评估幼儿教育和保育中以证据为基础的健康饮食和体育活动干预措施的可扩展性:关于最终用户观点的横断面研究

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100122
Alice Grady , Jacklyn Jackson , Luke Wolfenden , Melanie Lum , Andrew Milat , Adrian Bauman , Rebecca Hodder , Sze Lin Yoong
{"title":"评估幼儿教育和保育中以证据为基础的健康饮食和体育活动干预措施的可扩展性:关于最终用户观点的横断面研究","authors":"Alice Grady ,&nbsp;Jacklyn Jackson ,&nbsp;Luke Wolfenden ,&nbsp;Melanie Lum ,&nbsp;Andrew Milat ,&nbsp;Adrian Bauman ,&nbsp;Rebecca Hodder ,&nbsp;Sze Lin Yoong","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe early childhood education and care (ECEC) services: i) perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions; and ii) associations between scalability and service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of ECEC services across Australia. The scalability of 12 healthy eating and physical activity interventions was assessed using items based on the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Higher scores represented higher perceived scalability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 453 participants, the highest scoring healthy eating and physical activity interventions were ‘providing healthy eating education and activities for children’ (M43.05) (out of 50) and ‘providing sufficient opportunities for child physical activity’ (M41.43). The lowest scoring was ‘providing families with lunchbox guidelines’ (M38.99) and ‘engaging families in activities to increase child physical activity’ (M38.36). Services located in rural areas, compared to urban areas, scored the overall scalability of both healthy eating and physical activity interventions significantly lower.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions in the ECEC setting vary according to service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>Findings identify where government investment and implementation efforts may be prioritised to facilitate scale-up. An investigation into the barriers and support required for lower-scoring interventions is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998/pdfft?md5=db91bcb4757ae8ad12c5442e8cdc9b9e&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020023052998-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the scalability of evidence-based healthy eating and physical activity interventions in early childhood education and care: A cross-sectional study of end-user perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Alice Grady ,&nbsp;Jacklyn Jackson ,&nbsp;Luke Wolfenden ,&nbsp;Melanie Lum ,&nbsp;Andrew Milat ,&nbsp;Adrian Bauman ,&nbsp;Rebecca Hodder ,&nbsp;Sze Lin Yoong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe early childhood education and care (ECEC) services: i) perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions; and ii) associations between scalability and service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of ECEC services across Australia. The scalability of 12 healthy eating and physical activity interventions was assessed using items based on the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Higher scores represented higher perceived scalability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 453 participants, the highest scoring healthy eating and physical activity interventions were ‘providing healthy eating education and activities for children’ (M43.05) (out of 50) and ‘providing sufficient opportunities for child physical activity’ (M41.43). The lowest scoring was ‘providing families with lunchbox guidelines’ (M38.99) and ‘engaging families in activities to increase child physical activity’ (M38.36). Services located in rural areas, compared to urban areas, scored the overall scalability of both healthy eating and physical activity interventions significantly lower.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions in the ECEC setting vary according to service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>Findings identify where government investment and implementation efforts may be prioritised to facilitate scale-up. An investigation into the barriers and support required for lower-scoring interventions is warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998/pdfft?md5=db91bcb4757ae8ad12c5442e8cdc9b9e&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020023052998-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标描述幼儿教育和保育(ECEC)服务:i)对健康饮食和体育锻炼干预措施可扩展性的看法;ii)可扩展性与服务特点之间的关联。方法对澳大利亚各地随机抽取的幼儿教育和保育服务进行横断面调查。采用干预措施可扩展性评估工具(Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool)中的项目对 12 项健康饮食和体育活动干预措施的可扩展性进行了评估。结果从 453 名参与者中,得分最高的健康饮食和体育锻炼干预措施是 "为儿童提供健康饮食教育和活动"(M43.05)(满分 50 分)和 "为儿童提供足够的体育锻炼机会"(M41.43)。得分最低的是 "为家庭提供午餐盒指南"(M38.99)和 "让家庭参与增加儿童体育活动的活动"(M38.36)。与城市地区相比,位于农村地区的服务机构对健康饮食和体力活动干预措施的整体可推广性的评分明显较低。结论对幼儿保育和教育环境中健康饮食和体力活动干预措施可推广性的看法因服务特点而异。有必要对得分较低的干预措施所面临的障碍和所需的支持进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the scalability of evidence-based healthy eating and physical activity interventions in early childhood education and care: A cross-sectional study of end-user perspectives

Objectives

To describe early childhood education and care (ECEC) services: i) perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions; and ii) associations between scalability and service characteristics.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of ECEC services across Australia. The scalability of 12 healthy eating and physical activity interventions was assessed using items based on the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Higher scores represented higher perceived scalability.

Results

From 453 participants, the highest scoring healthy eating and physical activity interventions were ‘providing healthy eating education and activities for children’ (M43.05) (out of 50) and ‘providing sufficient opportunities for child physical activity’ (M41.43). The lowest scoring was ‘providing families with lunchbox guidelines’ (M38.99) and ‘engaging families in activities to increase child physical activity’ (M38.36). Services located in rural areas, compared to urban areas, scored the overall scalability of both healthy eating and physical activity interventions significantly lower.

Conclusions

Perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions in the ECEC setting vary according to service characteristics.

Implications for public health

Findings identify where government investment and implementation efforts may be prioritised to facilitate scale-up. An investigation into the barriers and support required for lower-scoring interventions is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Emergency contraception access in Fijian community pharmacies: A descriptive study Preventive healthcare practice by allied health professionals: Results from a cross-sectional survey in rural and regional Victoria Revising a right to food road map—perspectives of Australian key informants “Freedom to move through the house”: How a healthy housing initiative improves quality of life in Aotearoa New Zealand How do we fund Public Health in Australia? How should we?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1