印度洋马登-朱利安振荡(MJO)加热引起的内在可预测性限制:对热带和外热带远缘联系的影响

David Martin Straus, Daniella I. V. Domeisen, Sarah-Jane Lock, Franco Molteni, P. Yadav
{"title":"印度洋马登-朱利安振荡(MJO)加热引起的内在可预测性限制:对热带和外热带远缘联系的影响","authors":"David Martin Straus, Daniella I. V. Domeisen, Sarah-Jane Lock, Franco Molteni, P. Yadav","doi":"10.5194/wcd-4-1001-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Since the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is a major source for tropical and extratropical variability on weekly to monthly timescales, the intrinsic predictability of its global teleconnections is of great interest. As the tropical diabatic heating associated with the MJO ultimately drives these teleconnections, the variability in heating among ensemble forecasts initialized from the same episode of the MJO will limit this predictability. In order to assess this limitation, a suite of 60 d ensemble reforecasts has been carried out with the ECMWF forecast model, spanning 13 starting dates from 1 November and 1 January for different years. The initial dates were chosen so that phases 2 and 3 of the MJO (with anomalous tropical heating in the Indian Ocean sector) were present in the observed initial conditions. The 51 members of an individual ensemble use identical initial conditions for the atmosphere and ocean. Stochastic perturbations to the tendencies produced by the atmospheric physics parameterizations are applied only over the Indian Ocean region (50–120∘ E). This guarantees that the spread between reforecasts within an ensemble is due to perturbations in heat sources only in the Indian Ocean sector. The point-wise spread in the intra-ensemble (or error) variance of vertically integrated tropical heating Q is larger than the average ensemble mean signal even at early forecast times; however the planetary wave (PW) component of Q (zonal waves 1–3) is predictable for 25 to 45 d, the time taken for the error variance to reach 50 % to 70 % of saturation. These scales never reach 90 % of saturation during the forecasts. The upper-level tropical PW divergence is even more predictable than Q (40 to 50 d). In contrast, the PW component of the 200 hPa Rossby wave source, which is responsible for propagating the influence of tropical heating to the extratropics, is only predictable for 20 to 30 d. A substantial ensemble spread of 300 hPa meridional wind propagates from the tropics to the Northern Hemisphere storm-track regions by days 15–16. Following the growth of upper-tropospheric spread in planetary wave heat flux, the stratosphere provides a feedback in enhancing the error via downward propagation towards the end of the reforecasts.","PeriodicalId":508985,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrinsic predictability limits arising from Indian Ocean Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) heating: effects on tropical and extratropical teleconnections\",\"authors\":\"David Martin Straus, Daniella I. V. Domeisen, Sarah-Jane Lock, Franco Molteni, P. Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/wcd-4-1001-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Since the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is a major source for tropical and extratropical variability on weekly to monthly timescales, the intrinsic predictability of its global teleconnections is of great interest. As the tropical diabatic heating associated with the MJO ultimately drives these teleconnections, the variability in heating among ensemble forecasts initialized from the same episode of the MJO will limit this predictability. In order to assess this limitation, a suite of 60 d ensemble reforecasts has been carried out with the ECMWF forecast model, spanning 13 starting dates from 1 November and 1 January for different years. The initial dates were chosen so that phases 2 and 3 of the MJO (with anomalous tropical heating in the Indian Ocean sector) were present in the observed initial conditions. The 51 members of an individual ensemble use identical initial conditions for the atmosphere and ocean. Stochastic perturbations to the tendencies produced by the atmospheric physics parameterizations are applied only over the Indian Ocean region (50–120∘ E). This guarantees that the spread between reforecasts within an ensemble is due to perturbations in heat sources only in the Indian Ocean sector. The point-wise spread in the intra-ensemble (or error) variance of vertically integrated tropical heating Q is larger than the average ensemble mean signal even at early forecast times; however the planetary wave (PW) component of Q (zonal waves 1–3) is predictable for 25 to 45 d, the time taken for the error variance to reach 50 % to 70 % of saturation. These scales never reach 90 % of saturation