简化结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的诊断路径:意大利一家癌症中心的十年经验。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000870
Alberto Puccini, Simone Nardin, Lucia Trevisan, Sonia Lastraioli, Viviana Gismondi, Ilaria Ricciotti, Azzurra Damiani, Giacomo Bregni, Roberto Murialdo, Alessandro Pastorino, Valentino Martelli, Annalice Gandini, Luca Mastracci, Liliana Varesco, Maria Dono, Linda Battistuzzi, Federica Grillo, Stefania Sciallero
{"title":"简化结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的诊断路径:意大利一家癌症中心的十年经验。","authors":"Alberto Puccini, Simone Nardin, Lucia Trevisan, Sonia Lastraioli, Viviana Gismondi, Ilaria Ricciotti, Azzurra Damiani, Giacomo Bregni, Roberto Murialdo, Alessandro Pastorino, Valentino Martelli, Annalice Gandini, Luca Mastracci, Liliana Varesco, Maria Dono, Linda Battistuzzi, Federica Grillo, Stefania Sciallero","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients for Lynch syndrome (LS) through MisMatch Repair (MMR) testing is recommended. BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation (Reflex Testing, RefT)generally rule out LS in MLH1-deficient (dMLH1) patients. We estimated the impact of RefTon genetic counseling (GC) and on the diagnostic yield of genetic testing (GT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 3199 CRC patients were referred to our center between 2011 and 2021. Patients referred until January 2019 (n=2536) underwent universal MMR testing and were termed 'Cohort A'; among patients after February 2019 (n=663), 'Cohort B', RefT was also performed in dMLH1 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 401/3199 patients (12.5%) were MMR-deficient (dMMR); 312 (77.8%) in cohort A and 89 (22.2%) inB; 346/401 were dMLH1 (86.3%), 262/312 (83.9%) in cohort A and 84/89 (94.3%) in B. In Cohort A, 91/312 (29.1%) dMMR patients were referred to GC, 69/91 (75.8%) were in the dMLH1 group; 57/69 (82.6%) dMLH1 patients underwent GT and 1/57 (1.7%) had LS. In Cohort B, 3/84 dMLH1 patients did not undergo BRAF testing. Three BRAF wt and not hypermethylated of the remaining 81 dMLH1 patients were referred to GC and GT, and one had LS. This diagnostic pathway reduced GC referrals by 96% (78/81) in Cohort B and increased the diagnostic yield of GT by about 20 times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support RefT in dMLH1 CRC patients within the LS diagnostic pathway, as it reduces the number of GC sessions needed and increases the diagnostic yield of GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"355-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streamlining the diagnostic pathway for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients: a 10-year experience in a single Italian Cancer Center.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Puccini, Simone Nardin, Lucia Trevisan, Sonia Lastraioli, Viviana Gismondi, Ilaria Ricciotti, Azzurra Damiani, Giacomo Bregni, Roberto Murialdo, Alessandro Pastorino, Valentino Martelli, Annalice Gandini, Luca Mastracci, Liliana Varesco, Maria Dono, Linda Battistuzzi, Federica Grillo, Stefania Sciallero\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients for Lynch syndrome (LS) through MisMatch Repair (MMR) testing is recommended. BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation (Reflex Testing, RefT)generally rule out LS in MLH1-deficient (dMLH1) patients. We estimated the impact of RefTon genetic counseling (GC) and on the diagnostic yield of genetic testing (GT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 3199 CRC patients were referred to our center between 2011 and 2021. Patients referred until January 2019 (n=2536) underwent universal MMR testing and were termed 'Cohort A'; among patients after February 2019 (n=663), 'Cohort B', RefT was also performed in dMLH1 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 401/3199 patients (12.5%) were MMR-deficient (dMMR); 312 (77.8%) in cohort A and 89 (22.2%) inB; 346/401 were dMLH1 (86.3%), 262/312 (83.9%) in cohort A and 84/89 (94.3%) in B. In Cohort A, 91/312 (29.1%) dMMR patients were referred to GC, 69/91 (75.8%) were in the dMLH1 group; 57/69 (82.6%) dMLH1 patients underwent GT and 1/57 (1.7%) had LS. In Cohort B, 3/84 dMLH1 patients did not undergo BRAF testing. Three BRAF wt and not hypermethylated of the remaining 81 dMLH1 patients were referred to GC and GT, and one had LS. This diagnostic pathway reduced GC referrals by 96% (78/81) in Cohort B and increased the diagnostic yield of GT by about 20 times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support RefT in dMLH1 CRC patients within the LS diagnostic pathway, as it reduces the number of GC sessions needed and increases the diagnostic yield of GT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"355-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000870\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议通过错配修补(MMR)检测对结直肠癌(CRC)患者进行林奇综合征(LS)普查。BRAFV600E突变和/或MLH1启动子甲基化(反射检测,RefT)通常可排除MLH1缺陷(dMLH1)患者的LS。我们估算了 RefT 对遗传咨询(GC)和遗传检测(GT)诊断率的影响:2011年至2021年间,共有3199名CRC患者转诊至本中心。2019年1月之前转诊的患者(n=2536)接受了MMR通用检测,被称为 "队列A";2019年2月之后的患者(n=663)被称为 "队列B",对dMLH1患者也进行了RefT:总体而言,401/3199 例患者(12.5%)为 MMR 缺乏(dMMR),A 组群中有 312 例(77.8%),B 组群中有 89 例(22.2%);346/401 例患者为 dMLH1(86.3%),A 组群中有 262/312 例(83.9%),B 组群中有 84/89 例(94.3%)。在队列 A 中,91/312(29.1%)名 dMMR 患者被转至 GC,69/91(75.8%)名 dMLH1 组;57/69(82.6%)名 dMLH1 患者接受了 GT,1/57(1.7%)名患者接受了 LS。在队列 B 中,3/84 的 dMLH1 患者没有接受 BRAF 检测。剩余的 81 名 dMLH1 患者中,有 3 名 BRAF 含量为 wt 且未发生高甲基化的患者被转诊至 GC 和 GT,1 名患者进行了 LS。在队列 B 中,这种诊断途径将 GC 转诊率降低了 96%(78/81),并将 GT 的诊断率提高了约 20 倍:我们的研究结果支持在 LS 诊断路径下对 dMLH1 CRC 患者进行 RefT,因为它减少了所需的 GC 治疗次数,提高了 GT 的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Streamlining the diagnostic pathway for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients: a 10-year experience in a single Italian Cancer Center.

