按年龄组划分的二价强化疫苗对 COVID-19 感染的影响

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Resistance Updates Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.drup.2023.101039
Yoshiyasu Takefuji
{"title":"按年龄组划分的二价强化疫苗对 COVID-19 感染的影响","authors":"Yoshiyasu Takefuji","doi":"10.1016/j.drup.2023.101039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines time-series vaccine effectiveness on COVID-19 infection with/without a bivalent booster dose by 6 age groups such as 18–29, 30–49, 50–64, 65–79, 80+, and all_ages respectively. CDC’s COVID data on rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths by updated (bivalent) booster status was used in this study. This result concludes that there is no difference between vaccines with or without a bivalent booster dose for preventing COVID-19 infection in 6 age groups 18–29, 30–49, 50–64, 65–79, 80+, and all_ages. Vaccination is effective in two age groups of 65-79 and 80+ for preventing COVID-19 infection. However, vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection has not been confirmed in the 18–29 and 30–49 age groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51022,"journal":{"name":"Drug Resistance Updates","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101039"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccine effects on COVID-19 infection with bivalent boosting by age group\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiyasu Takefuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drup.2023.101039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines time-series vaccine effectiveness on COVID-19 infection with/without a bivalent booster dose by 6 age groups such as 18–29, 30–49, 50–64, 65–79, 80+, and all_ages respectively. CDC’s COVID data on rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths by updated (bivalent) booster status was used in this study. This result concludes that there is no difference between vaccines with or without a bivalent booster dose for preventing COVID-19 infection in 6 age groups 18–29, 30–49, 50–64, 65–79, 80+, and all_ages. Vaccination is effective in two age groups of 65-79 and 80+ for preventing COVID-19 infection. However, vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection has not been confirmed in the 18–29 and 30–49 age groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Resistance Updates\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Resistance Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136876462300122X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Resistance Updates","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136876462300122X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文按 18-29 岁、30-49 岁、50-64 岁、65-79 岁、80 岁以上和所有年龄等 6 个年龄组分别研究了接种/未接种二价加强剂的 COVID-19 感染疫苗的时间序列效果。本研究采用了美国疾病预防控制中心的 COVID 数据,即按最新(二价)强化剂情况分列的 COVID-19 病例率和死亡率。结果表明,在 18-29 岁、30-49 岁、50-64 岁、65-79 岁、80 岁以上和所有年龄段的 6 个年龄组中,接种或不接种二价强化剂疫苗在预防 COVID-19 感染方面没有差异。65-79 岁和 80 岁以上两个年龄组接种疫苗可有效预防 COVID-19 感染。但在 18-29 岁和 30-49 岁年龄组中,疫苗对预防 COVID-19 感染的有效性尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vaccine effects on COVID-19 infection with bivalent boosting by age group

This paper examines time-series vaccine effectiveness on COVID-19 infection with/without a bivalent booster dose by 6 age groups such as 18–29, 30–49, 50–64, 65–79, 80+, and all_ages respectively. CDC’s COVID data on rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths by updated (bivalent) booster status was used in this study. This result concludes that there is no difference between vaccines with or without a bivalent booster dose for preventing COVID-19 infection in 6 age groups 18–29, 30–49, 50–64, 65–79, 80+, and all_ages. Vaccination is effective in two age groups of 65-79 and 80+ for preventing COVID-19 infection. However, vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection has not been confirmed in the 18–29 and 30–49 age groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Resistance Updates
Drug Resistance Updates 医学-药学
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
11.90%
发文量
32
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Drug Resistance Updates serves as a platform for publishing original research, commentary, and expert reviews on significant advancements in drug resistance related to infectious diseases and cancer. It encompasses diverse disciplines such as molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, pharmacology, microbiology, preclinical therapeutics, oncology, and clinical medicine. The journal addresses both basic research and clinical aspects of drug resistance, providing insights into novel drugs and strategies to overcome resistance. Original research articles are welcomed, and review articles are authored by leaders in the field by invitation. Articles are written by leaders in the field, in response to an invitation from the Editors, and are peer-reviewed prior to publication. Articles are clear, readable, and up-to-date, suitable for a multidisciplinary readership and include schematic diagrams and other illustrations conveying the major points of the article. The goal is to highlight recent areas of growth and put them in perspective. *Expert reviews in clinical and basic drug resistance research in oncology and infectious disease *Describes emerging technologies and therapies, particularly those that overcome drug resistance *Emphasises common themes in microbial and cancer research
期刊最新文献
Modeling the epidemiologic impact of age-targeted vaccination for drug-resistant tuberculosis TMOD3 accelerated resistance to immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer through promoting autophagy-dependent degradation of ASCL4 Editorial Board Revolutionising infection control: building the next generation of phage banks Targeting NQO1 induces ferroptosis and triggers anti-tumor immunity in immunotherapy-resistant KEAP1-deficient cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1