医疗转介材料中的因果话语结构:一种人文主义见解

Emmanuel Chinaguh, B. Akeredolu-Ale, Kehinde G. Adeosun, Hannah O. Adejumobi
{"title":"医疗转介材料中的因果话语结构:一种人文主义见解","authors":"Emmanuel Chinaguh, B. Akeredolu-Ale, Kehinde G. Adeosun, Hannah O. Adejumobi","doi":"10.13092/lo.123.10605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humanistic studies on medical causality from language studies have hardly explored how causality is constructed in medical referral materials, which is the research gap this study intends to fill. For data, forty completed National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) medical referral forms, comprising 842 words and medical signs, were purposively selected from a healthcare provider in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria, and subjected to discourse analysis with insights from the causal coherence categories of Mann/Thompson’s (1987) Rhetorical Structure Theory. The paper identified two causal relations/structures – nonvolitional cause and nonvolitional result – in the data. Each structure reveals the primacy of diagnosis among the medical processes of diagnosing, investigating and treating or referring. The diagnosis proposition is primed as the consequence of pathophysiological causation in a diagnostic schema; while in the medical referral process, it is elevated as the causation for a medical referral, for instance for further specialist review and management, in a medical-referral schema. The construal of the semantic parameter of non-volition in the coherence relations is aided by the reality that illness is not intended, except caused by self-harm or suicide. The relations were signalled by four signal types, which are genre, semantic, syntactic, and semiotic; and six specific signals – mapping, lexical overlap, lexical chain, adverbials, semiotic overlap, and lexical-semiotic chain. These are implicit signals that complement the concise presentation of the medical processes. To conclude, this research provides the causal modeling of some medical processes, which highlights the prominence of diagnosis in medical referrals.","PeriodicalId":56243,"journal":{"name":"Linguistik Online","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal discourse structures in medical referral materials: a humanistic insight\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Chinaguh, B. Akeredolu-Ale, Kehinde G. Adeosun, Hannah O. Adejumobi\",\"doi\":\"10.13092/lo.123.10605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Humanistic studies on medical causality from language studies have hardly explored how causality is constructed in medical referral materials, which is the research gap this study intends to fill. For data, forty completed National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) medical referral forms, comprising 842 words and medical signs, were purposively selected from a healthcare provider in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria, and subjected to discourse analysis with insights from the causal coherence categories of Mann/Thompson’s (1987) Rhetorical Structure Theory. The paper identified two causal relations/structures – nonvolitional cause and nonvolitional result – in the data. Each structure reveals the primacy of diagnosis among the medical processes of diagnosing, investigating and treating or referring. The diagnosis proposition is primed as the consequence of pathophysiological causation in a diagnostic schema; while in the medical referral process, it is elevated as the causation for a medical referral, for instance for further specialist review and management, in a medical-referral schema. The construal of the semantic parameter of non-volition in the coherence relations is aided by the reality that illness is not intended, except caused by self-harm or suicide. The relations were signalled by four signal types, which are genre, semantic, syntactic, and semiotic; and six specific signals – mapping, lexical overlap, lexical chain, adverbials, semiotic overlap, and lexical-semiotic chain. These are implicit signals that complement the concise presentation of the medical processes. To conclude, this research provides the causal modeling of some medical processes, which highlights the prominence of diagnosis in medical referrals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistik Online\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistik Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.123.10605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistik Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.123.10605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言研究中有关医疗因果关系的人文研究几乎没有探讨转诊材料中的因果关系是如何构建的,而这正是本研究想要填补的研究空白。本研究从尼日利亚奥贡州阿贝奥库塔市的一家医疗机构有目的地选取了 40 份填写完整的国家医疗保险局(NHIA)医疗转诊表(包括 842 个单词和医疗标志)作为数据,并根据 Mann/Thompson(1987 年)的修辞结构理论中的因果一致性类别进行了话语分析。 本文在数据中确定了两种因果关系/结构--非波动原因和非波动结果。每种结构都揭示了诊断在诊断、调查和治疗或转诊等医疗过程中的首要地位。在诊断模式中,诊断命题是作为病理生理学因果关系的结果;而在医疗转诊过程中,在医疗转诊模式中,诊断命题被提升为医疗转诊的因果关系,例如进一步的专家审查和管理。在连贯关系中,对 "不挥发 "这一语义参数的解释得益于这样一个现实,即除了自残或自杀导致的疾病外,其他疾病都不是有意为之的。这些关系由四种信号类型(即体裁、语义、句法和符号)和六种具体信号(即映射、词性重叠、词性链、副词、符号重叠和词性-符号链)来表示。这些都是隐性信号,是对医疗过程简明表述的补充。总之,本研究提供了一些医疗过程的因果模型,突出了诊断在医疗转诊中的重要地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal discourse structures in medical referral materials: a humanistic insight
Humanistic studies on medical causality from language studies have hardly explored how causality is constructed in medical referral materials, which is the research gap this study intends to fill. For data, forty completed National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) medical referral forms, comprising 842 words and medical signs, were purposively selected from a healthcare provider in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria, and subjected to discourse analysis with insights from the causal coherence categories of Mann/Thompson’s (1987) Rhetorical Structure Theory. The paper identified two causal relations/structures – nonvolitional cause and nonvolitional result – in the data. Each structure reveals the primacy of diagnosis among the medical processes of diagnosing, investigating and treating or referring. The diagnosis proposition is primed as the consequence of pathophysiological causation in a diagnostic schema; while in the medical referral process, it is elevated as the causation for a medical referral, for instance for further specialist review and management, in a medical-referral schema. The construal of the semantic parameter of non-volition in the coherence relations is aided by the reality that illness is not intended, except caused by self-harm or suicide. The relations were signalled by four signal types, which are genre, semantic, syntactic, and semiotic; and six specific signals – mapping, lexical overlap, lexical chain, adverbials, semiotic overlap, and lexical-semiotic chain. These are implicit signals that complement the concise presentation of the medical processes. To conclude, this research provides the causal modeling of some medical processes, which highlights the prominence of diagnosis in medical referrals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
#itsneverobliqua Aplicación del Principio del Pentatlón a la traducción mélica entre polaco y español The role of topic shift and conversation turn in the intonation of Italian wh-questions Toponymy in Brazilian Sign language. Some notes on phonemes and allophones in synchronic and diachronic descriptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1