Mehmet D. Sulu, Orhan Aydin, Ronald C. Martella, Emine Erden, Zafer Ozen
{"title":"基于应用行为分析的土耳其自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 干预措施的元分析","authors":"Mehmet D. Sulu, Orhan Aydin, Ronald C. Martella, Emine Erden, Zafer Ozen","doi":"10.1007/s40489-023-00421-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Interventions based on the principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA) have been determined to be evidenced-based practices and are widely used with individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) across the world. Originally developed in the USA, implementation of these interventions has become widespread in the last decade in Turkey. Given the significance of culture in guiding ABA practices, this meta-analysis investigated the prevalence and the magnitude effects of ABA-based interventions and whether specific participant and intervention characteristics moderated such effects in Turkey. Seventy-one ABA-based intervention studies were assessed based on What Works Clearinghouse (WWC, Kratochwill et al., <i>Remedial and Special Education</i>, 34(1), 26–38, 2013) design standards (DSs) including (a) systematic manipulation of independent variables, (b) interrater reliability, (c) three demonstrations of the intervention effect, and (d) adequate number of data points collected for each condition. Forty-three studies that met WWC (Kratochwill et al., <i>Remedial and Special Education</i>, 34(1), 26–38, 2013) DSs were analyzed and calculated with baseline-corrected tau (Tarlow, <i>Behavior Modification, 41</i>(4), 427–467, 2017). Furthermore, performance-criteria-based effect size values (PCES; Aydin and Tanious, <i>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis</i>, 2021) were calculated for 27 studies that had mastery criteria. While the overall tau appeared to be large 0.71 (<i>p</i> = 0.072, se = 0.254), the overall effect size for PCES revealed a small effect of 0.73. The comparisons of all sub-categories’ effect sizes of moderator variables were not statistically significant based on Kruskal Wallis or Mann Whitney U tests. Additionally, findings revealed that studies were predominantly implemented by highly trained researchers in segregated one-on-one settings, and did not include adults with ASD nor challenging behavior. Overall, there has been significant growth in ABA-based interventions in Turkey that show promise in improving the lives of individuals with ASD. However, further research and cultural considerations are essential for a comprehensive understanding of their impact in the Turkish context. Findings from two different effect size analyses and recommendations for future studies are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46647,"journal":{"name":"Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-Analysis of Applied Behavior Analysis-Based Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet D. Sulu, Orhan Aydin, Ronald C. Martella, Emine Erden, Zafer Ozen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40489-023-00421-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Interventions based on the principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA) have been determined to be evidenced-based practices and are widely used with individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) across the world. Originally developed in the USA, implementation of these interventions has become widespread in the last decade in Turkey. Given the significance of culture in guiding ABA practices, this meta-analysis investigated the prevalence and the magnitude effects of ABA-based interventions and whether specific participant and intervention characteristics moderated such effects in Turkey. Seventy-one ABA-based intervention studies were assessed based on What Works Clearinghouse (WWC, Kratochwill et al., <i>Remedial and Special Education</i>, 34(1), 26–38, 2013) design standards (DSs) including (a) systematic manipulation of independent variables, (b) interrater reliability, (c) three demonstrations of the intervention effect, and (d) adequate number of data points collected for each condition. Forty-three studies that met WWC (Kratochwill et al., <i>Remedial and Special Education</i>, 34(1), 26–38, 2013) DSs were analyzed and calculated with baseline-corrected tau (Tarlow, <i>Behavior Modification, 41</i>(4), 427–467, 2017). Furthermore, performance-criteria-based effect size values (PCES; Aydin and Tanious, <i>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis</i>, 2021) were calculated for 27 studies that had mastery criteria. While the overall tau appeared to be large 0.71 (<i>p</i> = 0.072, se = 0.254), the overall effect size for PCES revealed a small effect of 0.73. The comparisons of all sub-categories’ effect sizes of moderator variables were not statistically significant based on Kruskal Wallis or Mann Whitney U tests. Additionally, findings revealed that