政策对农业创新传播的影响:对评估方法的系统回顾

IF 3.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Outlook on Agriculture Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1177/00307270231215837
Imane El Bakali, Youssef Brouziyne, Abdelkader Ait El Mekki, Nassreddine Maatala, R. Harbouze
{"title":"政策对农业创新传播的影响:对评估方法的系统回顾","authors":"Imane El Bakali, Youssef Brouziyne, Abdelkader Ait El Mekki, Nassreddine Maatala, R. Harbouze","doi":"10.1177/00307270231215837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demand for sustainable agricultural technologies still lags behind the supply confirming the demand articulation failure of transformational innovation change agricultural policies. To understand the reasons for demand shortcomings, the evaluation of developed policies is required. In the literature, there is little evidence on this topic, henceforth, this paper conducts a systematic review of the primary methodological approaches used to assess the influence of policies on the dissemination of agricultural innovations. The results showed that there are two clusters of evaluation; the first investigates how policies affect agricultural innovation adoption, and the second studies how policies affect yields and profitability. For the first cluster, 70% of the studies analyzed adoption decisions using the Double-hurdle, Probit, or Tobit models or captured changes in adoption levels over time using the Adoption and Diffusion Outcome Prediction Tool and discrete-time duration models. This cluster is related to the assessment of the input and output additionalities of innovation policies. In 58% of the studies related to the second cluster, the focus was the assessment of economic and environmental implications using mathematical programming models, particularly agent-based modeling. The purpose of evaluation in this cluster is more focused on behavioral additionality. There were no experimental or quasi-experimental methods among the methods utilized in this cluster. The majority of studies do not incorporate the evaluation of economic, social, and environmental aspects together; therefore, evaluation outlooks suggest increasing interest in sustainability impact. It is suggested that models from both clusters be used in combination to explore input, output, and behavioral additionalities simultaneously. Furthermore, including white-box evaluation approaches to evaluate demand-oriented innovation policy in the agricultural sector, in addition to usual black-box approaches, is a necessity.","PeriodicalId":54661,"journal":{"name":"Outlook on Agriculture","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of policies on the diffusion of agricultural innovations: Systematic review on evaluation approaches\",\"authors\":\"Imane El Bakali, Youssef Brouziyne, Abdelkader Ait El Mekki, Nassreddine Maatala, R. Harbouze\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00307270231215837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The demand for sustainable agricultural technologies still lags behind the supply confirming the demand articulation failure of transformational innovation change agricultural policies. To understand the reasons for demand shortcomings, the evaluation of developed policies is required. In the literature, there is little evidence on this topic, henceforth, this paper conducts a systematic review of the primary methodological approaches used to assess the influence of policies on the dissemination of agricultural innovations. The results showed that there are two clusters of evaluation; the first investigates how policies affect agricultural innovation adoption, and the second studies how policies affect yields and profitability. For the first cluster, 70% of the studies analyzed adoption decisions using the Double-hurdle, Probit, or Tobit models or captured changes in adoption levels over time using the Adoption and Diffusion Outcome Prediction Tool and discrete-time duration models. This cluster is related to the assessment of the input and output additionalities of innovation policies. In 58% of the studies related to the second cluster, the focus was the assessment of economic and environmental implications using mathematical programming models, particularly agent-based modeling. The purpose of evaluation in this cluster is more focused on behavioral additionality. There were no experimental or quasi-experimental methods among the methods utilized in this cluster. The majority of studies do not incorporate the evaluation of economic, social, and environmental aspects together; therefore, evaluation outlooks suggest increasing interest in sustainability impact. It is suggested that models from both clusters be used in combination to explore input, output, and behavioral additionalities simultaneously. Furthermore, including white-box evaluation approaches to evaluate demand-oriented innovation policy in the agricultural sector, in addition to usual black-box approaches, is a necessity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Outlook on Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Outlook on Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270231215837\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outlook on Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270231215837","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对可持续农业技术的需求仍然落后于供给,这证实了转型创新变革农业政策的需求衔接失败。为了解需求不足的原因,需要对已制定的政策进行评估。在文献中,有关这一主题的证据很少,因此,本文对用于评估政策对农业创新传播影响的主要方法进行了系统综述。结果表明,评估方法有两类:第一类是调查政策如何影响农业创新的采用,第二类是研究政策如何影响产量和盈利能力。在第一类研究中,70%的研究使用双赫德模型、普罗比特模型或托比特模型分析了采用决策,或使用采用和扩散结果预测工具和离散时间持续模型捕捉了采用水平随时间的变化。这组研究与创新政策的投入和产出额外性评估有关。在与第二组相关的 58% 的研究中,重点是利用数学编程模型,特别是基于代理的模型,评估对经济和环境的影响。这一组的评估目的更侧重于行为额外性。这一组中没有使用实验或准实验方法。大多数研究没有将经济、社会和环境方面的评估结合在一起;因此,评估展望表明,人们对可持续发展的影响越来越感兴趣。建议将这两组方法中的模型结合起来使用,以同时探索投入、产出和行为的额外性。此外,除了通常的黑箱评估方法外,还需要采用白箱评估方法来评估农业部门以需求为导向的创新政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of policies on the diffusion of agricultural innovations: Systematic review on evaluation approaches
The demand for sustainable agricultural technologies still lags behind the supply confirming the demand articulation failure of transformational innovation change agricultural policies. To understand the reasons for demand shortcomings, the evaluation of developed policies is required. In the literature, there is little evidence on this topic, henceforth, this paper conducts a systematic review of the primary methodological approaches used to assess the influence of policies on the dissemination of agricultural innovations. The results showed that there are two clusters of evaluation; the first investigates how policies affect agricultural innovation adoption, and the second studies how policies affect yields and profitability. For the first cluster, 70% of the studies analyzed adoption decisions using the Double-hurdle, Probit, or Tobit models or captured changes in adoption levels over time using the Adoption and Diffusion Outcome Prediction Tool and discrete-time duration models. This cluster is related to the assessment of the input and output additionalities of innovation policies. In 58% of the studies related to the second cluster, the focus was the assessment of economic and environmental implications using mathematical programming models, particularly agent-based modeling. The purpose of evaluation in this cluster is more focused on behavioral additionality. There were no experimental or quasi-experimental methods among the methods utilized in this cluster. The majority of studies do not incorporate the evaluation of economic, social, and environmental aspects together; therefore, evaluation outlooks suggest increasing interest in sustainability impact. It is suggested that models from both clusters be used in combination to explore input, output, and behavioral additionalities simultaneously. Furthermore, including white-box evaluation approaches to evaluate demand-oriented innovation policy in the agricultural sector, in addition to usual black-box approaches, is a necessity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Outlook on Agriculture
Outlook on Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Outlook on Agriculture is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, which welcomes original research papers, research notes, invited reviews and commentary for an international and interdisciplinary readership. Special attention is paid to agricultural policy, international trade in the agricultural sector, strategic developments in food production, the links between agricultural systems and food security, the role of agriculture in social and economic development, agriculture in developing countries and environmental issues, including natural resources for agriculture and climate impacts.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual property rights and plants made by new genomic techniques: Access to technology and gene-edited traits in plant breeding Motivation and opportunity may drive Tunisian farmers to reduce chemical pesticides in horticulture Deciphering the crux of women's empowerment in agricultural value chains – A scoping review Gendered impacts of COVID-19 in agri-food system and recovery pathways in India: A systematic review Opinion leaders’ influence on knowledge transmission about crop diseases management: Exploring the attributes that matter to followers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1