使用光学相干断层扫描评估联合接受超声乳化术和玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗的患者与连续接受玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗和超声乳化术的患者的糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项观察性研究

Mohamed El-Behaidy, Ezz Eldein Mohamed, S. Dabour, Mohammed Al-Naimy, Rasha Elhiny
{"title":"使用光学相干断层扫描评估联合接受超声乳化术和玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗的患者与连续接受玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗和超声乳化术的患者的糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项观察性研究","authors":"Mohamed El-Behaidy, Ezz Eldein Mohamed, S. Dabour, Mohammed Al-Naimy, Rasha Elhiny","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_40_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To compare combined phacoemulsification and intravitreal Ranibizumab (RBZ) injection versus sequential Intravitreal Raibizumab injection and phacoemulsification on the progression of diabetic macular edema (DME) both clinically (through best corrected visual acuity) and by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Setting and design This observational study was conducted in October 6 University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology. Patient and methods Patients with non-ischemic diabetic macular edema (DME); along with, clinically significant cataract were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received three intravitreal 0.5 mg/0.05 ml RBZ injections on monthly basis. Group (I), received the first dose combined with phacoemulsification followed by the other two injections, one and two months postoperatively. Group (II), received the first dose two weeks before phacoemulsification followed by the other two injections, one and two months from the first one. Results The baseline mean central macular thickness (CMT) was comparable in both groups (P>0.05); however, the CMT one month after the third injection was 261±36 µm for Group (II) vs 320±65 µm for Group (I), which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Both study groups were comparable regarding the baseline mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (P>0.05); however, the mean BCVA at the end of follow-up was 0.32±0.23 LogMAR for Group (II) vs 0.50±0.19 LogMAR for Group (I), which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion Intravitreal RBZ injection has a significant clinical improving effect on both CMT and BCVA in diabetic patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) undergoing phacoemulsification; although, it is preferred to inject a single intravitreal injection two weeks before phacoemulsification to reach its peak effect in counteracting the high levels of VEGF released during the surgery.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of diabetic macular edema by using optical coherence tomography in patients underwent combined phacoemulsification and intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus patients underwent sequential intravitreal ranibizumab injection and phacoemulsification: an observational study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed El-Behaidy, Ezz Eldein Mohamed, S. Dabour, Mohammed Al-Naimy, Rasha Elhiny\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejos.ejos_40_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose To compare combined phacoemulsification and intravitreal Ranibizumab (RBZ) injection versus sequential Intravitreal Raibizumab injection and phacoemulsification on the progression of diabetic macular edema (DME) both clinically (through best corrected visual acuity) and by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Setting and design This observational study was conducted in October 6 University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology. Patient and methods Patients with non-ischemic diabetic macular edema (DME); along with, clinically significant cataract were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received three intravitreal 0.5 mg/0.05 ml RBZ injections on monthly basis. Group (I), received the first dose combined with phacoemulsification followed by the other two injections, one and two months postoperatively. Group (II), received the first dose two weeks before phacoemulsification followed by the other two injections, one and two months from the first one. Results The baseline mean central macular thickness (CMT) was comparable in both groups (P>0.05); however, the CMT one month after the third injection was 261±36 µm for Group (II) vs 320±65 µm for Group (I), which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Both study groups were comparable regarding the baseline mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (P>0.05); however, the mean BCVA at the end of follow-up was 0.32±0.23 LogMAR for Group (II) vs 0.50±0.19 LogMAR for Group (I), which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion Intravitreal RBZ injection has a significant clinical improving effect on both CMT and BCVA in diabetic patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) undergoing phacoemulsification; although, it is preferred to inject a single intravitreal injection two weeks before phacoemulsification to reach its peak effect in counteracting the high levels of VEGF released during the surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_40_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_40_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 比较联合超声乳化和玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(RBZ)与连续玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗和超声乳化在临床(通过最佳矫正视力)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)方面对糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)进展的影响。背景与设计 这项观察性研究在 10 月 6 日大学医学院眼科系进行。患者和方法 随机将非缺血性糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者和有临床症状的白内障患者分为两组。两组患者每月接受三次 0.5 毫克/0.05 毫升 RBZ 玻璃体内注射。组(I)在接受第一针注射的同时进行超声乳化手术,然后在术后一个月和两个月接受另外两针注射。组(II)在接受超声乳化术前两周注射第一针,然后在术后一到两个月注射另外两针。结果 两组的基线平均黄斑中心厚度(CMT)相当(P>0.05);但第三次注射一个月后,Ⅱ组的CMT为261±36 µm,而Ⅰ组为320±65 µm,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);但随访结束时,Ⅱ组的平均BCVA为0.32±0.23 LogMAR,而Ⅰ组为0.50±0.19 LogMAR,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 对于接受超声乳化术的糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者,玻璃体内注射 RBZ 对 CMT 和 BCVA 均有显著的临床改善作用;不过,最好在超声乳化术前两周进行一次玻璃体内注射,以达到抵消手术中释放的高水平血管内皮生长因子的峰值效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of diabetic macular edema by using optical coherence tomography in patients underwent combined phacoemulsification and intravitreal ranibizumab injection versus patients underwent sequential intravitreal ranibizumab injection and phacoemulsification: an observational study
Purpose To compare combined phacoemulsification and intravitreal Ranibizumab (RBZ) injection versus sequential Intravitreal Raibizumab injection and phacoemulsification on the progression of diabetic macular edema (DME) both clinically (through best corrected visual acuity) and by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Setting and design This observational study was conducted in October 6 University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology. Patient and methods Patients with non-ischemic diabetic macular edema (DME); along with, clinically significant cataract were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received three intravitreal 0.5 mg/0.05 ml RBZ injections on monthly basis. Group (I), received the first dose combined with phacoemulsification followed by the other two injections, one and two months postoperatively. Group (II), received the first dose two weeks before phacoemulsification followed by the other two injections, one and two months from the first one. Results The baseline mean central macular thickness (CMT) was comparable in both groups (P>0.05); however, the CMT one month after the third injection was 261±36 µm for Group (II) vs 320±65 µm for Group (I), which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Both study groups were comparable regarding the baseline mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (P>0.05); however, the mean BCVA at the end of follow-up was 0.32±0.23 LogMAR for Group (II) vs 0.50±0.19 LogMAR for Group (I), which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion Intravitreal RBZ injection has a significant clinical improving effect on both CMT and BCVA in diabetic patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) undergoing phacoemulsification; although, it is preferred to inject a single intravitreal injection two weeks before phacoemulsification to reach its peak effect in counteracting the high levels of VEGF released during the surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early versus late initiation of infliximab for refractory uveitis in a cohort of Egyptian BD patients Evaluation of macular vessel density among patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal participants “A study of knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding eye donation, eye banking and corneal transplantation in tertiary care hospital” Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study Changes in peripapillary and macular vasculature measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and their clinical correlation in patients with optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1