{"title":"Kurikulum Merdeka 七年级初中英语教科书 \"English For Nusantara \"的内容分析","authors":"Melania Indar Nur Febraningrum, Bambang Suroso","doi":"10.30595/pssh.v13i.897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze English textbook entitled English for Nusantara for grade 7 junior high school students at the Kurikulum Merdeka and to find out all the strengths and the weaknesses of this book in the items aims and approach, language content, skills, topic, methodology, and practical consideration determined by Cunningsworth's theory (1995). The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method with content analysis and literature study. The subjects in this study are the 5 chapters contained in the English for Nusantara textbook. In collecting data, the writer makes a table and evaluates each item determined from Cunningsworth's theory (1995). In data analysis techniques, the percentage of item fulfillment is calculated by dividing the total criteria met by the total number of criteria for each item then multiplied by 100%. Then determine the strengths and the weaknesses of each of these items. The results of this study indicate that the English textbook English for Nusantara fulfills an average of 94% in the \"Good\" category with items aims and approach (100%), language content (66.67%), skills (100%), topic (100%), methodology (100%), and practical consideration (100%) and has its strengths and weaknesses inside.","PeriodicalId":426946,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities","volume":"63 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Content Analysis of English Textbook “English For Nusantara” for 7 Grade Junior High School in Kurikulum Merdeka\",\"authors\":\"Melania Indar Nur Febraningrum, Bambang Suroso\",\"doi\":\"10.30595/pssh.v13i.897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze English textbook entitled English for Nusantara for grade 7 junior high school students at the Kurikulum Merdeka and to find out all the strengths and the weaknesses of this book in the items aims and approach, language content, skills, topic, methodology, and practical consideration determined by Cunningsworth's theory (1995). The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method with content analysis and literature study. The subjects in this study are the 5 chapters contained in the English for Nusantara textbook. In collecting data, the writer makes a table and evaluates each item determined from Cunningsworth's theory (1995). In data analysis techniques, the percentage of item fulfillment is calculated by dividing the total criteria met by the total number of criteria for each item then multiplied by 100%. Then determine the strengths and the weaknesses of each of these items. The results of this study indicate that the English textbook English for Nusantara fulfills an average of 94% in the \\\"Good\\\" category with items aims and approach (100%), language content (66.67%), skills (100%), topic (100%), methodology (100%), and practical consideration (100%) and has its strengths and weaknesses inside.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities\",\"volume\":\"63 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v13i.897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v13i.897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在分析针对默迪卡学校(Kurikulum Merdeka)初中七年级学生的英语教科书《南洋英语》(English for Nusantara),并根据康宁斯沃斯理论(Cunningsworth's theory,1995 年)找出该教科书在目标和方法、语言内容、技能、主题、方法和实际考虑等方面的优缺点。本研究采用的方法是定性描述法,包括内容分析和文献研究。本研究的对象是《南洋英语》教科书中的 5 个章节。在收集数据时,作者根据 Cunningsworth 的理论(1995 年)制作了一个表格,并对每个项目进行了评估。在数据分析技术中,项目完成百分比的计算方法是将每个项目符合的标准总数除以标准总数,然后乘以 100%。然后确定每个项目的优缺点。本研究结果表明,英语教科书《English for Nusantara》在目标和方法(100%)、语言内容(66.67%)、技能(100%)、主题(100%)、方法(100%)和实际考虑(100%)等项目上平均达到了 94%的 "好 "等级,同时也有其优缺点。
A Content Analysis of English Textbook “English For Nusantara” for 7 Grade Junior High School in Kurikulum Merdeka
This study aims to analyze English textbook entitled English for Nusantara for grade 7 junior high school students at the Kurikulum Merdeka and to find out all the strengths and the weaknesses of this book in the items aims and approach, language content, skills, topic, methodology, and practical consideration determined by Cunningsworth's theory (1995). The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method with content analysis and literature study. The subjects in this study are the 5 chapters contained in the English for Nusantara textbook. In collecting data, the writer makes a table and evaluates each item determined from Cunningsworth's theory (1995). In data analysis techniques, the percentage of item fulfillment is calculated by dividing the total criteria met by the total number of criteria for each item then multiplied by 100%. Then determine the strengths and the weaknesses of each of these items. The results of this study indicate that the English textbook English for Nusantara fulfills an average of 94% in the "Good" category with items aims and approach (100%), language content (66.67%), skills (100%), topic (100%), methodology (100%), and practical consideration (100%) and has its strengths and weaknesses inside.