M. S. Fekri, Faranak Salajegheh, Mohammad Rezaei Zadeh Rukerd, M. Nakhaie, Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani, Fatemeh Goharriz, Mohammad Sadegh Shahmoradzadeh Miri
{"title":"评估 COVID-19 患者的肺功能和生活质量:试点研究","authors":"M. S. Fekri, Faranak Salajegheh, Mohammad Rezaei Zadeh Rukerd, M. Nakhaie, Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani, Fatemeh Goharriz, Mohammad Sadegh Shahmoradzadeh Miri","doi":"10.2174/011573398x268451231212111328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nRespiratory complications of COVID-19 should be considered as critical concerns that require prompt medical intervention. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 on pulmonary function and quality of life among recovered patients through a three-month follow-up period.\n\n\n\nThis pilot study aimed to assess the pulmonary functions and quality of life in 32\nCOVID-19 survivors at Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, Iran. Pulmonary functions were evaluated\nusing spirometry to evaluate FVC, FEV1, PEF, and FEV1/FVC. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire, which evaluated eight health-related concepts. Statistical analysis\nwas performed using SPSS v23.\n\n\n\nAmong the 32 survivors of COVID-19, 41.6% and 59.4% were male and female, respectively. The mean length of hospitalization for admitted patients (56.3% of all patients) was 10.89\ndays. Male survivors exhibited significantly lower values in FEV1 (3.06 vs. 4.05, p = 0.02), PEF\n(6.45 vs. 10.58, p = 0.002), and FEF-25-75 (3.17 vs. 4.94, p = 0.008) compared to healthy males\nof the same age. For female survivors, all pulmonary indices were significantly lower than healthy\nfemales of the same age. Regarding quality of life, there was no statistical significance between\nmale and female survivors. However, when compared with healthy populations, survivors obtained lower scores in various quality-of-life items. Male survivors had notably lower scores in\nphysical functioning (3.17 vs. 4.94, p = 0.008) and physical role (40.38 vs. 73.8, p = 0.008). Female survivors scored considerably lower than the healthy population in all quality of life items,\nexcept for role emotional and mental health.\n\n\n\nCOVID-19 survivors had lower pulmonary indices and quality of life compared to\nhealthy individuals of the same sex and age, with female survivors exhibiting worse conditions.\n","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":" 58","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Lung Function and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Patients: A\\nPilot Study\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Fekri, Faranak Salajegheh, Mohammad Rezaei Zadeh Rukerd, M. Nakhaie, Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani, Fatemeh Goharriz, Mohammad Sadegh Shahmoradzadeh Miri\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/011573398x268451231212111328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nRespiratory complications of COVID-19 should be considered as critical concerns that require prompt medical intervention. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 on pulmonary function and quality of life among recovered patients through a three-month follow-up period.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis pilot study aimed to assess the pulmonary functions and quality of life in 32\\nCOVID-19 survivors at Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, Iran. Pulmonary functions were evaluated\\nusing spirometry to evaluate FVC, FEV1, PEF, and FEV1/FVC. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire, which evaluated eight health-related concepts. Statistical analysis\\nwas performed using SPSS v23.\\n\\n\\n\\nAmong the 32 survivors of COVID-19, 41.6% and 59.4% were male and female, respectively. The mean length of hospitalization for admitted patients (56.3% of all patients) was 10.89\\ndays. Male survivors exhibited significantly lower values in FEV1 (3.06 vs. 4.05, p = 0.02), PEF\\n(6.45 vs. 10.58, p = 0.002), and FEF-25-75 (3.17 vs. 4.94, p = 0.008) compared to healthy males\\nof the same age. For female survivors, all pulmonary indices were significantly lower than healthy\\nfemales of the same age. Regarding quality of life, there was no statistical significance between\\nmale and female survivors. However, when compared with healthy populations, survivors obtained lower scores in various quality-of-life items. Male survivors had notably lower scores in\\nphysical functioning (3.17 vs. 4.94, p = 0.008) and physical role (40.38 vs. 73.8, p = 0.008). Female survivors scored considerably lower than the healthy population in all quality of life items,\\nexcept for role emotional and mental health.\\n\\n\\n\\nCOVID-19 survivors had lower pulmonary indices and quality of life compared to\\nhealthy individuals of the same sex and age, with female survivors exhibiting worse conditions.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\" 58\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x268451231212111328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398x268451231212111328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Lung Function and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Patients: A
Pilot Study
Respiratory complications of COVID-19 should be considered as critical concerns that require prompt medical intervention. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of COVID-19 on pulmonary function and quality of life among recovered patients through a three-month follow-up period.
This pilot study aimed to assess the pulmonary functions and quality of life in 32
COVID-19 survivors at Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, Iran. Pulmonary functions were evaluated
using spirometry to evaluate FVC, FEV1, PEF, and FEV1/FVC. Quality of life was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire, which evaluated eight health-related concepts. Statistical analysis
was performed using SPSS v23.
Among the 32 survivors of COVID-19, 41.6% and 59.4% were male and female, respectively. The mean length of hospitalization for admitted patients (56.3% of all patients) was 10.89
days. Male survivors exhibited significantly lower values in FEV1 (3.06 vs. 4.05, p = 0.02), PEF
(6.45 vs. 10.58, p = 0.002), and FEF-25-75 (3.17 vs. 4.94, p = 0.008) compared to healthy males
of the same age. For female survivors, all pulmonary indices were significantly lower than healthy
females of the same age. Regarding quality of life, there was no statistical significance between
male and female survivors. However, when compared with healthy populations, survivors obtained lower scores in various quality-of-life items. Male survivors had notably lower scores in
physical functioning (3.17 vs. 4.94, p = 0.008) and physical role (40.38 vs. 73.8, p = 0.008). Female survivors scored considerably lower than the healthy population in all quality of life items,
except for role emotional and mental health.
COVID-19 survivors had lower pulmonary indices and quality of life compared to
healthy individuals of the same sex and age, with female survivors exhibiting worse conditions.
期刊介绍:
Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.