during the forecasts. The upper-level tropical PW divergence is even more predictable than Q (40 to 50 d). In contrast, the PW component of the 200 hPa Rossby wave source, which is responsible for propagating the influence of tropical heating to the extratropics, is only predictable for 20 to 30 d. A substantial ensemble spread of 300 hPa meridional wind propagates from the tropics to the Northern Hemisphere storm-track regions by days 15–16. Following the growth of upper-tropospheric spread in planetary wave heat flux, the stratosphere provides a feedback in enhancing the error via downward propagation towards the end of the reforecasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Climate Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Climate Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-1001-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-1001-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要由于马登-朱利安振荡(MJO)是每周至每月时间尺度上热带和外热带变率的主要来源,因此其全球远缘联系的内在可预测性备受关注。由于与 MJO 相关的热带对流加热最终会驱动这些远缘联系,因此从 MJO 的同一事件初始化的集合预报中的加热变异性会限制这种可预测性。为了评估这一局限性,利用 ECMWF 预测模式进行了一套 60 天的集合再预测,从 11 月 1 日到次年 1 月 1 日共 13 个起始日期。初始日期的选择是为了在观测到的初始条件中出现 MJO 的第 2 和第 3 阶段(印度洋扇区热带异常升温)。单个集合的 51 个成员使用相同的大气和海洋初始条件。对大气物理学参数化产生的趋势的随机扰动只应用于印度洋区域(50-120∘ E)。这就保证了集合内各重报之间的差异仅由印度洋区域的热源扰动引起。即使在早期预报时间,垂直集成热带热量 Q 的集合内(或误差)方差的点状扩散也比平均集合平均信号大;但是 Q 的行星波(PW)分量(1-3 级带状波)在 25 到 45 d 内是可预测的,这段时间误差方差达到饱和的 50%到 70%。在预报期间,这些尺度从未达到饱和的 90%。上层热带脉宽调偏离比 Q 更可预测(40 至 50 d)。相比之下,200 hPa Rossby 波源的脉动波分量(负责将热带加热的影响传播到外热带)只能预测 20 到 30 d。到第 15-16 天,300 hPa 经向风的大量集合扩散将从热带传播到北半球风暴道地区。随着行波热通量在上对流层扩散的增加,平流层在再预报末期通过向下传播提供了一个反馈,从而增加了误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intrinsic predictability limits arising from Indian Ocean Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) heating: effects on tropical and extratropical teleconnections
Abstract. Since the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is a major source for tropical and extratropical variability on weekly to monthly timescales, the intrinsic predictability of its global teleconnections is of great interest. As the tropical diabatic heating associated with the MJO ultimately drives these teleconnections, the variability in heating among ensemble forecasts initialized from the same episode of the MJO will limit this predictability. In order to assess this limitation, a suite of 60 d ensemble reforecasts has been carried out with the ECMWF forecast model, spanning 13 starting dates from 1 November and 1 January for different years. The initial dates were chosen so that phases 2 and 3 of the MJO (with anomalous tropical heating in the Indian Ocean sector) were present in the observed initial conditions. The 51 members of an individual ensemble use identical initial conditions for the atmosphere and ocean. Stochastic perturbations to the tendencies produced by the atmospheric physics parameterizations are applied only over the Indian Ocean region (50–120∘ E). This guarantees that the spread between reforecasts within an ensemble is due to perturbations in heat sources only in the Indian Ocean sector. The point-wise spread in the intra-ensemble (or error) variance of vertically integrated tropical heating Q is larger than the average ensemble mean signal even at early forecast times; however the planetary wave (PW) component of Q (zonal waves 1–3) is predictable for 25 to 45 d, the time taken for the error variance to reach 50 % to 70 % of saturation. These scales never reach 90 % of saturation during the forecasts. The upper-level tropical PW divergence is even more predictable than Q (40 to 50 d). In contrast, the PW component of the 200 hPa Rossby wave source, which is responsible for propagating the influence of tropical heating to the extratropics, is only predictable for 20 to 30 d. A substantial ensemble spread of 300 hPa meridional wind propagates from the tropics to the Northern Hemisphere storm-track regions by days 15–16. Following the growth of upper-tropospheric spread in planetary wave heat flux, the stratosphere provides a feedback in enhancing the error via downward propagation towards the end of the reforecasts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the daytime boundary layer evolution based on Doppler spectrum width from multiple coplanar wind lidars during CROSSINN Understanding winter windstorm predictability over Europe How heating tracers drive self-lofting long-lived stratospheric anticyclones: simple dynamical models Warm conveyor belt characteristics and impacts along the life cycle of extratropical cyclones: case studies and climatological analysis based on ERA5 Quantifying uncertainty in simulations of the West African monsoon with the use of surrogate models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1