伟大卫国战争最后阶段(1944-1945 年)中欧和东欧国家冶金设备的赔款收回情况

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nauchnyi Dialog Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-344-359
V. V. Zapariy, V. V. Zapariy, N. N. Melnikov
{"title":"伟大卫国战争最后阶段(1944-1945 年)中欧和东欧国家冶金设备的赔款收回情况","authors":"V. V. Zapariy, V. V. Zapariy, N. N. Melnikov","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-344-359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to the lesser-known aspects of Soviet policy regarding the compulsory seizure of industrial equipment in territories liberated by the Red Army from the fascist bloc states in 1944—1945. Based on an analysis of decrees by the State Defense Committee, the principles of interaction between representatives of industrial People’s Commissariats and military authorities in liberated territories are revealed, with the aim of dismantling and transporting the most promising industrial assets back to the USSR for the needs of restoring the country’s metallurgical complex. The paper provides examples of property disputes among leading economic entities — the industrial People's Commissariats of the USSR — over the right to dismantle industrial facilities for their own benefit. It also sheds light on the activities of Special Assembly Managements under the People’s Commissariat for Construction of the USSR and their authority in the process of seizing industrial assets in territories freed from German control in Eastern Europe. Using the case studies of non-ferrous and ferrous metallurgy enterprises located in territories of fascist bloc countries (Germany, Hungary) liberated by the Red Army, typical approaches to organizing the compulsory dismantling of their equipment are analyzed. The research conducted vividly demonstrates the significance of reparations seizures of industrial equipment in Eastern Europe for the modernization and recovery of the USSR’s metallurgical complex during 1944—1945.","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reparations Withdrawals Of Metallurgical Equipment in Central and Eastern European Countries at Final Stage of Great Patriotic War (1944—1945)\",\"authors\":\"V. V. Zapariy, V. V. Zapariy, N. N. Melnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-344-359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is dedicated to the lesser-known aspects of Soviet policy regarding the compulsory seizure of industrial equipment in territories liberated by the Red Army from the fascist bloc states in 1944—1945. Based on an analysis of decrees by the State Defense Committee, the principles of interaction between representatives of industrial People’s Commissariats and military authorities in liberated territories are revealed, with the aim of dismantling and transporting the most promising industrial assets back to the USSR for the needs of restoring the country’s metallurgical complex. The paper provides examples of property disputes among leading economic entities — the industrial People's Commissariats of the USSR — over the right to dismantle industrial facilities for their own benefit. It also sheds light on the activities of Special Assembly Managements under the People’s Commissariat for Construction of the USSR and their authority in the process of seizing industrial assets in territories freed from German control in Eastern Europe. Using the case studies of non-ferrous and ferrous metallurgy enterprises located in territories of fascist bloc countries (Germany, Hungary) liberated by the Red Army, typical approaches to organizing the compulsory dismantling of their equipment are analyzed. The research conducted vividly demonstrates the significance of reparations seizures of industrial equipment in Eastern Europe for the modernization and recovery of the USSR’s metallurgical complex during 1944—1945.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nauchnyi Dialog\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nauchnyi Dialog\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-344-359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-344-359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文专门论述了 1944-1945 年红军从法西斯集团国家解放的领土上强制没收工业设备的苏联政策中鲜为人知的方面。根据对国家国防委员会法令的分析,揭示了工业人民委员会代表与解放区军事当局之间的互动原则,其目的是拆除最有前途的工业资产并将其运回苏联,以满足恢复国家冶金综合体的需要。本文举例说明了主要经济实体--苏联工业人民委员会--之间为自身利益拆除工业设施的权利而产生的财产纠纷。本文还揭示了苏联建设人民委员会下属的特别大会管理机构的活动及其在东欧摆脱德国控制的领土上夺取工业资产过程中的权力。通过对位于被红军解放的法西斯集团国家(德国、匈牙利)境内的有色金属和黑色冶金企业的案例研究,分析了组织强制拆除其设备的典型方法。所进行的研究生动地证明了 1944-1945 年间东欧工业设备的赔款没收对于苏联冶金综合体的现代化和恢复的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reparations Withdrawals Of Metallurgical Equipment in Central and Eastern European Countries at Final Stage of Great Patriotic War (1944—1945)
This article is dedicated to the lesser-known aspects of Soviet policy regarding the compulsory seizure of industrial equipment in territories liberated by the Red Army from the fascist bloc states in 1944—1945. Based on an analysis of decrees by the State Defense Committee, the principles of interaction between representatives of industrial People’s Commissariats and military authorities in liberated territories are revealed, with the aim of dismantling and transporting the most promising industrial assets back to the USSR for the needs of restoring the country’s metallurgical complex. The paper provides examples of property disputes among leading economic entities — the industrial People's Commissariats of the USSR — over the right to dismantle industrial facilities for their own benefit. It also sheds light on the activities of Special Assembly Managements under the People’s Commissariat for Construction of the USSR and their authority in the process of seizing industrial assets in territories freed from German control in Eastern Europe. Using the case studies of non-ferrous and ferrous metallurgy enterprises located in territories of fascist bloc countries (Germany, Hungary) liberated by the Red Army, typical approaches to organizing the compulsory dismantling of their equipment are analyzed. The research conducted vividly demonstrates the significance of reparations seizures of industrial equipment in Eastern Europe for the modernization and recovery of the USSR’s metallurgical complex during 1944—1945.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
期刊最新文献
Development of Gold Mining Industry in Yakutia in 1920s Relations between Siberian and Kazakh Khanates in 15th-16th Centuries Features of Sheriff Court in Scotland in Early 19th Century (Exemplified by Selkirkshire County) Legal Historians of Russian Diaspora in 1920s—1930s Iran in South Caucasus: Foreign Policy Strategy and Regional Relations with Russia (1991—2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1