of their real-world disease burden. Further, severe underreporting of race and ethnicity was noted. Future trials should enroll diverse demographics and equitable populations for promotion of study generalizability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"576-582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01897-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01897-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:整形外科试验的人口比例与真实世界疾病的比例尚未得到很好的研究。合理的试验代表性对于评估不同患者群体的治疗方法至关重要。在此,我们调查了烧伤试验中患者入组的性别、种族和民族差异:方法:以 "烧伤 "为查询条件,对在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册的高质量、降低了偏倚风险的烧伤随机对照试验(RCT)的参与者进行横断面分析。纳入的已完成 RCT 至少报告了两个人口统计学组别,采用了双重或更多的掩蔽,且试验结果可通过注册表或出版物查阅。收集了试验特征(发起国、研究地点、启动年份、研究阶段、掩蔽)和人口统计学数据(根据美国报告指南,包括性别、种族、民族)。全球疾病负担数据库提供了基于性别的烧伤疾病负担。主要结果是入组女性参与者的人口流行率。次要结果包括与研究盲法、阶段和研究/赞助商地点相关的种族和民族人口代表性:在 546 条记录中,有 39 项试验符合纳入标准(2919 名参与者)。所有试验都报告了性别统计数据,其中女性占所有参与者的 37.02%(PPR = 0.71,95% CI [0.59,0.82],这可能表明女性在经验性疾病负担方面的代表性不足)。只有 7 项和 9 项试验分别报告了种族和人种情况,但并不全面。在报告种族或人种的试验中,白种人和黑人分别占 57.52% 和 21.80%,而西班牙/拉丁美洲人仅占 9.80%。种族和人种的严重低报排除了对研究变量进行二次显著性检验的可能性:结论:在美国注册的高质量烧伤试验中,女性的比例可能偏低,这不能反映女性在现实世界中的疾病负担。此外,种族和民族的报告严重不足。未来的试验应招募不同的人口和公平的人群,以提高研究的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Cross-Sectional Study of Sex, Race, and Ethnic Representation in Burn Registered Clinical Trials.

Purpose: The demographic proportions of plastic surgery trials approximating real-world disease have not well been studied. Judicious trial representation is essential in evaluation of treatments across diverse patient populations. Herein, we investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across burn trials.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in high-quality, with reduced risk of bias, randomized controlled trials (RCT) on burns registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the query "burn." Completed RCTs reporting at least two demographic groups, employing double masking or greater, and with results accessible through the registry or publications were included. Trial characteristics (sponsor country, site location, initiation year, study phase, masking) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity per US reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based burn disease burdens. The primary outcome was the population-to-prevalence ratio of enrolled female participants. Secondary outcomes included representation of racial and ethnic populations as related to study blinding, phase, and study/sponsor locations.

Results: Of 546 records, 39 trials met the inclusion criteria (2919 participants). All trials reported sex demographics, with females comprising 37.02% of all participants (PPR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.59, 0.82], likely indicating underrepresentation against their empiric disease burden). Only 7 and 9 trials reported ethnicity and race, respectively, although not comprehensively. Among trials reporting race or ethnicity, Caucasians and Black persons comprised 57.52% and 21.80% of participants, respectively, while only 9.80% had Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Severe underreporting of race and ethnicity precluded much of secondary significance testing across study variables.

Conclusions: Females are likely underrepresented in high-quality, US-registered burn trials, unreflective of their real-world disease burden. Further, severe underreporting of race and ethnicity was noted. Future trials should enroll diverse demographics and equitable populations for promotion of study generalizability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Implicit Racial Bias in Evaluation of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. Factors Associated with Self-reported COVID-19 Infection and Hospitalization among Patients Seeking Care at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. The Robust Relation of Microaggressions with Alcohol-Related Problems Among Black Individuals Who Use Alcohol: the Role of Drinking to Cope with Negative Affect. Vicarious Racism, Direct Racism, and Mental Health Among Racialized Minority Healthcare Workers. Cesarean Delivery Outcomes for Patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019 in the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1