Alice Grady , Jacklyn Jackson , Luke Wolfenden , Melanie Lum , Andrew Milat , Adrian Bauman , Rebecca Hodder , Sze Lin Yoong
{"title":"评估幼儿教育和保育中以证据为基础的健康饮食和体育活动干预措施的可扩展性:关于最终用户观点的横断面研究","authors":"Alice Grady , Jacklyn Jackson , Luke Wolfenden , Melanie Lum , Andrew Milat , Adrian Bauman , Rebecca Hodder , Sze Lin Yoong","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe early childhood education and care (ECEC) services: i) perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions; and ii) associations between scalability and service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of ECEC services across Australia. The scalability of 12 healthy eating and physical activity interventions was assessed using items based on the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Higher scores represented higher perceived scalability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 453 participants, the highest scoring healthy eating and physical activity interventions were ‘providing healthy eating education and activities for children’ (M43.05) (out of 50) and ‘providing sufficient opportunities for child physical activity’ (M41.43). The lowest scoring was ‘providing families with lunchbox guidelines’ (M38.99) and ‘engaging families in activities to increase child physical activity’ (M38.36). Services located in rural areas, compared to urban areas, scored the overall scalability of both healthy eating and physical activity interventions significantly lower.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions in the ECEC setting vary according to service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>Findings identify where government investment and implementation efforts may be prioritised to facilitate scale-up. An investigation into the barriers and support required for lower-scoring interventions is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 1","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998/pdfft?md5=db91bcb4757ae8ad12c5442e8cdc9b9e&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020023052998-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the scalability of evidence-based healthy eating and physical activity interventions in early childhood education and care: A cross-sectional study of end-user perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Alice Grady , Jacklyn Jackson , Luke Wolfenden , Melanie Lum , Andrew Milat , Adrian Bauman , Rebecca Hodder , Sze Lin Yoong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe early childhood education and care (ECEC) services: i) perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions; and ii) associations between scalability and service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of ECEC services across Australia. The scalability of 12 healthy eating and physical activity interventions was assessed using items based on the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Higher scores represented higher perceived scalability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 453 participants, the highest scoring healthy eating and physical activity interventions were ‘providing healthy eating education and activities for children’ (M43.05) (out of 50) and ‘providing sufficient opportunities for child physical activity’ (M41.43). The lowest scoring was ‘providing families with lunchbox guidelines’ (M38.99) and ‘engaging families in activities to increase child physical activity’ (M38.36). Services located in rural areas, compared to urban areas, scored the overall scalability of both healthy eating and physical activity interventions significantly lower.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions in the ECEC setting vary according to service characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>Findings identify where government investment and implementation efforts may be prioritised to facilitate scale-up. An investigation into the barriers and support required for lower-scoring interventions is warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998/pdfft?md5=db91bcb4757ae8ad12c5442e8cdc9b9e&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020023052998-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the scalability of evidence-based healthy eating and physical activity interventions in early childhood education and care: A cross-sectional study of end-user perspectives
Objectives
To describe early childhood education and care (ECEC) services: i) perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions; and ii) associations between scalability and service characteristics.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a randomly selected sample of ECEC services across Australia. The scalability of 12 healthy eating and physical activity interventions was assessed using items based on the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Higher scores represented higher perceived scalability.
Results
From 453 participants, the highest scoring healthy eating and physical activity interventions were ‘providing healthy eating education and activities for children’ (M43.05) (out of 50) and ‘providing sufficient opportunities for child physical activity’ (M41.43). The lowest scoring was ‘providing families with lunchbox guidelines’ (M38.99) and ‘engaging families in activities to increase child physical activity’ (M38.36). Services located in rural areas, compared to urban areas, scored the overall scalability of both healthy eating and physical activity interventions significantly lower.
Conclusions
Perceptions regarding the scalability of healthy eating and physical activity interventions in the ECEC setting vary according to service characteristics.
Implications for public health
Findings identify where government investment and implementation efforts may be prioritised to facilitate scale-up. An investigation into the barriers and support required for lower-scoring interventions is warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.