从法律角度分析经济学理论中的知识产权

A. S. Sudarwanto, Adi Sulistiyono, M. H. Asrori S, Arief Suryono, Y. T. Muryanto, D. Cahyaningsih, Dona Budi Kharisma
{"title":"从法律角度分析经济学理论中的知识产权","authors":"A. S. Sudarwanto, Adi Sulistiyono, M. H. Asrori S, Arief Suryono, Y. T. Muryanto, D. Cahyaningsih, Dona Budi Kharisma","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to describe the relevance of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law. The approach used is a historical approach (historical approach) using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used is the literature study technique. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that so far the focus of traditional economic analysts has only highlighted that inventors or holders of exclusive IPR are entitled to incentives or rewards for their findings. Apart from that, giving incentives is also to encourage people to make discoveries that are beneficial to human life. However, they did not highlight the high cost of accessing or using their findings. Even the cost of accessing IP exceeds the cost of the production margin of IP itself. In the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law, the condition of unbalanced margins can cause injustice.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"471 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THEORY OF ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OF LAW PERSPECTIVE\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Sudarwanto, Adi Sulistiyono, M. H. Asrori S, Arief Suryono, Y. T. Muryanto, D. Cahyaningsih, Dona Budi Kharisma\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to describe the relevance of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law. The approach used is a historical approach (historical approach) using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used is the literature study technique. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that so far the focus of traditional economic analysts has only highlighted that inventors or holders of exclusive IPR are entitled to incentives or rewards for their findings. Apart from that, giving incentives is also to encourage people to make discoveries that are beneficial to human life. However, they did not highlight the high cost of accessing or using their findings. Even the cost of accessing IP exceeds the cost of the production margin of IP itself. In the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law, the condition of unbalanced margins can cause injustice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Privat Law\",\"volume\":\"471 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Privat Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Privat Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在从法律经济分析理论的角度阐述知识产权(IPR)保护的相关性。采用的方法是历史方法(历史方法),使用的是第一手法律材料和第二手法律材料。采用的数据收集技术是文献研究技术。根据研究结果,可以得出这样的结论:迄今为止,传统经济分析家的研究重点只是强调发明人或独占知识产权持有人有权因其研究成果而获得激励或奖励。除此之外,给予奖励也是为了鼓励人们做出有益于人类生活的发现。然而,他们并没有强调获取或使用其成果的高昂成本。即使是获取知识产权的成本也超过了知识产权本身的生产成本。从法律经济分析理论的角度来看,不平衡的边际条件会造成不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THEORY OF ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OF LAW PERSPECTIVE
This article aims to describe the relevance of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law. The approach used is a historical approach (historical approach) using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used is the literature study technique. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that so far the focus of traditional economic analysts has only highlighted that inventors or holders of exclusive IPR are entitled to incentives or rewards for their findings. Apart from that, giving incentives is also to encourage people to make discoveries that are beneficial to human life. However, they did not highlight the high cost of accessing or using their findings. Even the cost of accessing IP exceeds the cost of the production margin of IP itself. In the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law, the condition of unbalanced margins can cause injustice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPLIKASI DAN MEKANISME EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO.18/PUU-XVII/2019 DALAM HAL DEBITUR WANPRESTASI URGENSI PENGATURAN JAMINAN KREDIT DALAM SEKTOR PEER TO PEER (P2P) LENDING DI INDONESIA TANGGUNG JAWAB PERDATA PARA PIHAK DALAM PERDAGANGAN MELALUI SISTEM ELEKTRONIK PADA STARTUP MULTINASIONAL LAZADA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PENERAPAN PRINSIP KYC PADA FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY P2P LENDING YANG AKOMODATIF BAGI PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM LENDER DALAM TRANSAKSI PEER TO PEER LENDING KAITANNYA PLATFORM YANG MELAKUKAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1