studies were predominantly implemented by highly trained researchers in segregated one-on-one settings, and did not include adults with ASD nor challenging behavior. Overall, there has been significant growth in ABA-based interventions in Turkey that show promise in improving the lives of individuals with ASD. However, further research and cultural considerations are essential for a comprehensive understanding of their impact in the Turkish context. Findings from two different effect size analyses and recommendations for future studies are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-023-00421-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-023-00421-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于应用行为分析(ABA)原则的干预措施已被确定为有实证依据的做法,并在全球自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者中广泛使用。这些干预措施最初是在美国开发的,近十年来在土耳其得到了广泛应用。鉴于文化在指导 ABA 实践中的重要意义,本荟萃分析调查了基于 ABA 的干预措施在土耳其的流行程度和效果大小,以及特定参与者和干预措施的特征是否会调节这些效果。71 项基于 ABA 的干预研究是根据 What Works Clearinghouse(WWC,Kratochwill 等人,Remedial and Special Education,34(1), 26-38, 2013)的设计标准(DSs)进行评估的,这些标准包括:(a)对独立变量的系统操作;(b)评定者之间的可靠性;(c)对干预效果的三次演示;以及(d)为每个条件收集足够数量的数据点。符合 WWC 标准的 43 项研究(Kratochwill 等人,《补习与特殊教育》,34(1),26-38,2013 年)对 DSs 进行了分析,并使用基线校正 tau 进行了计算(Tarlow,《行为矫正》,41(4),427-467,2017)。此外,还计算了 27 项具有掌握标准的研究的基于表现标准的效应大小值(PCES;Aydin 和 Tanious,《应用行为分析杂志》,2021 年)。虽然总体 tau 值为 0.71(p = 0.072,se = 0.254),但 PCES 的总体效应大小仅为 0.73。根据 Kruskal Wallis 或 Mann Whitney U 检验,所有子类别调节变量效应大小的比较在统计学上都不显著。此外,研究结果显示,这些研究主要是由训练有素的研究人员在一对一的隔离环境中实施的,并不包括患有 ASD 或有挑战行为的成年人。总体而言,土耳其以 ABA 为基础的干预措施有了显著发展,显示出改善 ASD 患者生活的希望。然而,要全面了解这些干预措施在土耳其的影响,进一步的研究和文化考虑是必不可少的。本文讨论了两种不同效应大小分析的结果以及对未来研究的建议。
A Meta-Analysis of Applied Behavior Analysis-Based Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in Turkey
Interventions based on the principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA) have been determined to be evidenced-based practices and are widely used with individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) across the world. Originally developed in the USA, implementation of these interventions has become widespread in the last decade in Turkey. Given the significance of culture in guiding ABA practices, this meta-analysis investigated the prevalence and the magnitude effects of ABA-based interventions and whether specific participant and intervention characteristics moderated such effects in Turkey. Seventy-one ABA-based intervention studies were assessed based on What Works Clearinghouse (WWC, Kratochwill et al., Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38, 2013) design standards (DSs) including (a) systematic manipulation of independent variables, (b) interrater reliability, (c) three demonstrations of the intervention effect, and (d) adequate number of data points collected for each condition. Forty-three studies that met WWC (Kratochwill et al., Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38, 2013) DSs were analyzed and calculated with baseline-corrected tau (Tarlow, Behavior Modification, 41(4), 427–467, 2017). Furthermore, performance-criteria-based effect size values (PCES; Aydin and Tanious, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2021) were calculated for 27 studies that had mastery criteria. While the overall tau appeared to be large 0.71 (p = 0.072, se = 0.254), the overall effect size for PCES revealed a small effect of 0.73. The comparisons of all sub-categories’ effect sizes of moderator variables were not statistically significant based on Kruskal Wallis or Mann Whitney U tests. Additionally, findings revealed that studies were predominantly implemented by highly trained researchers in segregated one-on-one settings, and did not include adults with ASD nor challenging behavior. Overall, there has been significant growth in ABA-based interventions in Turkey that show promise in improving the lives of individuals with ASD. However, further research and cultural considerations are essential for a comprehensive understanding of their impact in the Turkish context. Findings from two different effect size analyses and recommendations for future studies are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders publishes original articles that provide critical reviews of topics across the broad interdisciplinary research fields of autism spectrum disorders. Topics range from basic to applied and include but are not limited to genetics, neuroscience, diagnosis, applied behavior analysis, psychopharmacology, incidence, prevalence, etiology, differential diagnosis, treatment, measurement of treatment effects, education, perception and cognition. Topics across the life span are appropriate. In addition, given the high rates of comorbid conditions, the interface of sleep disorders, feeding problems, motor difficulties, ADHD, anxiety, depression and other disorders with autism spectrum disorders are appropriate. The Journal aims for an international audience as reflected in the editorial board.