萨拉菲与苏菲之间:伊本-泰米耶和 al-Qusyairi 眼中的苏菲主义

Hamdan Maghribi, Alfina Hidayah
{"title":"萨拉菲与苏菲之间:伊本-泰米耶和 al-Qusyairi 眼中的苏菲主义","authors":"Hamdan Maghribi, Alfina Hidayah","doi":"10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i2.9618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses two sects that are often contrasted: Salafi and Sūfī. It focuses on the views of Ibn Taimiyyah al-Ḥarrānī as a representative of Salafi and ‘Abd Karīm al-Qusyairī of Sūfī-sunnī on Sufism. By analyzing the works of Ibn Taimiyyah and al-Qusyairī on tasawuf, this article describes their views and then compares them. Ibn Taimiyyah wrote no less than thirty-eight treatises on Sufism and cited more than forty Sūfī texts in explaining and analyzing his views on Sufism. Al-Qusyairī, on the other hand, describes in detail the Sūfī figures and their views in his Risālah. He also included his Sufistic analyses in Laṭāif al-Ishārāt. Using an interpretative approach and content analysis, this article finds that Ibn Taimiyyah did not reject Sufism. He rejected the practice of Sufism that he thought was not intertwined with the Qur’ān and Sunnah. This is evident from his respect for al-Qusyairī, whom he called al-Syaikh al-Ustāż, and Mutaṣawwifah Ahl al-Kalām, a term of honor within the Ṣūfī order. Nonetheless, Ibn Taymiyyah notes that al-Qusayrī’s quotations in his work are not followed by references and explanations. In explaining the practice of zuhd, al-Qusyairī did not provide examples from the ṣaḥābah and tābi'īn to strengthen his argument.","PeriodicalId":53315,"journal":{"name":"Tsaqafah","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antara Salafi dan Sufi: Tasawuf menurut Ibn Taimiyyah dan al-Qusyairi\",\"authors\":\"Hamdan Maghribi, Alfina Hidayah\",\"doi\":\"10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i2.9618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses two sects that are often contrasted: Salafi and Sūfī. It focuses on the views of Ibn Taimiyyah al-Ḥarrānī as a representative of Salafi and ‘Abd Karīm al-Qusyairī of Sūfī-sunnī on Sufism. By analyzing the works of Ibn Taimiyyah and al-Qusyairī on tasawuf, this article describes their views and then compares them. Ibn Taimiyyah wrote no less than thirty-eight treatises on Sufism and cited more than forty Sūfī texts in explaining and analyzing his views on Sufism. Al-Qusyairī, on the other hand, describes in detail the Sūfī figures and their views in his Risālah. He also included his Sufistic analyses in Laṭāif al-Ishārāt. Using an interpretative approach and content analysis, this article finds that Ibn Taimiyyah did not reject Sufism. He rejected the practice of Sufism that he thought was not intertwined with the Qur’ān and Sunnah. This is evident from his respect for al-Qusyairī, whom he called al-Syaikh al-Ustāż, and Mutaṣawwifah Ahl al-Kalām, a term of honor within the Ṣūfī order. Nonetheless, Ibn Taymiyyah notes that al-Qusayrī’s quotations in his work are not followed by references and explanations. In explaining the practice of zuhd, al-Qusyairī did not provide examples from the ṣaḥābah and tābi'īn to strengthen his argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tsaqafah\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tsaqafah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i2.9618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsaqafah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i2.9618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了两个经常被拿来对比的教派:萨拉菲和苏菲。文章重点讨论了萨拉菲的代表人物伊本-泰米耶-阿尔-哈拉尔尼和苏菲-苏尼的阿布德-卡里姆-库斯耶里对苏菲主义的看法。本文通过分析伊本-泰米耶和 al-Qusyairī 关于泰素夫的著作,阐述了他们的观点,然后对其进行了比较。伊本-泰米耶撰写了不少于 38 篇关于苏菲的论文,在解释和分析他对苏菲的观点时引用了 40 多部 Sūfī 经文。另一方面,Al-Qusyairī 在其 Risālah 中详细描述了苏菲人物及其观点。他还在 Laṭāif al-Ishārāt 中对苏菲进行了分析。本文采用解释性方法和内容分析,发现伊本-泰米耶并未拒绝苏菲主义。他拒绝接受他认为与《古兰经》和《圣训》不相关的苏菲派实践。这一点从他对被他称为 al-Syaikh al-Ustāż 的 al-Qusyairī 和 Mutaṣawwifah Ahl al-Kalām(Ṣūfī教派的尊称)的尊重中可见一斑。不过,伊本-泰米耶指出,库赛里在其著作中的引文后面并没有提供参考和解释。在解释 zuhd 的实践时,al-Qusyairī 没有提供 ṣaḥābah 和 tābi'īn 中的例子来加强他的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antara Salafi dan Sufi: Tasawuf menurut Ibn Taimiyyah dan al-Qusyairi
This article discusses two sects that are often contrasted: Salafi and Sūfī. It focuses on the views of Ibn Taimiyyah al-Ḥarrānī as a representative of Salafi and ‘Abd Karīm al-Qusyairī of Sūfī-sunnī on Sufism. By analyzing the works of Ibn Taimiyyah and al-Qusyairī on tasawuf, this article describes their views and then compares them. Ibn Taimiyyah wrote no less than thirty-eight treatises on Sufism and cited more than forty Sūfī texts in explaining and analyzing his views on Sufism. Al-Qusyairī, on the other hand, describes in detail the Sūfī figures and their views in his Risālah. He also included his Sufistic analyses in Laṭāif al-Ishārāt. Using an interpretative approach and content analysis, this article finds that Ibn Taimiyyah did not reject Sufism. He rejected the practice of Sufism that he thought was not intertwined with the Qur’ān and Sunnah. This is evident from his respect for al-Qusyairī, whom he called al-Syaikh al-Ustāż, and Mutaṣawwifah Ahl al-Kalām, a term of honor within the Ṣūfī order. Nonetheless, Ibn Taymiyyah notes that al-Qusayrī’s quotations in his work are not followed by references and explanations. In explaining the practice of zuhd, al-Qusyairī did not provide examples from the ṣaḥābah and tābi'īn to strengthen his argument.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
TRADISI GHATIB BEGHANYUT SEBUAH PERADABAN ISLAM PADA MASYARAKAT SIAK SRI INDRAPURA, RIAU Hikayat Raja Pasai Sebagai Sumber Historiografi Menurut Perspektif Syed M. Naquib Al-Attas Antara Salafi dan Sufi: Tasawuf menurut Ibn Taimiyyah dan al-Qusyairi Hasan Langgulung Thought on Islamic Education Character Transformation of Naposo Nauli Bulung in Religious Practice in South Tapanuli Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1