利用 XGBoost 方法修正热带气旋强度集合预报的偏差

Songjiang Feng, Yan Tan, Junfeng Kang, Ruiqiang Ding, Yanjie Li, Quanjia Zhong
{"title":"利用 XGBoost 方法修正热带气旋强度集合预报的偏差","authors":"Songjiang Feng, Yan Tan, Junfeng Kang, Ruiqiang Ding, Yanjie Li, Quanjia Zhong","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0159.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn this study, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm is used to correct tropical cyclone (TC) intensity in ensemble forecast data from the Typhoon Ensemble Data Assimilation and Prediction System (TEDAPS) at the Shanghai Typhoon Institute (STI), China Meteorological Administration (CMA). Results show that the forecast accuracy of TC intensity may be improved substantially using the XGBoost algorithm, especially when compared with a simple ensemble average of all members in the ensemble forecast [as depicted by the ensemble average (EnsAve) algorithm in this study]. The forecast errors for maximum wind speed (MWS) and minimum sea-level pressure (MSLP) have been reduced by a significant margin, ranging from 6.3% to 18.4% for MWS and from 4% to 14.9% for MSLP, respectively. The performance of the XGBoost algorithm is overall better than that of the EnsAve algorithm, although there are a few samples when it is worse. The bias analysis shows that TEDAPS underpredicts the MWS and overpredicts the MSLP, meaning that the TEDAPS underestimates TC intensity. However, the XGBoost algorithm can reduce the bias to improve the forecast accuracy of TC intensity. Specifically, it achieves a reduction of over 20% in forecast errors for both the MWS and MSLP of typhoons compared to the EnsAve algorithm, indicating the XGBoost algorithm’s particular advantage in forecasting intense TCs. These results indicate that the TC intensity forecast can be substantially improved using the XGBoost algorithm, relative to the EnsAve algorithm.","PeriodicalId":509742,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bias correction of tropical cyclone intensity for ensemble forecasts using the XGBoost method\",\"authors\":\"Songjiang Feng, Yan Tan, Junfeng Kang, Ruiqiang Ding, Yanjie Li, Quanjia Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/waf-d-23-0159.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn this study, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm is used to correct tropical cyclone (TC) intensity in ensemble forecast data from the Typhoon Ensemble Data Assimilation and Prediction System (TEDAPS) at the Shanghai Typhoon Institute (STI), China Meteorological Administration (CMA). Results show that the forecast accuracy of TC intensity may be improved substantially using the XGBoost algorithm, especially when compared with a simple ensemble average of all members in the ensemble forecast [as depicted by the ensemble average (EnsAve) algorithm in this study]. The forecast errors for maximum wind speed (MWS) and minimum sea-level pressure (MSLP) have been reduced by a significant margin, ranging from 6.3% to 18.4% for MWS and from 4% to 14.9% for MSLP, respectively. The performance of the XGBoost algorithm is overall better than that of the EnsAve algorithm, although there are a few samples when it is worse. The bias analysis shows that TEDAPS underpredicts the MWS and overpredicts the MSLP, meaning that the TEDAPS underestimates TC intensity. However, the XGBoost algorithm can reduce the bias to improve the forecast accuracy of TC intensity. Specifically, it achieves a reduction of over 20% in forecast errors for both the MWS and MSLP of typhoons compared to the EnsAve algorithm, indicating the XGBoost algorithm’s particular advantage in forecasting intense TCs. These results indicate that the TC intensity forecast can be substantially improved using the XGBoost algorithm, relative to the EnsAve algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0159.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0159.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)算法来修正中国气象局上海台风研究所台风集合数据同化与预报系统(TEDAPS)集合预报数据中的热带气旋(TC)强度。结果表明,使用 XGBoost 算法可大幅提高对热带气旋强度的预报精度,特别是与集合预报中所有成员的简单集合平均相比(如本研究中的集合平均(EnsAve)算法所示)。最大风速(MWS)和最低海平面气压(MSLP)的预报误差大幅减少,最大风速误差从 6.3% 到 18.4%,最低海平面气压误差从 4% 到 14.9%。XGBoost 算法的性能总体上优于 EnsAve 算法,但也有少数样本比 EnsAve 算法差。偏差分析表明,TEDAPS 低估了 MWS,高估了 MSLP,这意味着 TEDAPS 低估了热带气旋强度。然而,XGBoost 算法可以减少偏差,从而提高 TC 强度的预报精度。具体来说,与 EnsAve 算法相比,该算法在台风 MWS 和 MSLP 的预报误差上都减少了 20% 以上,这表明 XGBoost 算法在预报强热带气旋方面具有特殊优势。这些结果表明,相对于 EnsAve 算法,使用 XGBoost 算法可以大幅改进热气旋强度预报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bias correction of tropical cyclone intensity for ensemble forecasts using the XGBoost method
In this study, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm is used to correct tropical cyclone (TC) intensity in ensemble forecast data from the Typhoon Ensemble Data Assimilation and Prediction System (TEDAPS) at the Shanghai Typhoon Institute (STI), China Meteorological Administration (CMA). Results show that the forecast accuracy of TC intensity may be improved substantially using the XGBoost algorithm, especially when compared with a simple ensemble average of all members in the ensemble forecast [as depicted by the ensemble average (EnsAve) algorithm in this study]. The forecast errors for maximum wind speed (MWS) and minimum sea-level pressure (MSLP) have been reduced by a significant margin, ranging from 6.3% to 18.4% for MWS and from 4% to 14.9% for MSLP, respectively. The performance of the XGBoost algorithm is overall better than that of the EnsAve algorithm, although there are a few samples when it is worse. The bias analysis shows that TEDAPS underpredicts the MWS and overpredicts the MSLP, meaning that the TEDAPS underestimates TC intensity. However, the XGBoost algorithm can reduce the bias to improve the forecast accuracy of TC intensity. Specifically, it achieves a reduction of over 20% in forecast errors for both the MWS and MSLP of typhoons compared to the EnsAve algorithm, indicating the XGBoost algorithm’s particular advantage in forecasting intense TCs. These results indicate that the TC intensity forecast can be substantially improved using the XGBoost algorithm, relative to the EnsAve algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of Wind Power Prediction by Assimilating Principal Components of Cabin Radar Observations Tropical cyclones in the GEOS-S2S-2 subseasonal forecasts Regime-Dependent Characteristics and Predictability of Cold Season Precipitation Events in the St. Lawrence River Valley The evolution of the 2021 Seacor Power Tragedy in Coastal Louisiana Representation of Blowing Snow and Associated Visibility Reduction in an Operational High-Resolution Weather Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1