使用耳罩对白噪环境中失真产物声发射信噪比的影响

Seung-Deok Heo
{"title":"使用耳罩对白噪环境中失真产物声发射信噪比的影响","authors":"Seung-Deok Heo","doi":"10.31321/kmts.2023.15.2.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Earmuff has been shown to attenuate noise and may be useful in boothless audiometry. This study aimed to determine the effect of earmuff use on the signal-to-noise ratio of distortion production otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) in a white noise environment. Method: Participants were 19 young, healthy men and women (38 ears) aged 22.45±1.31 years. The hearing threshold level in 1, 2, 3, and 4 ㎑ did not exceed 15 ㏈ HL. DPOAE was performed at four points per octave in the range 842 to 9,509 ㎐ based on f2. After obtaining the baseline (Base), white noise was presented at 10 ㏈ intervals from 40 to 70 ㏈ SPL. DPOAE was obtained without (WN) and with earmuff (Earmuff). The maximum permissible ambient noise level (MPANL) of the WN and Earmuff were compared (paired t-test). Signal-to-noise ratio (one-way repeated measures ANOVA) and PASS rate (Chi-square test) between WN, Earmuff and Base at the overall frequency, mid-frequency (mid-3-freq), and high-frequency (hi-3-freq) bands were analyzed. Results: There was a difference of 22.19 ㏈ in MPANL between Base and WN (p=.000). There was a significant difference in the SNR between Base and WN from 40 ㏈ SPL, and in PASS rate between Base and Earmuff from 60 SPL (p<.005). Conclusion: In DPOAE, earmuff increase MPANL, which enables recording at up to 60 ㏈ SPL. The SNR in the high-frequency band is more preserved than in the lower, Therefore, it seems advantageous for early detection of cochlear microstructural changes due to noise or aging.","PeriodicalId":342499,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Society of Medicine &amp; Therapy Science","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Earmuff Using on Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Distortion Product OtoAcoustic Emission in White Noise Environments\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Deok Heo\",\"doi\":\"10.31321/kmts.2023.15.2.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Earmuff has been shown to attenuate noise and may be useful in boothless audiometry. This study aimed to determine the effect of earmuff use on the signal-to-noise ratio of distortion production otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) in a white noise environment. Method: Participants were 19 young, healthy men and women (38 ears) aged 22.45±1.31 years. The hearing threshold level in 1, 2, 3, and 4 ㎑ did not exceed 15 ㏈ HL. DPOAE was performed at four points per octave in the range 842 to 9,509 ㎐ based on f2. After obtaining the baseline (Base), white noise was presented at 10 ㏈ intervals from 40 to 70 ㏈ SPL. DPOAE was obtained without (WN) and with earmuff (Earmuff). The maximum permissible ambient noise level (MPANL) of the WN and Earmuff were compared (paired t-test). Signal-to-noise ratio (one-way repeated measures ANOVA) and PASS rate (Chi-square test) between WN, Earmuff and Base at the overall frequency, mid-frequency (mid-3-freq), and high-frequency (hi-3-freq) bands were analyzed. Results: There was a difference of 22.19 ㏈ in MPANL between Base and WN (p=.000). There was a significant difference in the SNR between Base and WN from 40 ㏈ SPL, and in PASS rate between Base and Earmuff from 60 SPL (p<.005). Conclusion: In DPOAE, earmuff increase MPANL, which enables recording at up to 60 ㏈ SPL. The SNR in the high-frequency band is more preserved than in the lower, Therefore, it seems advantageous for early detection of cochlear microstructural changes due to noise or aging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Society of Medicine &amp; Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Society of Medicine &amp; Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31321/kmts.2023.15.2.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Society of Medicine &amp; Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31321/kmts.2023.15.2.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:耳罩具有减弱噪声的作用,可用于无岗亭测听。本研究旨在确定在白噪声环境中使用耳罩对失真的耳声发射(DPOAE)信噪比的影响。 研究方法:参与者为 19 名年轻健康的男性和女性(38 耳),年龄为 22.45±1.31 岁。1、2、3 和 4 ㎑ 的听阈水平不超过 15 ㏈ HL。在获得基线(Base)后,以 10 ㏈ 的间隔从 40 ㏈ SPL 到 70 ㏈ SPL 播放白噪声。在不戴耳罩(WN)和戴耳罩(Earmuff)的情况下获得 DPOAE。比较了 WN 和 Earmuff 的最大允许环境噪音水平 (MPANL)(配对 t 检验)。分析了 WN、Earmuff 和 Base 在全频、中频(mid-3-freq)和高频(hi-3-freq)频段的信噪比(单向重复测量方差分析)和通过率(卡方检验)。 结果显示Base 和 WN 的 MPANL 相差 22.19 ㏈ (p=.000)。从 40 ㏈ SPL 起,Base 和 WN 的信噪比有明显差异,从 60 SPL 起,Base 和 Earmuff 的 PASS 率有明显差异(p<.005)。 结论:在 DPOAE 中,耳罩可增加 MPANL,从而能够在高达 60 ㏈ SPL 时进行记录。高频段的信噪比(SNR)比低频段的信噪比(SNR)保存得更好,因此,它在早期检测噪声或老化引起的耳蜗微结构变化方面似乎很有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Earmuff Using on Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Distortion Product OtoAcoustic Emission in White Noise Environments
Objective: Earmuff has been shown to attenuate noise and may be useful in boothless audiometry. This study aimed to determine the effect of earmuff use on the signal-to-noise ratio of distortion production otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) in a white noise environment. Method: Participants were 19 young, healthy men and women (38 ears) aged 22.45±1.31 years. The hearing threshold level in 1, 2, 3, and 4 ㎑ did not exceed 15 ㏈ HL. DPOAE was performed at four points per octave in the range 842 to 9,509 ㎐ based on f2. After obtaining the baseline (Base), white noise was presented at 10 ㏈ intervals from 40 to 70 ㏈ SPL. DPOAE was obtained without (WN) and with earmuff (Earmuff). The maximum permissible ambient noise level (MPANL) of the WN and Earmuff were compared (paired t-test). Signal-to-noise ratio (one-way repeated measures ANOVA) and PASS rate (Chi-square test) between WN, Earmuff and Base at the overall frequency, mid-frequency (mid-3-freq), and high-frequency (hi-3-freq) bands were analyzed. Results: There was a difference of 22.19 ㏈ in MPANL between Base and WN (p=.000). There was a significant difference in the SNR between Base and WN from 40 ㏈ SPL, and in PASS rate between Base and Earmuff from 60 SPL (p<.005). Conclusion: In DPOAE, earmuff increase MPANL, which enables recording at up to 60 ㏈ SPL. The SNR in the high-frequency band is more preserved than in the lower, Therefore, it seems advantageous for early detection of cochlear microstructural changes due to noise or aging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Earmuff Using on Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Distortion Product OtoAcoustic Emission in White Noise Environments Robot-assisted gait training in children with cerebral palsy: A case report The Research Trends of the Korean Society of Medicine & Therapy Science: From 2009 to 2022 The Relationship Between Participation in Leisure Activities and Emotional Regulation and Resilience in Occupational Therapy Students Effect of non-invasive treatments such as manual therapy, cryo therapy, and extracorporeal shock wave application on pain and joint function during the initial recovery process after spine and major joint surgery: Case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1