Reddit 上和 Reddit 中的规范执行:接触和参与规则

Q2 Computer Science First Monday Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.5210/fm.v29i1.13141
Daniel Trottier, Frazer Woodhead
{"title":"Reddit 上和 Reddit 中的规范执行:接触和参与规则","authors":"Daniel Trottier, Frazer Woodhead","doi":"10.5210/fm.v29i1.13141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social platform Reddit hosts a set of communities that denounce offensive behavior, invoking scrutiny and shame on (categories of) individuals. Despite varying in their targets, they all promote actionable content to an audience who can view, share and comment on it. These groups allow a global public to air grievances, enabling both accountability and abuse. Following high profile scandals, Reddit routinely sanctions and purges problematic ‘subreddits’. As a matter of self-preservation, subreddits that watch over the public also maintain heightened scrutiny of their own members. Group rules and other prescriptive texts are a means to instill this scrutiny among a broader audience. In analyzing rules and other content management practices in 68 shaming based subreddits, this paper considers how these groups temper platform-based denunciation.","PeriodicalId":38833,"journal":{"name":"First Monday","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norm enforcement on and of Reddit: Rules of engagement and participation\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Trottier, Frazer Woodhead\",\"doi\":\"10.5210/fm.v29i1.13141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The social platform Reddit hosts a set of communities that denounce offensive behavior, invoking scrutiny and shame on (categories of) individuals. Despite varying in their targets, they all promote actionable content to an audience who can view, share and comment on it. These groups allow a global public to air grievances, enabling both accountability and abuse. Following high profile scandals, Reddit routinely sanctions and purges problematic ‘subreddits’. As a matter of self-preservation, subreddits that watch over the public also maintain heightened scrutiny of their own members. Group rules and other prescriptive texts are a means to instill this scrutiny among a broader audience. In analyzing rules and other content management practices in 68 shaming based subreddits, this paper considers how these groups temper platform-based denunciation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Monday\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Monday\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i1.13141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Monday","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v29i1.13141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Reddit 社交平台上有一系列谴责攻击性行为的社区,对(各类)个人进行审查和羞辱。尽管目标各不相同,但它们都向可以查看、分享和评论的受众推广可操作的内容。这些群组允许全球公众表达不满,既能追究责任,也能制止谩骂。在发生备受瞩目的丑闻后,Reddit 通常会制裁和清除有问题的 "subreddits"。出于自我保护的考虑,监督公众的子红点也会加强对自己成员的审查。群组规则和其他规范性文本是向更广泛受众灌输这种审查的一种手段。本文通过分析 68 个以羞辱为基础的子红帖中的规则和其他内容管理实践,探讨了这些群体如何克制基于平台的谴责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Norm enforcement on and of Reddit: Rules of engagement and participation
The social platform Reddit hosts a set of communities that denounce offensive behavior, invoking scrutiny and shame on (categories of) individuals. Despite varying in their targets, they all promote actionable content to an audience who can view, share and comment on it. These groups allow a global public to air grievances, enabling both accountability and abuse. Following high profile scandals, Reddit routinely sanctions and purges problematic ‘subreddits’. As a matter of self-preservation, subreddits that watch over the public also maintain heightened scrutiny of their own members. Group rules and other prescriptive texts are a means to instill this scrutiny among a broader audience. In analyzing rules and other content management practices in 68 shaming based subreddits, this paper considers how these groups temper platform-based denunciation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
First Monday
First Monday Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: First Monday is one of the first openly accessible, peer–reviewed journals on the Internet, solely devoted to the Internet. Since its start in May 1996, First Monday has published 1,035 papers in 164 issues; these papers were written by 1,316 different authors. In addition, eight special issues have appeared. The most recent special issue was entitled A Web site with a view — The Third World on First Monday and it was edited by Eduardo Villanueva Mansilla. First Monday is indexed in Communication Abstracts, Computer & Communications Security Abstracts, DoIS, eGranary Digital Library, INSPEC, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, LISA, PAIS, and other services.
期刊最新文献
French-speaking photo models communication: A comparison across platforms and profiles, a possible evolution Angry sharing: Exploring the influence of Facebook reactions on political post sharing Everyday positivity: An appraisal analysis of online identity in food blogs Tweeting on thin ice: Scientists in dialogic climate change communication with the public Education runs quickly violence runs slowly: An analysis of closed captioning speed and reading level in children’s television franchises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1