EMG 和 IMU 数据融合用于经胫截肢者的运动模式分类

Omar A. Gonzales-Huisa, Gonzalo Oshiro, Victoria E. Abarca, Jorge G. Chavez-Echajaya, Dante A. Elias
{"title":"EMG 和 IMU 数据融合用于经胫截肢者的运动模式分类","authors":"Omar A. Gonzales-Huisa, Gonzalo Oshiro, Victoria E. Abarca, Jorge G. Chavez-Echajaya, Dante A. Elias","doi":"10.3390/prosthesis5040085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite recent advancements in prosthetic technology, lower-limb amputees often remain limited to passive prostheses, which leads to an asymmetric gait and increased energy expenditure. Developing active prostheses with effective control systems is important to improve mobility for these individuals. This study presents a machine-learning-based approach to classify five distinct locomotion tasks: ground-level walking (GWL), ramp ascent (RPA), ramp descent (RPD), stairs ascent (SSA), and stairs descent (SSD). The dataset comprises fused electromyographic (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals from twenty non-amputated and five transtibial amputated participants. EMG sensors were strategically positioned on the thigh muscles, while IMU sensors were placed on various leg segments. The performance of two classification algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and long short-term memory (LSTM), were evaluated on segmented data. The results indicate that SVM models outperform LSTM models in accuracy, precision, and F1 score in the individual evaluation of amputee and non-amputee datasets for 80–20 and 50–50 data distributions. In the 80–20 distribution, an accuracy of 95.46% and 95.35% was obtained with SVM for non-amputees and amputees, respectively. An accuracy of 93.33% and 93.30% was obtained for non-amputees and amputees by using LSTM, respectively. LSTM models show more robustness and inter-population generalizability than SVM models when applying domain-adaptation techniques. Furthermore, the average classification latency for SVM and LSTM models was 19.84 ms and 37.07 ms, respectively, within acceptable limits for real-time applications. This study contributes to the field by comprehensively comparing SVM and LSTM classifiers for locomotion tasks, laying the foundation for the future development of real-time control systems for active transtibial prostheses.","PeriodicalId":506748,"journal":{"name":"Prosthesis","volume":"291 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMG and IMU Data Fusion for Locomotion Mode Classification in Transtibial Amputees\",\"authors\":\"Omar A. Gonzales-Huisa, Gonzalo Oshiro, Victoria E. Abarca, Jorge G. Chavez-Echajaya, Dante A. Elias\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/prosthesis5040085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite recent advancements in prosthetic technology, lower-limb amputees often remain limited to passive prostheses, which leads to an asymmetric gait and increased energy expenditure. Developing active prostheses with effective control systems is important to improve mobility for these individuals. This study presents a machine-learning-based approach to classify five distinct locomotion tasks: ground-level walking (GWL), ramp ascent (RPA), ramp descent (RPD), stairs ascent (SSA), and stairs descent (SSD). The dataset comprises fused electromyographic (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals from twenty non-amputated and five transtibial amputated participants. EMG sensors were strategically positioned on the thigh muscles, while IMU sensors were placed on various leg segments. The performance of two classification algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and long short-term memory (LSTM), were evaluated on segmented data. The results indicate that SVM models outperform LSTM models in accuracy, precision, and F1 score in the individual evaluation of amputee and non-amputee datasets for 80–20 and 50–50 data distributions. In the 80–20 distribution, an accuracy of 95.46% and 95.35% was obtained with SVM for non-amputees and amputees, respectively. An accuracy of 93.33% and 93.30% was obtained for non-amputees and amputees by using LSTM, respectively. LSTM models show more