欧盟法律中的全球价值链

Anna Beckers
{"title":"欧盟法律中的全球价值链","authors":"Anna Beckers","doi":"10.1093/yel/yead010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a burgeoning legal literature about the legal underpinnings of global value chains (GVCs). This article contributes to this literature through the lens of European Union (EU) law and proposes a different conceptual way to read GVCs legally. To that end, the contribution proposes understanding the evolving EU law on GVCs as a process of institutionalization leading to at least three legal forms. In EU company law, GVCs manifest actor-centrically as corporate obligations to govern the value chain. This mostly happens in the policies related to sustainability, but also features in some digitalization policies. In EU consumer law, the value chain appears as a collective network of actors that also bears collective responsibility towards the consumer for the production process. Moreover, in EU market practices and trade law, the value chain is approached in a de-personified manner by, on the one hand, targeting products relating to the territory (import/internal market access) and, on the other hand, trading practices in relations characterised by power asymmetry. These findings suggests that, rather than identifying a uniform legal concept of GVCs in EU law, a fragmented picture emerges in which different sub-areas of EU law develop different, partly even opposing, legal understandings of GVCs.","PeriodicalId":506840,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of European Law","volume":"220 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global value chains in EU law\",\"authors\":\"Anna Beckers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/yel/yead010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a burgeoning legal literature about the legal underpinnings of global value chains (GVCs). This article contributes to this literature through the lens of European Union (EU) law and proposes a different conceptual way to read GVCs legally. To that end, the contribution proposes understanding the evolving EU law on GVCs as a process of institutionalization leading to at least three legal forms. In EU company law, GVCs manifest actor-centrically as corporate obligations to govern the value chain. This mostly happens in the policies related to sustainability, but also features in some digitalization policies. In EU consumer law, the value chain appears as a collective network of actors that also bears collective responsibility towards the consumer for the production process. Moreover, in EU market practices and trade law, the value chain is approached in a de-personified manner by, on the one hand, targeting products relating to the territory (import/internal market access) and, on the other hand, trading practices in relations characterised by power asymmetry. These findings suggests that, rather than identifying a uniform legal concept of GVCs in EU law, a fragmented picture emerges in which different sub-areas of EU law develop different, partly even opposing, legal understandings of GVCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of European Law\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of European Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of European Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yead010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于全球价值链(GVCs)法律基础的法律文献层出不穷。本文从欧洲联盟(欧盟)法律的视角出发,提出了从法律角度解读全球价值链的不同概念方法,为这一文献做出了贡献。为此,本文建议将不断演变的欧盟全球价值链法律理解为一个制度化过程,至少会产生三种法律形式。在欧盟公司法中,全球价值链以行为者为中心,表现为企业有义务管理价值链。这主要体现在与可持续发展相关的政策中,但也体现在一些数字化政策中。在欧盟消费者法中,价值链是一个由行为者组成的集体网络,在生产过程中也对消费者承担集体责任。此外,在欧盟市场惯例和贸易法中,价值链是以非人格化的方式处理的,一方面针对与领土有关的产品(进口/内部市场准入),另一方面针对以权力不对称为特征的关系中的贸易惯例。这些研究结果表明,欧盟法律中并没有统一的全球价值链法律概念,而是出现了一种支离破碎的局面,即欧盟法律的不同子领域对全球价值链形成了不同的、部分甚至是对立的法律理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global value chains in EU law
There is a burgeoning legal literature about the legal underpinnings of global value chains (GVCs). This article contributes to this literature through the lens of European Union (EU) law and proposes a different conceptual way to read GVCs legally. To that end, the contribution proposes understanding the evolving EU law on GVCs as a process of institutionalization leading to at least three legal forms. In EU company law, GVCs manifest actor-centrically as corporate obligations to govern the value chain. This mostly happens in the policies related to sustainability, but also features in some digitalization policies. In EU consumer law, the value chain appears as a collective network of actors that also bears collective responsibility towards the consumer for the production process. Moreover, in EU market practices and trade law, the value chain is approached in a de-personified manner by, on the one hand, targeting products relating to the territory (import/internal market access) and, on the other hand, trading practices in relations characterised by power asymmetry. These findings suggests that, rather than identifying a uniform legal concept of GVCs in EU law, a fragmented picture emerges in which different sub-areas of EU law develop different, partly even opposing, legal understandings of GVCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EU resilience in investment protection: a case for revisiting and reinforcing the loyalty principle in EU external relations NextGenerationEU: Hamiltonian moment or European New Deal? Introducing the legislative priority rule: a constitutional compass for the Court Global value chains in EU law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1