{"title":"经济政策的专家知识：独臂经济学家 \"是否该退休了？","authors":"A. Shastitko, A. Zyubina","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors evaluate prospects of a new quality of relations between the holders of economic expertise based on scientific research, attention to essential (including interdisciplinary) details and its beneficiaries in the field of political decision-making. We substantiate the necessity of finding a compromise between what is interesting to a researcher and what is relevant for the development and application of economic policy measures in the light of the opposition of functionalist and fundamentalist approaches to the formation of interdisciplinary and sociopolitical discourses.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Knowledge for Economic Policy: Is It Time for the “One-armed Economist” to Retire?\",\"authors\":\"A. Shastitko, A. Zyubina\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors evaluate prospects of a new quality of relations between the holders of economic expertise based on scientific research, attention to essential (including interdisciplinary) details and its beneficiaries in the field of political decision-making. We substantiate the necessity of finding a compromise between what is interesting to a researcher and what is relevant for the development and application of economic policy measures in the light of the opposition of functionalist and fundamentalist approaches to the formation of interdisciplinary and sociopolitical discourses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Management: Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expert Knowledge for Economic Policy: Is It Time for the “One-armed Economist” to Retire?
The authors evaluate prospects of a new quality of relations between the holders of economic expertise based on scientific research, attention to essential (including interdisciplinary) details and its beneficiaries in the field of political decision-making. We substantiate the necessity of finding a compromise between what is interesting to a researcher and what is relevant for the development and application of economic policy measures in the light of the opposition of functionalist and fundamentalist approaches to the formation of interdisciplinary and sociopolitical discourses.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
