记录 1 月 6 日对美国国会大厦的袭击:德国和美国历史与当代教学视角的案例比较研究

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Comparative and International Education Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1177/17454999231216051
Paul G. Fitchett, Carolin Hestler, Franziska Rein
{"title":"记录 1 月 6 日对美国国会大厦的袭击:德国和美国历史与当代教学视角的案例比较研究","authors":"Paul G. Fitchett, Carolin Hestler, Franziska Rein","doi":"10.1177/17454999231216051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The storming of the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021 shocked the world and challenged democratic norms. Considerations on how to teach the events of January 6th remains an open question, not just for the United States but for other democratic nations, including Germany. This comparative case study explored the similarities and differences in how US and German social studies/history teachers made meaning of the January 6th attack and their rationale for teaching (or in some cases not teaching) the event. The international comparison sheds light on how threats to democracy are perceived by educators and their pedagogical rationales for teaching them. Findings suggest that teachers’ analysis of media credibility and instructional decision-making were complicated by their social and cultural connections to the event. German participants expressed a greater willingness to teach the events of the insurrection compared to their US counterparts. This study offers recommendations beyond teaching January 6th for teacher educators and education stakeholders supportive of teaching difficult and controversial histories. Exploring these international comparisons also calls into question how events are remembered and taught, potentially impacting democratic education.","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"547 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Documenting the January 6 attack on the US Capitol: A comparative case study on German and US perspectives for teaching the historical and the contemporary\",\"authors\":\"Paul G. Fitchett, Carolin Hestler, Franziska Rein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17454999231216051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The storming of the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021 shocked the world and challenged democratic norms. Considerations on how to teach the events of January 6th remains an open question, not just for the United States but for other democratic nations, including Germany. This comparative case study explored the similarities and differences in how US and German social studies/history teachers made meaning of the January 6th attack and their rationale for teaching (or in some cases not teaching) the event. The international comparison sheds light on how threats to democracy are perceived by educators and their pedagogical rationales for teaching them. Findings suggest that teachers’ analysis of media credibility and instructional decision-making were complicated by their social and cultural connections to the event. German participants expressed a greater willingness to teach the events of the insurrection compared to their US counterparts. This study offers recommendations beyond teaching January 6th for teacher educators and education stakeholders supportive of teaching difficult and controversial histories. Exploring these international comparisons also calls into question how events are remembered and taught, potentially impacting democratic education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"547 - 568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231216051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231216051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021 年 1 月 6 日发生的冲击美国国会大厦事件震惊了世界,对民主准则提出了挑战。如何教授 1 月 6 日的事件,不仅对美国,而且对包括德国在内的其他民主国家来说,都是一个未决问题。这项比较案例研究探讨了美国和德国的社会研究/历史教师如何理解 1 月 6 日袭击事件的异同,以及他们教授(或在某些情况下不教授)这一事件的理由。这项国际比较研究揭示了教育工作者如何看待对民主的威胁以及他们的教学理念。研究结果表明,教师对媒体可信度的分析和教学决策因其与该事件的社会和文化联系而变得复杂。与美国同行相比,德国参与者更愿意教授起义事件。本研究为教师教育者和支持教授困难和有争议历史的教育相关方提供了除教授 1 月 6 日事件以外的建议。对这些国际比较的探索也对如何记忆和教授这些事件提出了质疑,并可能对民主教育产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Documenting the January 6 attack on the US Capitol: A comparative case study on German and US perspectives for teaching the historical and the contemporary
The storming of the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021 shocked the world and challenged democratic norms. Considerations on how to teach the events of January 6th remains an open question, not just for the United States but for other democratic nations, including Germany. This comparative case study explored the similarities and differences in how US and German social studies/history teachers made meaning of the January 6th attack and their rationale for teaching (or in some cases not teaching) the event. The international comparison sheds light on how threats to democracy are perceived by educators and their pedagogical rationales for teaching them. Findings suggest that teachers’ analysis of media credibility and instructional decision-making were complicated by their social and cultural connections to the event. German participants expressed a greater willingness to teach the events of the insurrection compared to their US counterparts. This study offers recommendations beyond teaching January 6th for teacher educators and education stakeholders supportive of teaching difficult and controversial histories. Exploring these international comparisons also calls into question how events are remembered and taught, potentially impacting democratic education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
期刊最新文献
The adoption of dual Vocational Education and Training in Spain: Analysis of descentralised decision-making in educational policy transfer International partnership of Japanese university: Reciprocity and stratification of study abroad Factors that play a role in international PhD candidates’ social experiences with inclusion and integration in an international learning environment: A narrative inquiry in a Dutch research university Lifelong education policies in Europe and Latin America Looking at Ukrainian technical and vocational education and training before the war: Consequences of a meritocratic orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1