robustness and inter-population generalizability than SVM models when applying domain-adaptation techniques. Furthermore, the average classification latency for SVM and LSTM models was 19.84 ms and 37.07 ms, respectively, within acceptable limits for real-time applications. This study contributes to the field by comprehensively comparing SVM and LSTM classifiers for locomotion tasks, laying the foundation for the future development of real-time control systems for active transtibial prostheses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthesis\",\"volume\":\"291 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5040085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5040085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管近年来假肢技术不断进步,但下肢截肢者通常仍只能使用被动假肢,这导致步态不对称和能量消耗增加。开发具有有效控制系统的主动假肢对改善这些人的行动能力非常重要。本研究提出了一种基于机器学习的方法来对五种不同的运动任务进行分类:地面行走(GWL)、斜坡上升(RPA)、斜坡下降(RPD)、楼梯上升(SSA)和楼梯下降(SSD)。数据集包括 20 名非截肢者和 5 名截肢者的融合肌电图(EMG)和惯性测量单元(IMU)信号。EMG 传感器被战略性地放置在大腿肌肉上,而 IMU 传感器则被放置在腿部的不同部位。在分段数据上评估了支持向量机(SVM)和长短期记忆(LSTM)这两种分类算法的性能。结果表明,在对 80-20 和 50-50 数据分布的截肢者和非截肢者数据集进行单独评估时,SVM 模型在准确度、精确度和 F1 分数方面均优于 LSTM 模型。在 80-20 分布中,SVM 对非截肢者和截肢者的准确率分别为 95.46% 和 95.35%。使用 LSTM,非截肢者和截肢者的准确率分别为 93.33% 和 93.30%。在应用领域适应技术时,LSTM 模型比 SVM 模型显示出更强的鲁棒性和群体间通用性。此外,SVM 和 LSTM 模型的平均分类延迟时间分别为 19.84 毫秒和 37.07 毫秒,在实时应用可接受的范围内。本研究全面比较了 SVM 和 LSTM 分类器在运动任务中的应用,为该领域做出了贡献,为未来开发主动式经胫假肢实时控制系统奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMG and IMU Data Fusion for Locomotion Mode Classification in Transtibial Amputees
Despite recent advancements in prosthetic technology, lower-limb amputees often remain limited to passive prostheses, which leads to an asymmetric gait and increased energy expenditure. Developing active prostheses with effective control systems is important to improve mobility for these individuals. This study presents a machine-learning-based approach to classify five distinct locomotion tasks: ground-level walking (GWL), ramp ascent (RPA), ramp descent (RPD), stairs ascent (SSA), and stairs descent (SSD). The dataset comprises fused electromyographic (EMG) and inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals from twenty non-amputated and five transtibial amputated participants. EMG sensors were strategically positioned on the thigh muscles, while IMU sensors were placed on various leg segments. The performance of two classification algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and long short-term memory (LSTM), were evaluated on segmented data. The results indicate that SVM models outperform LSTM models in accuracy, precision, and F1 score in the individual evaluation of amputee and non-amputee datasets for 80–20 and 50–50 data distributions. In the 80–20 distribution, an accuracy of 95.46% and 95.35% was obtained with SVM for non-amputees and amputees, respectively. An accuracy of 93.33% and 93.30% was obtained for non-amputees and amputees by using LSTM, respectively. LSTM models show more robustness and inter-population generalizability than SVM models when applying domain-adaptation techniques. Furthermore, the average classification latency for SVM and LSTM models was 19.84 ms and 37.07 ms, respectively, within acceptable limits for real-time applications. This study contributes to the field by comprehensively comparing SVM and LSTM classifiers for locomotion tasks, laying the foundation for the future development of real-time control systems for active transtibial prostheses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Results of Third Generation of Rotating Hinge Arthroplasty in Patients with Poliomyelitis Analysis of Early-Retrieved Dual-Mobility Polyethylene Liners for Total Hip Replacement Clinical Effects of Interproximal Contact Loss between Teeth and Implant-Supported Prostheses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Mortality Rate in Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures: Impact of Time to Surgery Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Agenesis of Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A 2-Year Prospective Clinical Study with Full Digital Workflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1