可持续性认证:价值链转型中的多种自然价值并存,实现共同但有区别的责任

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101393
Beria Leimona , Dagmar Mithöfer , Gede Wibawa , Meine van Noordwijk
{"title":"可持续性认证:价值链转型中的多种自然价值并存,实现共同但有区别的责任","authors":"Beria Leimona ,&nbsp;Dagmar Mithöfer ,&nbsp;Gede Wibawa ,&nbsp;Meine van Noordwijk","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainability certification narratives are diverse contributing to multiperspective discourses on human–nature value systems. Certification shapes values at the human–nature interface, encompassing instrumental, relational, and intrinsic values. The sustainability certification debate involves four value systems: (1) economic, instrumental value; (2) social, relational value; (3) multiple values of human–nature interactions; and (4) global sustainability values for nature and commons. Despite rich narratives, questions on effectiveness and inclusiveness persist. The effectiveness of certification schemes relies on counterfactuals, and positive impacts occur when embracing inclusivity in supply chains. Accountability at the landscape level aligns with common-but-differentiated responsibility targets. This article reviews multidisciplinary literature on value-for-nature systems, highlighting narrative gaps in sustainability certification’s intended impacts, and providing policy recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101393"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001409/pdfft?md5=4f841bd159d13d81f428ede63e4500b4&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001409-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability certification: multiple values of nature coexist in value chain transformations toward a common but differentiated responsibility\",\"authors\":\"Beria Leimona ,&nbsp;Dagmar Mithöfer ,&nbsp;Gede Wibawa ,&nbsp;Meine van Noordwijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sustainability certification narratives are diverse contributing to multiperspective discourses on human–nature value systems. Certification shapes values at the human–nature interface, encompassing instrumental, relational, and intrinsic values. The sustainability certification debate involves four value systems: (1) economic, instrumental value; (2) social, relational value; (3) multiple values of human–nature interactions; and (4) global sustainability values for nature and commons. Despite rich narratives, questions on effectiveness and inclusiveness persist. The effectiveness of certification schemes relies on counterfactuals, and positive impacts occur when embracing inclusivity in supply chains. Accountability at the landscape level aligns with common-but-differentiated responsibility targets. This article reviews multidisciplinary literature on value-for-nature systems, highlighting narrative gaps in sustainability certification’s intended impacts, and providing policy recommendations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001409/pdfft?md5=4f841bd159d13d81f428ede63e4500b4&pid=1-s2.0-S1877343523001409-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001409\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523001409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续性认证的叙述多种多样,有助于对人类-自然价值体系进行多角度的讨论。认证塑造了人与自然界面的价值,包括工具价值、关系价值和内在价值。可持续性认证辩论涉及四个价值体系:(1) 经济、工具价值;(2) 社会、关系价值;(3) 人类与自然互动的多重价值;(4) 自然和公域的全球可持续性价值。尽管有丰富的叙述,但关于有效性和包容性的问题依然存在。认证计划的有效性依赖于反事实,在供应链中体现包容性会产生积极影响。景观层面的责任与共同但有区别的责任目标相一致。本文回顾了有关自然价值体系的多学科文献,强调了可持续发展认证在预期影响方面存在的不足,并提出了政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability certification: multiple values of nature coexist in value chain transformations toward a common but differentiated responsibility

Sustainability certification narratives are diverse contributing to multiperspective discourses on human–nature value systems. Certification shapes values at the human–nature interface, encompassing instrumental, relational, and intrinsic values. The sustainability certification debate involves four value systems: (1) economic, instrumental value; (2) social, relational value; (3) multiple values of human–nature interactions; and (4) global sustainability values for nature and commons. Despite rich narratives, questions on effectiveness and inclusiveness persist. The effectiveness of certification schemes relies on counterfactuals, and positive impacts occur when embracing inclusivity in supply chains. Accountability at the landscape level aligns with common-but-differentiated responsibility targets. This article reviews multidisciplinary literature on value-for-nature systems, highlighting narrative gaps in sustainability certification’s intended impacts, and providing policy recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
The potential of social innovation to shift the limits to climate adaptation Greening container terminals through optimization: a systematic review on recent advances Advancing sustainable port development in the Western Indian Ocean region Adaptation constraints, limits and enabling conditions in small island developing states Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1