学术界对工程教育期末考试的看法

I. Gratchev, Simon Howell, Sascha Stegen
{"title":"学术界对工程教育期末考试的看法","authors":"I. Gratchev, Simon Howell, Sascha Stegen","doi":"10.1080/22054952.2023.2284484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to investigate academics’ perceptions and experiences with traditional final examinations in engineering courses. An online survey of 40 academics was conducted to understand the academics’ beliefs and rationale for the use of final examinations in their teaching practices. The survey was followed by in-person interviews with 11 academics to clarify the outcomes of the online survey. The results indicated that most academics considered the final examination as an effective and equitable way of assessing student knowledge and skills. However, the findings also showed that final examinations generally might not provide students with proper feedback, and traditional final examinations might not be effective in testing students’ practical and soft skills required by industry.","PeriodicalId":38191,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academics’ perception of final examinations in engineering education\",\"authors\":\"I. Gratchev, Simon Howell, Sascha Stegen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22054952.2023.2284484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study seeks to investigate academics’ perceptions and experiences with traditional final examinations in engineering courses. An online survey of 40 academics was conducted to understand the academics’ beliefs and rationale for the use of final examinations in their teaching practices. The survey was followed by in-person interviews with 11 academics to clarify the outcomes of the online survey. The results indicated that most academics considered the final examination as an effective and equitable way of assessing student knowledge and skills. However, the findings also showed that final examinations generally might not provide students with proper feedback, and traditional final examinations might not be effective in testing students’ practical and soft skills required by industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2284484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2284484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查学者们对工程学课程中传统期末考试的看法和经验。我们对 40 名学者进行了在线调查,以了解他们在教学实践中使用期末考试的信念和理由。调查结束后,还对 11 名学者进行了面对面访谈,以澄清在线调查的结果。结果表明,大多数学者认为期末考试是评估学生知识和技能的一种有效而公平的方式。然而,调查结果显示,期末考试一般可能无法为学生提供适当的反馈,传统的期末考试可能无法有效测试学生的实践能力和行业所需的软技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academics’ perception of final examinations in engineering education
This study seeks to investigate academics’ perceptions and experiences with traditional final examinations in engineering courses. An online survey of 40 academics was conducted to understand the academics’ beliefs and rationale for the use of final examinations in their teaching practices. The survey was followed by in-person interviews with 11 academics to clarify the outcomes of the online survey. The results indicated that most academics considered the final examination as an effective and equitable way of assessing student knowledge and skills. However, the findings also showed that final examinations generally might not provide students with proper feedback, and traditional final examinations might not be effective in testing students’ practical and soft skills required by industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering Development of the Bipolar Junction Transistor Diagnostic Test (BJTDT) to explore the second-year undergraduate Myanmar electronic and Thai electrical engineering students’ understanding of BJT working principles and applications Unfolding learning difficulties in engineering drawing problem solving Unfolding learning difficulties in engineering drawing problem solving Recontextualising the teaching learning cycle within engineering education to improve the development of written communication skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1