评估单侧角膜炎患者同侧眼的角膜地形图和高阶像差

Mahmoud Mohamed El Morsy, Ezz El Dein Galal Mohamed, Assad A. Ghanem, Ismail Ahmed Omar, Rasha Elhiny
{"title":"评估单侧角膜炎患者同侧眼的角膜地形图和高阶像差","authors":"Mahmoud Mohamed El Morsy, Ezz El Dein Galal Mohamed, Assad A. Ghanem, Ismail Ahmed Omar, Rasha Elhiny","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_36_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To assess parameters of corneal topography and higher order aberrations (HOAs) data in the apparently normal contralateral eyes of unilateral keratoconus (KC) cases in comparison with normal eyes of healthy individuals. Patients and methods This observational case-control study included 70 eyes divided into two equal groups; group A was the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients and group B included the normal control eyes. They were examined by Schimpflug camera to extract the study parameters (keratometry indices, the inferior-superior(I-S) difference at 4 mm, posterior elevation (PE), front and back difference, thickness progression index, corneal pachymetry, multimetric D index (D index), topometric indices and Zernike analysis). Results In comparing the study data between Groups A and B, we demonstrated that ISV, IVA, and CKI had no difference between the two groups. But other topometric parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups. Assessment of corneal aberrations revealed that the RMS HOA, vertical coma, and spherical aberrations were associated with significant increases in the apparently normal eyes of unilateral KC cases in comparison with healthy individual eyes (P<0.001). Conclusion Fellow eyes of unilateral KC cases seem not to be totally normal. And so, it is recommended to regularly examine these eyes at close intervals to catch up any abnormality and to avoid KC progression.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of corneal topography and higher order aberrations of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Mohamed El Morsy, Ezz El Dein Galal Mohamed, Assad A. Ghanem, Ismail Ahmed Omar, Rasha Elhiny\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejos.ejos_36_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose To assess parameters of corneal topography and higher order aberrations (HOAs) data in the apparently normal contralateral eyes of unilateral keratoconus (KC) cases in comparison with normal eyes of healthy individuals. Patients and methods This observational case-control study included 70 eyes divided into two equal groups; group A was the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients and group B included the normal control eyes. They were examined by Schimpflug camera to extract the study parameters (keratometry indices, the inferior-superior(I-S) difference at 4 mm, posterior elevation (PE), front and back difference, thickness progression index, corneal pachymetry, multimetric D index (D index), topometric indices and Zernike analysis). Results In comparing the study data between Groups A and B, we demonstrated that ISV, IVA, and CKI had no difference between the two groups. But other topometric parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups. Assessment of corneal aberrations revealed that the RMS HOA, vertical coma, and spherical aberrations were associated with significant increases in the apparently normal eyes of unilateral KC cases in comparison with healthy individual eyes (P<0.001). Conclusion Fellow eyes of unilateral KC cases seem not to be totally normal. And so, it is recommended to regularly examine these eyes at close intervals to catch up any abnormality and to avoid KC progression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_36_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_36_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估单侧角膜屈光不正(KC)患者明显正常的对侧眼的角膜地形图参数和高阶像差(HOAs)数据,并与健康人的正常眼进行比较。患者和方法 这项观察性病例对照研究包括 70 只眼睛,分为两个相等的组别:A 组为单侧角膜塑形镜患者的对侧眼,B 组包括正常对照眼。用 Schimpflug 相机对两组眼进行检查,以提取研究参数(角膜测量指数、4 毫米处的下-上(I-S)差、后方抬高(PE)、前后差、厚度进展指数、角膜厚度测量、多指标 D 指数(D 指数)、地形测量指数和 Zernike 分析)。结果 在比较 A 组和 B 组的研究数据时,我们发现 ISV、IVA 和 CKI 在两组之间没有差异。但其他地形测量参数在两组之间有显著的统计学差异。角膜像差的评估结果显示,单侧 KC 病例的表面正常眼与健康眼相比,RMS HOA、垂直昏迷和球差均显著增加(P<0.001)。结论 单侧 KC 患者的双眼似乎并非完全正常。因此,建议定期对这些眼睛进行近距离检查,以发现异常,避免 KC 病变发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of corneal topography and higher order aberrations of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus
Purpose To assess parameters of corneal topography and higher order aberrations (HOAs) data in the apparently normal contralateral eyes of unilateral keratoconus (KC) cases in comparison with normal eyes of healthy individuals. Patients and methods This observational case-control study included 70 eyes divided into two equal groups; group A was the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients and group B included the normal control eyes. They were examined by Schimpflug camera to extract the study parameters (keratometry indices, the inferior-superior(I-S) difference at 4 mm, posterior elevation (PE), front and back difference, thickness progression index, corneal pachymetry, multimetric D index (D index), topometric indices and Zernike analysis). Results In comparing the study data between Groups A and B, we demonstrated that ISV, IVA, and CKI had no difference between the two groups. But other topometric parameters showed statistically significant differences between the two groups. Assessment of corneal aberrations revealed that the RMS HOA, vertical coma, and spherical aberrations were associated with significant increases in the apparently normal eyes of unilateral KC cases in comparison with healthy individual eyes (P<0.001). Conclusion Fellow eyes of unilateral KC cases seem not to be totally normal. And so, it is recommended to regularly examine these eyes at close intervals to catch up any abnormality and to avoid KC progression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early versus late initiation of infliximab for refractory uveitis in a cohort of Egyptian BD patients Evaluation of macular vessel density among patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal participants “A study of knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding eye donation, eye banking and corneal transplantation in tertiary care hospital” Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study Changes in peripapillary and macular vasculature measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and their clinical correlation in patients with optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1