二胜于一--从两个角度审视生物专用主题知识包及其 T 维度

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Research on Technology in Education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15391523.2022.2030268
Lena von Kotzebue
{"title":"二胜于一--从两个角度审视生物专用主题知识包及其 T 维度","authors":"Lena von Kotzebue","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2022.2030268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Until now, TPACK has mostly been measured by subject-unspecific self-report measures. In contrast, this study introduces and analyzes an objective and biology-specific performance assessment of the four T-dimensions of TPACK. This instrument was used in combination with a biology-specific self-report measure to examine 206 biology teacher students at an Austrian university. Using two test instruments to measure the same construct allows direct comparison and increases validity. Structural equation models were calculated to analyze and compare the internal structure of the four T-dimensions within the two instruments. Although different test formats were used, for which the dimensions showed moderate correlations, the data for both test formats showed a similar internal structure and support a transformative view due to lack of direct influence of technological knowledge (TK) on TPACK.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two is better than one—Examining biology-specific TPACK and its T-dimensions from two angles\",\"authors\":\"Lena von Kotzebue\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15391523.2022.2030268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Until now, TPACK has mostly been measured by subject-unspecific self-report measures. In contrast, this study introduces and analyzes an objective and biology-specific performance assessment of the four T-dimensions of TPACK. This instrument was used in combination with a biology-specific self-report measure to examine 206 biology teacher students at an Austrian university. Using two test instruments to measure the same construct allows direct comparison and increases validity. Structural equation models were calculated to analyze and compare the internal structure of the four T-dimensions within the two instruments. Although different test formats were used, for which the dimensions showed moderate correlations, the data for both test formats showed a similar internal structure and support a transformative view due to lack of direct influence of technological knowledge (TK) on TPACK.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Technology in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Technology in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2030268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2030268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 到目前为止,TPACK 大多是通过非特定学科的自我报告测量方法来衡量的。与此相反,本研究介绍并分析了对 TPACK 的四个 T 维度进行的客观且针对生物学的绩效评估。该工具与针对生物学科的自我报告测量相结合,对奥地利一所大学的 206 名生物师范生进行了测试。使用两种测试工具来测量同一建构,可以进行直接比较并提高有效性。我们计算了结构方程模型,以分析和比较两种工具中四个 T 维度的内部结构。虽然使用了不同的测试格式,但两个测试格式的数据显示出相似的内部结构,并支持转化观点,因为技术知识(TK)对TPACK缺乏直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two is better than one—Examining biology-specific TPACK and its T-dimensions from two angles
Abstract Until now, TPACK has mostly been measured by subject-unspecific self-report measures. In contrast, this study introduces and analyzes an objective and biology-specific performance assessment of the four T-dimensions of TPACK. This instrument was used in combination with a biology-specific self-report measure to examine 206 biology teacher students at an Austrian university. Using two test instruments to measure the same construct allows direct comparison and increases validity. Structural equation models were calculated to analyze and compare the internal structure of the four T-dimensions within the two instruments. Although different test formats were used, for which the dimensions showed moderate correlations, the data for both test formats showed a similar internal structure and support a transformative view due to lack of direct influence of technological knowledge (TK) on TPACK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Journal of Research on Technology in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE) is a premier source for high-quality, peer-reviewed research that defines the state of the art, and future horizons, of teaching and learning with technology. The terms "education" and "technology" are broadly defined. Education is inclusive of formal educational environments ranging from PK-12 to higher education, and informal learning environments, such as museums, community centers, and after-school programs. Technology refers to both software and hardware innovations, and more broadly, the application of technological processes to education.
期刊最新文献
Culturally-sustaining and revitalizing computer science education for Indigenous students Computer science for English learners: supporting teacher learning and improved practice to engage multilinguals in AP computer science principles Micro: bit programming effects on elementary STEM teachers’ computational thinking and programming attitudes: a moderated mediation model Advancing culturally responsive-sustaining computer science through K-12 teacher professional development strategies Leading digital innovation in schools: the role of the open innovation mindset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1