高中学生成绩差:教师的信念

X.A. Tursunbayeva, Sh.O. Tazabek, A. Chsherbakov
{"title":"高中学生成绩差:教师的信念","authors":"X.A. Tursunbayeva, Sh.O. Tazabek, A. Chsherbakov","doi":"10.17759/pse.2023280505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of a study that explores the teachers’ beliefs concerning low-performing senior schoolchildren in one of the regions of Kazakhstan. Until recently, the issue of low-achieving students was largely absent from the agenda of secondary education and has not got attention from Kazakhstani researchers. A case study methodology was applied as the principal research method, facilitating an in-depth examination of teachers’ belief systems concerning low-performing students. 22 high school and first-year college teachers participated in a qualitative study in May and June 2022. We analyzed teachers’ ideas about low-achieving students within an ecological framework using an inductive thematic analysis of individual interviews and focus group discussions. We identidied the categories of teachers’ individual, in-school and systemic beliefs. These beliefs collectively contribute to the conceptualisation of a low-performing students, their educational trajectories, and their potential for success or failure in life.","PeriodicalId":507500,"journal":{"name":"Психологическая наука и образование","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Senior School Students’ Low Performance: Teachers’ Beliefs\",\"authors\":\"X.A. Tursunbayeva, Sh.O. Tazabek, A. Chsherbakov\",\"doi\":\"10.17759/pse.2023280505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the results of a study that explores the teachers’ beliefs concerning low-performing senior schoolchildren in one of the regions of Kazakhstan. Until recently, the issue of low-achieving students was largely absent from the agenda of secondary education and has not got attention from Kazakhstani researchers. A case study methodology was applied as the principal research method, facilitating an in-depth examination of teachers’ belief systems concerning low-performing students. 22 high school and first-year college teachers participated in a qualitative study in May and June 2022. We analyzed teachers’ ideas about low-achieving students within an ecological framework using an inductive thematic analysis of individual interviews and focus group discussions. We identidied the categories of teachers’ individual, in-school and systemic beliefs. These beliefs collectively contribute to the conceptualisation of a low-performing students, their educational trajectories, and their potential for success or failure in life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Психологическая наука и образование\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Психологическая наука и образование\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Психологическая наука и образование","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2023280505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究探讨了哈萨克斯坦某地区教师对成绩差的高年级学生的看法。直到最近,成绩差的学生问题在中等教育的议程中基本没有出现,也没有得到哈萨克斯坦研究人员的关注。本研究采用案例研究法作为主要研究方法,有助于深入研究教师对成绩差学生的看法。22 名高中和大学一年级教师参加了 2022 年 5 月和 6 月的定性研究。我们采用归纳式主题分析法,对个别访谈和焦点小组讨论进行分析,在生态框架内分析了教师对成绩差学生的看法。我们确定了教师个人信念、校内信念和系统信念的类别。这些信念共同促成了对成绩差学生的概念化、他们的教育轨迹以及他们在生活中成功或失败的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Senior School Students’ Low Performance: Teachers’ Beliefs
The article presents the results of a study that explores the teachers’ beliefs concerning low-performing senior schoolchildren in one of the regions of Kazakhstan. Until recently, the issue of low-achieving students was largely absent from the agenda of secondary education and has not got attention from Kazakhstani researchers. A case study methodology was applied as the principal research method, facilitating an in-depth examination of teachers’ belief systems concerning low-performing students. 22 high school and first-year college teachers participated in a qualitative study in May and June 2022. We analyzed teachers’ ideas about low-achieving students within an ecological framework using an inductive thematic analysis of individual interviews and focus group discussions. We identidied the categories of teachers’ individual, in-school and systemic beliefs. These beliefs collectively contribute to the conceptualisation of a low-performing students, their educational trajectories, and their potential for success or failure in life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Big Five Personality Traits as a moderator of the Relationship between Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety and Creative Personality The Specifics of Higher Mental Functions in Children with a Leading Left Hand The Relationship of the Attitude to Cheating with Social Beliefs and the Supposed Attitude of Others in High School Students Methodological Foundations for the Formation of Universal Educational Actions in the Context of the Ideas of the V.S. Mukhina’s Concept “Phenomenology of Personality Development and Being” Exploring the Role of Self-Efficacy in Station Rotation: Enhancing Critical Thinking and Literacy Skills Among Primary Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1