知识产权的 "不公正享有":一个预言性的法律范式

Made Jayantara, I. G. A. Kurniawan, Putu Aras Samsithawrati
{"title":"知识产权的 \"不公正享有\":一个预言性的法律范式","authors":"Made Jayantara, I. G. A. Kurniawan, Putu Aras Samsithawrati","doi":"10.26532/jph.v10i2.30673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze the implications of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights and the orientation of the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights from a prophetic law perspective. This research is a normative legal research using a case, concept, and statutory approach. The results of the study state that the implication of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights is intended to protect creators of works or holders of intellectual property rights, especially in fulfilling economic rights. The orientation of the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights in the perspective of prophetic law is that the Supreme Court Decision which becomes jurisprudence must be a guide and guide for judges in resolving cases related to Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights. The main finding in this study is that three aspects of prophetic law, namely liberation, humanization, and transcendence are three aspects that must be met and considered in the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in all rules related to intellectual property rights, including the formulation of sanctions as well as legal remedies that can be taken if there is a loss suffered by the holder of intellectual property rights.","PeriodicalId":34168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: A PROPHETIC LEGAL PARADIGM\",\"authors\":\"Made Jayantara, I. G. A. Kurniawan, Putu Aras Samsithawrati\",\"doi\":\"10.26532/jph.v10i2.30673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to analyze the implications of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights and the orientation of the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights from a prophetic law perspective. This research is a normative legal research using a case, concept, and statutory approach. The results of the study state that the implication of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights is intended to protect creators of works or holders of intellectual property rights, especially in fulfilling economic rights. The orientation of the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights in the perspective of prophetic law is that the Supreme Court Decision which becomes jurisprudence must be a guide and guide for judges in resolving cases related to Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights. The main finding in this study is that three aspects of prophetic law, namely liberation, humanization, and transcendence are three aspects that must be met and considered in the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in all rules related to intellectual property rights, including the formulation of sanctions as well as legal remedies that can be taken if there is a loss suffered by the holder of intellectual property rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i2.30673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i2.30673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是从预言法的角度分析不当得利概念在知识产权领域的含义以及不当得利概念在知识产权领域的适用方向。本研究是一项采用案例、概念和成文法方法进行的规范性法律研究。研究结果表明,"不当得利 "概念在知识产权领域的含义旨在保护作品的创作者或知识产权的持有人,尤其是在实现经济权利方面。从预言法的角度来看,在知识产权领域适用不当得利概念的定位是,成为判例的最高法院判决必须成为法官解决知识产权领域不当得利相关案件的指南和向导。本研究的主要发现是,先知法的三个方面,即解放、人性化和超越性,是在与知识产权有关的所有规则中适用不当得利概念时必须满足和考虑的三个方面,包括制定制裁措施以及在知识产权持有人遭受损失时可以采取的法律救济措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE “UNJUST ENRICHMENT” IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: A PROPHETIC LEGAL PARADIGM
The purpose of this study is to analyze the implications of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights and the orientation of the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights from a prophetic law perspective. This research is a normative legal research using a case, concept, and statutory approach. The results of the study state that the implication of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights is intended to protect creators of works or holders of intellectual property rights, especially in fulfilling economic rights. The orientation of the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights in the perspective of prophetic law is that the Supreme Court Decision which becomes jurisprudence must be a guide and guide for judges in resolving cases related to Unjust Enrichment in the realm of intellectual property rights. The main finding in this study is that three aspects of prophetic law, namely liberation, humanization, and transcendence are three aspects that must be met and considered in the application of the concept of Unjust Enrichment in all rules related to intellectual property rights, including the formulation of sanctions as well as legal remedies that can be taken if there is a loss suffered by the holder of intellectual property rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE FOR NARCOTICS ADDICTS BASED ON LEGAL BENEFITS DEVELOPMENT OF THE HERITAGE CENTER AS BANKRUPTCY CURATOR ONE SOLUTION OF DIGITIZING LAND SERVICES TO PREVENT LAND MAFIA IN NIGERIA CONSIDERATION OF JUDGES OF THE PANDAN RELIGIOUS COURT IN DETERMINING THE STATUS OF THE DEFENDANT / INVISIBLE APPLICANT: MAQASHID AL-USRAH PERSPECTIVE THE LEGAL PROTECTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN PEER TO PEER LENDING-BASED FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY ASPECT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1