Background: Universal screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients for Lynch syndrome (LS) through MisMatch Repair (MMR) testing is recommended. BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation (Reflex Testing, RefT)generally rule out LS in MLH1-deficient (dMLH1) patients. We estimated the impact of RefTon genetic counseling (GC) and on the diagnostic yield of genetic testing (GT).

Methods: Overall, 3199 CRC patients were referred to our center between 2011 and 2021. Patients referred until January 2019 (n=2536) underwent universal MMR testing and were termed 'Cohort A'; among patients after February 2019 (n=663), 'Cohort B', RefT was also performed in dMLH1 patients.

Results: Overall, 401/3199 patients (12.5%) were MMR-deficient (dMMR); 312 (77.8%) in cohort A and 89 (22.2%) inB; 346/401 were dMLH1 (86.3%), 262/312 (83.9%) in cohort A and 84/89 (94.3%) in B. In Cohort A, 91/312 (29.1%) dMMR patients were referred to GC, 69/91 (75.8%) were in the dMLH1 group; 57/69 (82.6%) dMLH1 patients underwent GT and 1/57 (1.7%) had LS. In Cohort B, 3/84 dMLH1 patients did not undergo BRAF testing. Three BRAF wt and not hypermethylated of the remaining 81 dMLH1 patients were referred to GC and GT, and one had LS. This diagnostic pathway reduced GC referrals by 96% (78/81) in Cohort B and increased the diagnostic yield of GT by about 20 times.

Conclusion: Our findings support RefT in dMLH1 CRC patients within the LS diagnostic pathway, as it reduces the number of GC sessions needed and increases the diagnostic yield of GT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
期刊最新文献
Impact of colorectal cancer screening by primary tumor location in a real-world setting in Japan. Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and prognostic factors of patients with second primary triple-negative breast cancer: a study based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Marital status as an independent prognostic factor for survival in women with vaginal cancer: evidence from the SEER database analysis. Use of stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Long-term trends in the burden of breast cancer in China over three decades: a joinpoint regression and age-period-cohort analysis based on Global Burden of Disease 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1