利用基因组数据和电子健康记录的机器学习方法识别抗核抗体阳性患者的系统性红斑狼疮。

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Biodata Mining Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1186/s13040-023-00352-y
Chih-Wei Chung, Seng-Cho Chou, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Grace Joyce Zhang, Yu-Fang Chung, Yi-Ming Chen
{"title":"利用基因组数据和电子健康记录的机器学习方法识别抗核抗体阳性患者的系统性红斑狼疮。","authors":"Chih-Wei Chung, Seng-Cho Chou, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Grace Joyce Zhang, Yu-Fang Chung, Yi-Ming Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13040-023-00352-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has required at least a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer (≥ 1:80), it remains challenging for clinicians to identify patients with SLE. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) approach to assist in the detection of SLE patients using genomic data and electronic health records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with a positive ANA (≥ 1:80) were enrolled from the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative cohort. The Taiwan Biobank version 2 array was used to detect single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Six ML models, Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gradient Tree Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were used to identify SLE patients. The importance of the clinical and genetic features was determined by Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. A logistic regression model was applied to identify genetic variations associated with SLE in the subset of patients with an ANA equal to or exceeding 1:640.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 946 SLE and 1,892 non-SLE controls were included in this analysis. Among the six ML models, RF and XGB demonstrated superior performance in the differentiation of SLE from non-SLE. The leading features in the SHAP diagram were anti-double strand DNA antibodies, ANA titers, AC4 ANA pattern, polygenic risk scores, complement levels, and SNPs. Additionally, in the subgroup with a high ANA titer (≥ 1:640), six SNPs positively associated with SLE and five SNPs negatively correlated with SLE were discovered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML approaches offer the potential to assist in diagnosing SLE and uncovering novel SNPs in a group of patients with autoimmunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48947,"journal":{"name":"Biodata Mining","volume":"17 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning approaches to identify systemic lupus erythematosus in anti-nuclear antibody-positive patients using genomic data and electronic health records.\",\"authors\":\"Chih-Wei Chung, Seng-Cho Chou, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Grace Joyce Zhang, Yu-Fang Chung, Yi-Ming Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13040-023-00352-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has required at least a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer (≥ 1:80), it remains challenging for clinicians to identify patients with SLE. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) approach to assist in the detection of SLE patients using genomic data and electronic health records.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with a positive ANA (≥ 1:80) were enrolled from the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative cohort. The Taiwan Biobank version 2 array was used to detect single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Six ML models, Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gradient Tree Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were used to identify SLE patients. The importance of the clinical and genetic features was determined by Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. A logistic regression model was applied to identify genetic variations associated with SLE in the subset of patients with an ANA equal to or exceeding 1:640.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 946 SLE and 1,892 non-SLE controls were included in this analysis. Among the six ML models, RF and XGB demonstrated superior performance in the differentiation of SLE from non-SLE. The leading features in the SHAP diagram were anti-double strand DNA antibodies, ANA titers, AC4 ANA pattern, polygenic risk scores, complement levels, and SNPs. Additionally, in the subgroup with a high ANA titer (≥ 1:640), six SNPs positively associated with SLE and five SNPs negatively correlated with SLE were discovered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML approaches offer the potential to assist in diagnosing SLE and uncovering novel SNPs in a group of patients with autoimmunity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodata Mining\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodata Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00352-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodata Mining","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00352-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管2019年EULAR/ACR系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准要求抗核抗体(ANA)滴度至少为阳性(≥1:80),但临床医生识别SLE患者仍面临挑战。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习(ML)方法,利用基因组数据和电子健康记录协助检测系统性红斑狼疮患者:方法:从台湾精准医疗计划队列中选取ANA阳性(≥ 1:80)的参与者。使用台湾生物库第二版阵列检测单核苷酸多态性(SNP)数据。研究人员使用逻辑回归、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机、轻梯度提升机、梯度树提升和极端梯度提升(XGB)等六种多重L模型来识别系统性红斑狼疮患者。临床和遗传特征的重要性由夏普利加性解释(SHAP)值决定。在 ANA 等于或超过 1:640 的患者子集中,采用逻辑回归模型确定与系统性红斑狼疮相关的遗传变异:结果:共有 946 名系统性红斑狼疮患者和 1,892 名非系统性红斑狼疮对照患者参与了此次分析。在六个 ML 模型中,RF 和 XGB 在区分系统性红斑狼疮和非系统性红斑狼疮方面表现优异。SHAP图中的主要特征是抗双链DNA抗体、ANA滴度、AC4 ANA模式、多基因风险评分、补体水平和SNPs。此外,在 ANA 滴度较高(≥ 1:640)的亚组中,发现了 6 个与系统性红斑狼疮正相关的 SNPs 和 5 个与系统性红斑狼疮负相关的 SNPs:ML方法有可能帮助诊断系统性红斑狼疮,并在一组自身免疫患者中发现新的SNPs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning approaches to identify systemic lupus erythematosus in anti-nuclear antibody-positive patients using genomic data and electronic health records.

Background: Although the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has required at least a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer (≥ 1:80), it remains challenging for clinicians to identify patients with SLE. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) approach to assist in the detection of SLE patients using genomic data and electronic health records.

Methods: Participants with a positive ANA (≥ 1:80) were enrolled from the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative cohort. The Taiwan Biobank version 2 array was used to detect single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Six ML models, Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gradient Tree Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were used to identify SLE patients. The importance of the clinical and genetic features was determined by Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. A logistic regression model was applied to identify genetic variations associated with SLE in the subset of patients with an ANA equal to or exceeding 1:640.

Results: A total of 946 SLE and 1,892 non-SLE controls were included in this analysis. Among the six ML models, RF and XGB demonstrated superior performance in the differentiation of SLE from non-SLE. The leading features in the SHAP diagram were anti-double strand DNA antibodies, ANA titers, AC4 ANA pattern, polygenic risk scores, complement levels, and SNPs. Additionally, in the subgroup with a high ANA titer (≥ 1:640), six SNPs positively associated with SLE and five SNPs negatively correlated with SLE were discovered.

Conclusions: ML approaches offer the potential to assist in diagnosing SLE and uncovering novel SNPs in a group of patients with autoimmunity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biodata Mining
Biodata Mining MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: BioData Mining is an open access, open peer-reviewed journal encompassing research on all aspects of data mining applied to high-dimensional biological and biomedical data, focusing on computational aspects of knowledge discovery from large-scale genetic, transcriptomic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: -Development, evaluation, and application of novel data mining and machine learning algorithms. -Adaptation, evaluation, and application of traditional data mining and machine learning algorithms. -Open-source software for the application of data mining and machine learning algorithms. -Design, development and integration of databases, software and web services for the storage, management, retrieval, and analysis of data from large scale studies. -Pre-processing, post-processing, modeling, and interpretation of data mining and machine learning results for biological interpretation and knowledge discovery.
期刊最新文献
Transcriptome-based network analysis related to regulatory T cells infiltration identified RCN1 as a potential biomarker for prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Deciphering the tissue-specific functional effect of Alzheimer risk SNPs with deep genome annotation. Investigating potential drug targets for IgA nephropathy and membranous nephropathy through multi-queue plasma protein analysis: a Mendelian randomization study based on SMR and co-localization analysis. Deep joint learning diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on multimodal feature fusion. Modeling heterogeneity of Sudanese hospital stay in neonatal and maternal unit: non-parametric random effect models with Gamma distribution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1